/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Suppose two variables are positi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose two variables are positively correlated. Does the response variable increase or decrease as the explanatory variable increases?

Short Answer

Expert verified
As the explanatory variable increases, the response variable also increases.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Positive Correlation

A positive correlation between two variables means that as one increases, the other also tends to increase. Both variables move in the same direction.
02

Identify Variables

Recognize the explanatory variable, which is the one you manipulate or observe, and the response variable, which is the outcome you measure as the explanatory variable changes.
03

Apply the Concept of Positive Correlation

Since the question states that the two variables are positively correlated, as the explanatory variable increases, the response variable also increases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Response Variable
In any study or experiment involving variables, the response variable is what researchers are primarily interested in. It's the main factor they want to observe and measure. You can think of it as the effect in a cause-and-effect relationship. For example, if a study is analyzing the impact of study time on test scores, the response variable would be the test scores because that's what changes are being measured.

To identify the response variable, ask yourself what the result of the study's manipulation is. This variable reacts to changes made to another variable, the explanatory variable. Sometimes, it's also called the dependent variable, to highlight its reliance on other factors in the experiment.
Identifying the Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable plays a crucial role in determining the outcomes explored in a study. It's the element that researchers control or choose to observe to see how it impacts the response variable. Often called the independent variable, it acts like the 'cause' in a cause-and-effect scenario.

In our example of studying the relationship between study time and test scores, the amount of time spent studying is the explanatory variable. Researchers manipulate it to see the effect it causes on test scores. The explanatory variable helps set up the framework of an experiment or observation, ensuring that any changes in the response variable can be linked back to variations in this independent variable.
  • This variable does not depend on other variables in the experiment's context.
  • It helps us understand the relationship and how one factor influences another.
Mastering the Step-by-Step Solution
Approaching problems with a step-by-step method is an effective way to gain clarity and avoid overlooking important details. Let’s break down the process like in the original solution to understanding how positive correlation affects variables:

  • Understand Positive Correlation: Know that in a positive relationship, both variables move in the same direction. If one rises, the other also tends to rise.
  • Identify the Variables: Determine which is your explanatory variable (cause) and which is your response variable (effect).
  • Apply the Concept: With positive correlation identified, as you increase the explanatory variable, watch as the response variable also increases.

Utilizing a step-by-step approach not only ensures thorough understanding but also makes the solution more manageable. This technique provides a structured way to approach similar problems in the future, empowering you with a solid problem-solving foundation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the least squares line \(\hat{y}=5+3 x\), what is the marginal change in \(\hat{y}\) for each unit change in \(x ?\)

Aviation and high-altitude physiology is a specialty in the study of medicine. Let \(x=\) partial pressure of oxygen in the alveoli (air cells in the lungs) when breathing naturally available air. Let \(y=\) partial pressure when breathing pure oxygen. The \((x, y)\) data pairs correspond to elevations from 10,000 feet to 30,000 feet in 5000 -foot intervals for a random sample of volunteers. Although the medical data were collected using airplanes, they apply equally well to Mt. Everest climbers (summit 29,028 feet). $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrr} \hline x & 6.7 & 5.1 & 4.2 & 3.3 & 2.1(\text { units: } \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg} / 10) \\ \hline y & 43.6 & 32.9 & 26.2 & 6.2 & 13.9(\text { units: } \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg} / 10) \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (Based on information taken from Medical Physiology by A. C. Guyton, M.D.) (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=21.4, \Sigma y=132.8, \Sigma x^{2}=103.84, \Sigma y^{2}=4125.46, \Sigma x y=\) 652\. 6 , and \(r \approx 0.984\). (b) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\rho>0\). (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 2.5319, a \approx-2.869\), and \(b \approx 6.876\). (d) Find the predicted pressure when breathing pure oxygen if the pressure from breathing available air is \(x=4.0\). (e) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(y\) when \(x=4.0\). (f) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta>0\). (g) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and interpret its meaning.

The following data are based on information from the book Life in America's Small Cities (by G. S. Thomas, Prometheus Books). Let \(x\) be the percentage of 16 - to 19 -year-olds not in school and not high school graduates. Let \(y\) be the reported violent crimes per 1000 residents. Six small cities in Arkansas (Blytheville, El Dorado, Hot Springs, Jonesboro, Rogers, and Russellville) reported the following information about \(x\) and \(y\) : $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrr} \hline x & 24.2 & 19.0 & 18.2 & 14.9 & 19.0 & 17.5 \\ \hline y & 13.0 & 4.4 & 9.3 & 1.3 & 0.8 & 3.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(\Sigma x=112.8, \Sigma y=32.4, \Sigma x^{2}=2167.14\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=290.14, \Sigma x y=665.03\), and \(r \approx 0.764\). (f) If the percentage of 16 - to 19 -year-olds not in school and not graduates reaches \(24 \%\) in a similar city, what is the predicted rate of violent crimes per 1000 residents?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.