/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 73 If the ancient Greek god Zeus co... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 3: Problem 73

If the ancient Greek god Zeus could do anything, could he create a rock so huge that he could not move it? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Due to the properties of omnipotence, Zeus, if omnipotent indeed, should be able to both create a rock of any size, and move a rock of any size. Inability to do either would suggest a limit to his power and he would not thus be omnipotent. Therefore, the paradox is resolved by understanding omnipotence itself: an omnipotent being like Zeus would possess the capacity to both create a rock of any size and also move a rock of any size.

Step by step solution

01

Interpreting the Question

This exercise asks if the Greek god Zeus, who is omnipotent, could create a rock so big that he himself could not move it. This implies a paradox as being omnipotent, Zeus should be able to do anything; but if he can create a rock he cannot move, there's something he cannot do. Therefore, the question is to resolve this paradox.
02

Understanding Omnipotence

Omnipotence means unlimited power. Someone who is omnipotent has the ability to do anything. This should mean that Zeus, being omnipotent, should be able to both create a rock of any size, and move a rock of any size.
03

Applying Omnipotence to Zeus

The question targets the unlimited powers of the omnipotent. So, if Zeus is really omnipotent, he should be able to move the rock of any size that he can create, because being unable to move the rock would contradict the concept of his omnipotence.
04

Resolving the Paradox

\'Could Zeus create a rock so big that he himself could not move it?\' This becomes a contradiction if you conclude that there is a limit to his power, in which case he would not be omnipotent. Therefore, the resolution of this paradox lies in understanding omnipotence itself: Zeus, if omnipotent, would possess the capacity to both create a rock of any size and also move a rock of any size.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Translate each argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. You may use a truth table or, if applicable, compare the argument's symbolic form to a standard valid or invalid form. (You can ignore differences in past, present, and future tense.) There must be a dam or there is flooding. This year there is flooding. \(\therefore\) This year there is no dam.

In Exercises 43-50, use the standard forms of valid arguments to draw a valid conclusion from the given premises. If a person is a chemist, then that person has a college degree. My best friend does not have a college degree. Therefore, ...

Use Euler diagrams to determine whether each argument is valid or invalid. All clocks keep time accurately. All time-measuring devices keep time accurately. Therefore, all clocks are time-measuring devices.

17 on this test is difficult. This is the case because the test was made up by Professor Flunkem and Flunkem's exams are alw鈥� # I know, without even looking, that question #17 on this test is difficult. This is the case because the test was made up by Professor Flunkem and Flunkem's exams are always difficult.

Draw what you believe is a valid conclusion in the form of a disjunction for the following argument. Then verify that the argument is valid for your conclusion. "Inevitably, the use of the placebo involved built-in contradictions. A good patient-doctor relationship is essential to the process, but what happens to that relationship when one of the partners conceals important information from the other? If the doctor tells the truth, he destroys the base on which the placebo rests. If he doesn't tell the truth, he jeopardizes a relationship built on trust."
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.