/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 The quantity of dissolved oxygen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The quantity of dissolved oxygen is a measure of water pollution in lakes, rivers, and streams. Water samples were taken at four different locations in a river in an effort to determine if water pollution varied from location to location. Location I was 500 meters above an industrial plant water discharge point and near the shore. Location II was 200 meters above the discharge point and in midstream. Location III was 50 meters downstream from the discharge point and near the shore. Location IV was 200 meters downstream from the discharge point and in midstream. The following table shows the results. Lower dissolved oxygen readings mean more pollution. Because of the difficulty in getting midstream samples, ecology students collecting the data had fewer of these samples. Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. Do we reject or not reject the claim that the quantity of dissolved oxygen does not vary from one location to another? $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Location I } & \text { Location II } & \text { Location III } & \text { Location IV } \\ 7.3 & 6.6 & 4.2 & 4.4 \\ 6.9 & 7.1 & 5.9 & 5.1 \\ 7.5 & 7.7 & 4.9 & 6.2 \\ 6.8 & 8.0 & 5.1 & \\ 6.2 & & 4.5 & \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis; the dissolved oxygen levels vary by location.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

Let's start by stating the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that there is no difference in the mean dissolved oxygen levels at the different locations. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is that there is at least one difference in the mean levels across the locations.
02

Choose the Appropriate Test

Since we're comparing means from more than two groups, we should use a one-way ANOVA test which will help us determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of the different groups.
03

Calculate the Means and Variances

Calculate the mean dissolved oxygen level for each location from the data given. Then, determine the overall mean and the variance both within groups and between groups. This includes computing the sum of squares within (SSW) and the sum of squares between (SSB).
04

Perform ANOVA Calculations

Using the calculated sums of squares, compute the mean square between (MSB) as SSB divided by the degrees of freedom between groups, and mean square within (MSW) as SSW divided by the degrees of freedom within groups. The F-statistic is then calculated as \( F = \frac{MSB}{MSW} \).
05

Determine the Critical Value

Identify the critical value of \( F \) from the F-distribution table for the selected alpha level \( \alpha = 0.05 \), with the appropriate degrees of freedom for the numerator and the denominator.
06

Compare F-statistic to Critical Value

Compare the calculated F-statistic to the critical value. If the F-statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.
07

Conclusion

If the F-statistic exceeds the critical value, it indicates that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean dissolved oxygen levels across the different locations, thus we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of inferential statistics used to determine if there is enough statistical evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition holds true for the entire population. In this process, two competing hypotheses are formed: the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)).- **Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)):** This is the hypothesis that there is no effect or difference. It is what the researcher seeks to disprove.- **Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)):** This hypothesis suggests that there is an effect or a difference.In our dissolved oxygen study, the null hypothesis is that dissolved oxygen levels do not vary among different locations, while the alternative hypothesis posits that at least one location is different in its mean dissolved oxygen level.Hypothesis testing involves:1. **Choosing the Significance Level (\(\alpha\)):** This is the probability of rejecting \(H_0\) when it is actually true. Here, \(\alpha = 0.05\).2. **Calculation of the Test Statistic:** This involves using a formula to determine whether to reject \(H_0\). In our example, this means applying ANOVA.3. **Decision Making:** Compare the test statistic to a critical value from a statistical distribution (such as the F-distribution) to decide whether to reject \(H_0\).
Environmental Statistics
Environmental statistics is a branch of statistics focusing on the analysis of environmental data to inform policy, research, and decision-making. Environmental factors like water quality, air pollution, and soil composition are often monitored and analyzed using statistical techniques to assess public health risks and environmental impacts. - **Water Quality Measurement:** An important aspect of environmental statistics is measuring water quality factors such as dissolved oxygen. These metrics help in monitoring pollution levels and influence environmental regulations. - **Data Collection and Analysis:** Environmental statistics often involve collecting data from various sites and analyzing it to detect trends, make predictions, and evaluate environmental policies. In our case, the dissolved oxygen readings were collected from four different locations along a river to study the potential impact of an industrial discharge. By applying statistical methods, researchers can determine if the plant's discharge affects water quality, leading to actionable insights for environmental protection.
Dissolved Oxygen Measurement
Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a critical parameter in assessing water quality. It refers to the amount of oxygen that is present in water. Healthy water bodies should have high levels of dissolved oxygen, which is vital for the health of aquatic organisms. - **Importance of DO:** Low levels of dissolved oxygen can indicate high levels of pollution, especially from organic waste which requires oxygen to decompose. Aquatic life, including fish and plants, rely on oxygen dissolved in water. In our sample data, dissolved oxygen levels were measured at various locations to assess the impact of a nearby industrial discharge. Lower dissolved oxygen readings signify more pollution, hence degraded water quality. - **Measurement Techniques:** DO is measured using sensors or chemical titration methods. Regular monitoring is crucial for detecting changes in water quality, enforcing environmental laws, and ensuring aquatic ecosystem health.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Charlotte is doing a study on fraud and identity theft based both on source (checks, credit cards, debit cards, online banking/finance sites, other) and on gender of the victim. Describe the sampling method appropriate for a test of independence regarding source of fraud and gender.

The fan blades on commercial jet engines must be replaced when wear on these parts indicates too much variability to pass inspection. If a single fan blade broke during operation, it could severely endanger a flight. A large engine contains thousands of fan blades, and safety regulations require that variability measurements on the population of all blades not exceed \(\sigma^{2}=0.18 \mathrm{~mm}^{2}\). An engine inspector took a random sample of 61 fan blades from an engine. She measured each blade and found a sample variance of \(0.27\) \(\mathrm{mm}^{2}\). Using a \(0.01\) level of significance, is the inspector justified in claiming that all the engine fan blades must be replaced? Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population standard deviation.

Investing: Mutual Funds How reliable are mutual funds that invest in bonds? Again, this depends on the bond fund you buy (see reference in Problem 9). A random sample of annual percentage returns for mutual funds holding shortterm U.S. government bonds is shown below. \(\begin{array}{lllllll}4.6 & 4.7 & 1.9 & 9.3 & -0.8 & 4.1 & 10.5\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}4.2 & 3.5 & 3.9 & 9.8 & -1.2 & 7.3\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=13.59\) for the preceding data. A random sample of annual percentage returns for mutual funds holding intermediate-term corporate bonds is shown below. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}-0.8 & 3.6 & 20.2 & 7.8 & -0.4 & 18.8 & -3.4 & 10.5 \\\ 8.0 & -0.9 & 2.6 & -6.5 & 14.9 & 8.2 & 18.8 & 14.2\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2} \approx 72.06\) for returns from mutual funds holding intermediate-term corporate bonds. Use \(\alpha=0.05\) to test the claim that the population variance for annual percentage returns of mutual funds holding short-term government bonds is different from the population variance for mutual funds holding intermediate- term corporate bonds. How could your test conclusion relate to the question of reliability of returns for each type of mutual fund?

The following problem is based on information taken from Academe, Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors. Let \(x\) represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of \(x\) is approximately \(\sigma^{2}=47.1\). However, a random sample of 15 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that \(x\) has a sample variance \(s^{2}=83.2 .\) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is greater than 47.1. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

The following problem is based on information taken from Accidents in North American Mountaineering (jointly published by The American Alpine Club and The Alpine Club of Canada). Let \(x\) represent the number of mountain climbers killed each year. The long-term variance of \(x\) is approximately \(\sigma^{2}=136.2 .\) Suppose that for the past 8 years, the variance has been \(s^{2}=115.1 .\) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the recent variance for number of mountain climber deaths is less than \(136.2 .\) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.