/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 For a fixed confidence level, ho... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a fixed confidence level, how does the length of the confidence interval for predicted values of \(y\) change as the corresponding \(x\) values become farther away from \(\bar{x}\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The confidence interval length increases as \(x\) moves farther from \(\bar{x}\) due to increased standard error.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Confidence Interval Formula

Confidence intervals for predicted values of \(y\) in a linear regression model is given by a formula that includes the predicted value \(\hat{y}\), the standard error, and a t or z-value depending on the confidence level. Let's denote the confidence interval as \( \hat{y} \pm t^* SE(\hat{y}) \).
02

Examining the Standard Error Component

The standard error for predicted values generally depends on the distance of \(x\) from the mean \(\bar{x}\). The formula includes a term \( (x - \bar{x})^2 \), which means the farther \(x\) is from \(\bar{x}\), the larger the standard error of the predicted value.
03

Impact on Length of Confidence Interval

Since the width of the confidence interval is twice the product of the critical value \(t^*\) and the standard error \(SE(\hat{y})\), as \(x\) moves farther from \(\bar{x}\), the standard error increases due to increased \((x - \bar{x})^2\) terms, leading to a wider confidence interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Regression
Linear regression is a statistical method used to model the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. The simplest form is simple linear regression, which involves two variables: a predictor or independent variable, often denoted as \(x\), and a response or dependent variable, denoted as \(y\). The main objective is to find the best-fitting line, called the regression line, which can be used to predict the values of \(y\) based on \(x\).
This line is usually represented by the equation \(y = mx + b\), where \(m\) is the slope, indicating how much \(y\) changes for a unit change in \(x\), and \(b\) is the y-intercept, representing the point where the line crosses the y-axis.
In practice, linear regression minimizes the sum of squared differences between the observed values and the values predicted by the line. This method assumes a linear relationship between the variables, constant variance, and normally distributed residuals, among other things.
Linear regression is highly valuable in understanding relationships and making predictions within data, essential in fields ranging from economics to engineering.
Standard Error
The standard error measures the accuracy of predictions in the context of regression analysis. It essentially quantifies the variability or spread of the predicted values from the actual ones. Specifically, when making predictions using a regression model, the standard error gives us an idea of the typical distance between the observed values and the model's predictions.
In linear regression, the standard error of predicted values is partly calculated using the formula that includes a term \((x - \bar{x})^2\). This term emphasizes the important role of distance from the mean (\(\bar{x}\)), in determining the spread of predicted values. The further the \(x\) is from \(\bar{x}\), the greater the potential variation, leading to a larger standard error.
Having a large standard error implies that predictions have high uncertainty and are less reliable. Conversely, a smaller standard error signifies that your model's predictions are likely closer to the actual values, thus more reliable."
In confidence intervals, the standard error directly affects the width of the interval. A larger error broadens the interval, reflecting greater uncertainty.
Predicted Values
Predicted values in linear regression are the estimates of the dependent variable, \(y\), based on given values of the independent variable, \(x\). These values are calculated using the equation of the regression line, typically noted as \(\hat{y} = mx + b\). Here, \(\hat{y}\) represents the predicted value.
The predicted values are central to many analyses, as they form the basis for further statistical applications such as constructing confidence intervals and performing hypothesis tests. A confidence interval around a predicted value provides a range where the true value of \(y\) is expected to fall, given a certain level of confidence.
While making predictions, it's essential to understand that predicted values might differ from actual observations due to random error or the inability of a linear model to perfectly capture complex relationships. This is where confidence intervals help, offering a buffer for this uncertainty.
  • Predicted values help researchers and analysts make informed decisions by assessing trends and potential outcomes.
  • In practical scenarios, these values guide strategic planning and resource allocation with data-driven insights.
Understanding predicted values in terms of their reliability and the associated uncertainty can considerably elevate one's comprehension and deductive capabilities in data analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given the linear regression equation \(x_{3}=-16.5+4.0 x_{1}+9.2 x_{4}-1.1 x_{7}\) (a) Which variable is the response variable? Which variables are the explanatory variables? (b) Which number is the constant term? List the coefficients with their corresponding explanatory variables. (c) If \(x_{1}=10, x_{4}=-1\), and \(x_{7}=2\), what is the predicted value for \(x_{3}\) ? (d) Explain how each coefficient can be thought of as a "slope." Suppose \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{7}\) were held as fixed but arbitrary values. If \(x_{4}\) increased by 1 unit, what would we expect the corresponding change in \(x_{3}\) to be? If \(x_{4}\) increased by 3 units, what would be the corresponding expected change in \(x_{3} ?\) If \(x_{4}\) decreased by 2 units, what would we expect for the corresponding change in \(x_{3}\) ? (e) Suppose that \(n=15\) data points were used to construct the given regression equation and that the standard error for the coefficient of \(x_{4}\) is \(0.921\). Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the coefficient of \(x_{4}\). (f) Using the information of part (e) and level of significance \(1 \%\), test the claim that the coefficient of \(x_{4}\) is different from zero. Explain how the conclusion has a bearing on the regression equation.

Fuming because you are stuck in traffic? Roadway congestion is a costly item, both in time wasted and fuel wasted. Let \(x\) represent the average annual hours per person spent in traffic delays and let \(y\) represent the average annual gallons of fuel wasted per person in traffic delays. A random sample of eight cities showed the following data. (Reference: Statistical Abstract of the United States, 122 nd edition.) $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} \hline x(\mathrm{hr}) & 28 & 5 & 20 & 35 & 20 & 23 & 18 & 5 \\ \hline y(\mathrm{gal}) & 48 & 3 & 34 & 55 & 34 & 38 & 28 & 9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Draw a scatter diagram for the data. Verify that \(\Sigma x=154, \Sigma x^{2}=3712\), \(\Sigma y=249, \Sigma y^{2}=9959\), and \(\Sigma x y=6067 .\) Compute \(r .\) The data in part (a) represent average annual hours lost per person and average annual gallons of fuel wasted per person in traffic delays. Suppose that instead of using average data for different cities, you selected one person at random from each city and measured the annual number of hours lost \(x\) for that person and the annual gallons of fuel wasted \(y\) for the same person. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} \hline x(\mathrm{hr}) & 20 & 4 & 18 & 42 & 15 & 25 & 2 & 35 \\ \hline y(\mathrm{gal}) & 60 & 8 & 12 & 50 & 21 & 30 & 4 & 70 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (b) Compute \(\bar{x}\) and \(\bar{y}\) for both sets of data pairs and compare the averages. Compute the sample standard deviations \(s_{x}\) and \(s_{y}\) for both sets of data pairs and compare the standard deviations. In which set are the standard deviations for \(x\) and \(y\) larger? Look at the defining formula for \(r\), Equation 1 . Why do smaller standard deviations \(s_{x}\) and \(s_{y}\) tend to increase the value of \(r\) ? (c) Make a scatter diagram for the second set of data pairs. Verify that \(\sum x=\) 161, \(\Sigma x^{2}=4583, \Sigma y=255, \Sigma y^{2}=12,565\), and \(\Sigma x y=7071\). Compute \(r\) (d) Compare \(r\) from part (a) with \(r\) from part (b). Do the data for averages have a higher correlation coefficient than the data for individual measurements? List some reasons why you think hours lost per individual and fuel wasted per individual might vary more than the same quantities averaged over all the people in a city.

The initial visual impact of a scatter diagram depends on the scales used on the \(x\) and \(y\) axes. Consider the following data: $$ \begin{array}{l|llllll} \hline x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \hline y & 1 & 4 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a scatter diagram using the same scale on both the \(x\) and \(y\) axes (i.e make sure the unit lengths on the two axes are equal). (b) Make a scatter diagram using a scale on the \(y\) axis that is twice as long a that on the \(x\) axis. (c) Make a scatter diagram using a scale on the \(y\) axis that is half as long as tha on the \(x\) axis. (d) On each of the three graphs, draw the straight line that you think best fit the data points. How do the slopes (or directions) of the three lines appea to change? (Note: The actual slopes will be the same; they just appea different because of the choice of scale factors.)

Suppose two variables are negatively correlated. Does the response variable increase or decrease as the explanatory variable increases?

(a) Suppose you are given the following \(x, y\) data pairs: $$ \begin{array}{l|lll} \hline x & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline y & 2 & 1 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Show that the least-squares equation for these data is \(y=1.071 x+0.143\) (rounded to three digits after the decimal). (b) Now suppose you are given these \(x, y\) data pairs: $$ \begin{array}{l|lll} \hline x & 2 & 1 & 6 \\ \hline y & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Show that the least-squares equation for these data is \(y=0.357 x+1.595\) (rounded to three digits after the decimal). (c) In the data for parts (a) and (b), did we simply exchange the \(x\) and \(y\) values of each data pair? (d) Solve \(y=0.143+1.071 x\) for \(x .\) Do you get the least-squares equation of part (b) with the symbols \(x\) and \(y\) exchanged? (e) In general, suppose we have the least-squares equation \(y=a+b x\) for a set of data pairs \(x, y .\) If we solve this equation for \(x\), will we necessarily get the least-squares equation for the set of data pairs \(y, x\) (with \(x\) and \(y\) exchanged)? Explain using parts (a) through (d).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.