/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Is the magnitude of an earthquak... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is the magnitude of an earthquake related to the depth below the surface at which the quake occurs? Let \(x\) be the magnitude of an earthquake (on the Richter scale), and let \(y\) be the depth (in kilometers) of the quake below the surface at the epicenter. The following is based on information taken from the National Earthquake Information Service of the U.S. Geological Survey. Additional data may be found by visiting the Brase/Brase statistics site at college.hmco.com/pic/braseUs9e and finding the link to earthquakes. $$ \begin{array}{c|crrrrrr} \hline x & 2.9 & 4.2 & 3.3 & 4.5 & 2.6 & 3.2 & 3.4 \\ \hline y & 5.0 & 10.0 & 11.2 & 10.0 & 7.9 & 3.9 & 5.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a scatter diagram and draw the line you think best fits the data. (b) Would you say the correlation is low, moderate, or strong? positive or negative? (c) Use a calculator to verify that \(\Sigma x=24.1, \Sigma x^{2}=85.75, \Sigma y=53.5, \Sigma y^{2}=\) \(458.31\), and \(\Sigma x y=190.18\). Compute \(r\). As \(x\) increases, does the value of \(y\) imply that \(y\) should tend to increase or decrease? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is a weak and positive correlation between magnitude and depth.

Step by step solution

01

Plot the Scatter Diagram

First, create a scatter plot with the given data points. Place the magnitude of the earthquake on the x-axis and the depth on the y-axis. Plot each corresponding pair \((x, y)\) on the graph. This visual representation will help determine the correlation pattern between the two variables.
02

Draw the Best Fit Line

Observe the scatter plot and draw a line that you believe best fits the trend of the data points. This line should capture the overall direction and pattern of the data. Consider if most of the points lie close to a straight line, which suggests a linear relationship.
03

Assess Correlation Strength and Direction

Evaluate the scatter plot to describe the correlation. If points are clustered closely around the line, the correlation is strong; if not, it is weak. Check if the line has a positive slope (upward from left to right), indicating a positive correlation, or a negative slope, indicating a negative correlation.
04

Compute Correlation Coefficient r

Using the provided sums, calculate the correlation coefficient \( r \). Use the formula: \[r = \frac{n(\Sigma xy) - (\Sigma x)(\Sigma y)}{\sqrt{[n\Sigma x^2 - (\Sigma x)^2][n\Sigma y^2 - (\Sigma y)^2]}}\]where \(n\) is the number of data points. Plug in \(n=7\), \(\Sigma x=24.1\), \(\Sigma y=53.5\), \(\Sigma xy=190.18\), \(\Sigma x^2=85.75\), and \(\Sigma y^2=458.31\) to calculate \(r\).
05

Interpret the Correlation Coefficient

Once you've calculated \(r\), interpret its value. If \(r\) is close to 1 or -1, the correlation is strong; if it's close to 0, the correlation is weak. A positive \(r\) value indicates that as the earthquake magnitude increases, the depth tends to increase. A negative \(r\) suggests the opposite.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \( r \), is a statistical measure that calculates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables on a scatter plot. It ranges from -1 to 1. If \( r \) is close to 1, this indicates a strong positive relationship, meaning when one variable increases, the other tends to increase as well. Conversely, if \( r \) is close to -1, it signifies a strong negative relationship, where an increase in one variable tends to lead to a decrease in the other. When \( r \) is closer to 0, it suggests that there is little to no linear correlation between the variables.

In the context of earthquake data analysis, calculating the correlation coefficient helps in understanding the relationship between the magnitude of earthquakes and their depth. This analysis can provide insights into whether stronger earthquakes are generally deeper or shallower compared to weaker ones. By computing \( r \), students can assess whether there's a tendency for the depth to increase or decrease as the magnitude increases.
Scatter Plot
A scatter plot is a graph used to visualize the relationship between two numerical variables. On this graph, each point represents an observation from the dataset with one variable plotted on the x-axis and the other on the y-axis. This allows us to observe potential relationships or patterns.

In this exercise, the scatter plot is used to show the relationship between earthquake magnitude (on the x-axis) and depth (on the y-axis). By examining the distribution and pattern of the data points, you can get an initial sense of whether there's a relationship between these two variables. If the points roughly form a linear shape, either increasing or decreasing, it suggests a linear relationship. The scatter plot can reveal outliers, clusters, or trends that aren't immediately apparent from the raw data alone.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship suggests that there is a constant rate of change between two variables. If one variable increases or decreases by a specific amount, the other variable changes by a consistent and proportionate amount as well.

In the case of our earthquake data, a linear relationship would mean that as the magnitude of an earthquake changes, the depth changes consistently. After plotting the scatter plot, if you notice a trend where the data points tend to align closely around a straight line, this indicates a linear relationship.

The notion of a linear relationship is crucial in predicting and understanding patterns within data. For instance, if we determine a positive linear relationship between magnitude and depth, it implies that deeper earthquakes tend to be stronger. This can have real-world implications for how we prepare for and respond to such natural events.
Earthquake Data Analysis
Earthquake data analysis involves examining various aspects of seismic activity, which primarily includes the magnitude and depth of earthquakes. By analyzing this data, researchers and statisticians can uncover patterns and relationships that help in understanding seismic behavior.

The exercise presented aims to investigate whether there's a significant correlation between an earthquake's magnitude and its depth. By assessing this relationship using tools such as scatter plots and correlation coefficients, students can develop insights into whether stronger earthquakes generally occur at greater depths or not.

This kind of analysis is essential not just for students learning statistical methods, but it also provides value in seismology and disaster preparedness. Understanding the relationship between magnitude and depth is key to predicting potential impacts of earthquakes and can guide construction practices in earthquake-prone areas. This analysis demonstrates the application of statistical tools in real-world scenarios, emphasizing the importance of data in decision-making and policy planning.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data are based on information from the book Life in America's Small Cities (by G. S. Thomas, Prometheus Books). Let \(x\) be the percentage of 16 - to 19 -year-olds not in school and not high school graduates. Let \(y\) be the reported violent crimes per 1000 residents. Six small cities in Arkansas (Blytheville, El Dorado, Hot Springs, Jonesboro, Rogers, and Russellville) reported the following information about \(x\) and \(y\) : $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrr} \hline x & 24.2 & 19.0 & 18.2 & 14.9 & 19.0 & 17.5 \\ \hline y & 13.0 & 4.4 & 9.3 & 1.3 & 0.8 & 3.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(\Sigma x=112.8, \Sigma y=32.4, \Sigma x^{2}=2167.14\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=290.14, \Sigma x y=665.03\), and \(r \approx 0.764\). (f) If the percentage of 16 - to 19 -year-olds not in school and not graduates reaches \(24 \%\) in a similar city, what is the predicted rate of violent crimes per 1000 residents?

For a fixed confidence level, how does the length of the confidence interval for predicted values of \(y\) change as the corresponding \(x\) values become farther away from \(\bar{x}\) ?

Data for this problem are based on information taken from The Wall Street Journal. Let \(x\) be the age in years of a licensed automobile driver. Let \(y\) be the percentage of all fatal accidents (for a given age) due to speeding. For example, the first data pair indicates that \(36 \%\) of all fatal accidents of \(17-\) year-olds are due to speeding. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} \hline x & 17 & 27 & 37 & 47 & 57 & 67 & 77 \\ \hline y & 36 & 25 & 20 & 12 & 10 & 7 & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(\Sigma x=329, \Sigma y=115, \Sigma x^{2}=18,263\), \(\Sigma y^{2}=2639, \Sigma x y=4015\), and \(r \approx-0.959 .\) (f) Predict the percentage of all fatal accidents due to speeding for 25 -year-olds.

When we take measurements of the same general type, a power law of the form \(y=\alpha x^{\beta}\) often gives an excellent fit to the data. A lot of research has been conducted as to why power laws work so well in business, economics, biology, ecology, medicine, engineering, social science, and so on. Let us just say that if you do not have a good straight-line fit to data pairs \((x, y)\), and the scatter plot does not rise dramatically (as in exponential growth), then a power law is often a good choice. College algebra can be used to show that power law models become linear when we apply logarithmic transformations to both variables. To see how this is done, please read on. Note: For power law models, we assume all \(x>0\) and all \(y>0\). Suppose we have data pairs \((x, y)\) and we want to find constants \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) such that \(y=\alpha x^{\beta}\) is a good fit to the data. First, make the logarithmic transformations \(x^{\prime}=\log x\) and \(y^{\prime}=\log y .\) Next, use the \(\left(x^{\prime}, y^{\prime}\right)\) data pairs and a calculator with linear regression keys to obtain the least-squares equation \(y^{\prime}=a+b x^{\prime} .\) Note that the equation \(y^{\prime}=a+b x^{\prime}\) is the same as \(\log y=a+b(\log x)\). If we raise both sides of this equation to the power 10 and use some college algebra, we get \(y=10^{a}(x)^{b} .\) In other words, for the power law model \(y=\alpha x^{\beta}\), we have \(\alpha \approx 10^{a}\) and \(\beta \approx b\). In the electronic design of a cell phone circuit, the buildup of electric current (Amps) is an important function of time (microseconds). Let \(x=\) time in microseconds and let \(y=\) Amps built up in the circuit at time \(x\). $$ \begin{array}{c|ccccc} \hline x & 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 & 10 \\ \hline y & 1.81 & 2.90 & 3.20 & 3.68 & 4.11 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make the logarithmic transformations \(x^{\prime}=\log x\) and \(y^{\prime}=\log y .\) Then make a scatter plot of the \(\left(x^{\prime}, y^{\prime}\right)\) values. Does a linear equation seem to be a good fit to this plot? (b) Use the \(\left(x^{\prime}, y^{\prime}\right)\) data points and a calculator with regression keys to find the least-squares equation \(y^{\prime}=a+b x^{\prime} .\) What is the correlation coefficient? (c) Use the results of part (b) to find estimates for \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) in the power law \(y=\) \(\alpha x^{\beta .}\) Write the power law giving the relationship between time and Amp buildup. Note: The TI-84Plus calculator fully supports the power law model. Place the original \(x\) data in list \(\mathrm{L} 1\) and the corresponding \(y\) data in list \(\mathrm{L} 2 .\) Then press STAT, followed by CALC, and scroll down to option A: PwrReg. The output gives values for \(\alpha, \beta\), and the correlation coefficient \(r\).

Parts \((\mathrm{a})\) and \((\mathrm{b})\) relate to testing \(\rho .\) Part \((\mathrm{c})\) requests the value of \(S_{e} .\) Parts (d) and (e) relate to confidence intervals for prediction. Parts (f) and (g) relate to testing \(\beta\) and finding confidence intervals for \(\beta\). Answers may vary due to rounding. Let \(x\) be a random variable that represents the batting average of a professional baseball player. Let \(y\) be a random variable that represents the percentage of strikeouts of a professional baseball player. A random sample of \(n=6\) professional baseball players gave the following information. (Reference: The Baseball Encyclopedia, Macmillan.) $$ \begin{array}{l|llllll} \hline x & 0.328 & 0.290 & 0.340 & 0.248 & 0.367 & 0.269 \\ \hline y & 3.2 & 7.6 & 4.0 & 8.6 & 3.1 & 11.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=1.842, \Sigma y=37.6, \Sigma x^{2}=0.575838, \Sigma y^{2}=290.78, \Sigma x y=\) 10.87, and \(r \approx-0.891\). (b) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\rho \neq 0\). (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 1.6838, a \approx 26.247\), and \(b \approx-65.081\). (d) Find the predicted percentage of strikeouts for a player with an \(x=0.300\) batting average. (e) Find an \(80 \%\) confidence interval for \(y\) when \(x=0.300\). (f) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta \neq 0\). (g) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and interpret its meaning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.