/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 58. Age and height A random sample o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Age and height A random sample of 195 students was selected from the United Kingdom using the Census At School data selector. The age x (in years) and height y (in centimeters) were recorded for each student. Here is a scatterplot with the least-squares regression line y^=106.1+4.21x. For this model, s = 8.61 and r2 = 0.274.

a. Calculate and interpret the residual for the student who was 141 cm tall at age 10.

b. Interpret the slope of the least-squares regression line.

c. Interpret the value of s.

d. Interpret the value of r2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) The residual is 7.2

Part (b) The height increases by 4.21cm per year on average.

Part (c) The predicted height of a pupil using the least square regression equation is 8.61cm shorter than the actual height of the student.

Part (d) The least square regression line employing age as an explanatory variable may explain 27.4percent of the variation in height.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

02

Part (a) Step 2: Calculation

The relationship between the height and age of the students is given in the question. And the regression line is as:

y=106.1+4.21x

And also given that the student was 141cmtall at age 10Thus, we have,

x=10y=141

Thus the predicted height of the student is as:

y=106.1+4.21x

=106.1+4.21(10)=148.2

Thus, the residual will be calculated as:

Residual=yy=141148.2=7.2

This means that while using the regression line to make a prediction, we overestimated the height of the student at age 10 by 7.2cm

03

Part (b) Step 1: Calculation

The question specifies the relationship between the students' height and age. The regression line is as follows:

y=106.1+4.21x

Also, at the age of ten, the pupil was 141 cm tall. As a result,

x=10y=141

The slope in the least square regression equation is the coefficient of x, and it indicates the average rise or decrease of y per unit of x Thus,

b1=4.21

As a result, the height increases by 4.21 cm per year on average.

04

Part (c) Step 1: Calculation

The question specifies the relationship between the students' height and age. The regression line is as follows:

y=106.1+4.21x

Also, at the age of ten, the pupil was 141 cm tall. As a result,

x=10y=141

s=8.61 is the value of s. The standard error of the estimations, as we all know, is the average error of forecasts, and thus the average difference between actual and predicted values. Thus, using the equation of least square regression line deviation, a student's anticipated height differs by 8.61cmfrom his or her actual height.

05

Part (d) Step 1: Calculation

The question specifies the relationship between the students' height and age. The regression line is as follows:

y=106.1+4.21x

Also, we have, given that the pupil was 141 cm tall at the age of ten,

x=10y=141

And the value of r2is,

r2=0.274=27.4%

The coefficient of determination, as we know, is a measurement of how much variation in the answers y variable is explained by the least square regression model with the explanatory variable. As a result, the least square regression line employing age as an explanatory variable may explain 27.4percent of the variation in height.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The scatterplot shows the relationship between the number of people per television set and the number of people per physician for 40 countries, along with the least-squares regression line. In Ethiopia, there were 503 people per TV and 36,660 people per doctor. Which of the following is correct?

a. Increasing the number of TVs in a country will attract more doctors.

b. The slope of the least-squares regression line is less than 1.

c. The correlation is greater than 1.

d. The point for Ethiopia is decreasing the slope of the least-squares regression line.

e. Ethiopia has more people per doctor than expected, based on how many people it has per TV.

Managing diabetes People with diabetes measure their fasting plasma glucose (FPG, measured in milligrams per milliliter) after fasting for at least 8 hours. Another measurement, made at regular medical checkups, is called HbA. This is roughly the percent of red blood cells that have a glucose molecule attached. It measures average exposure to glucose over a period of several months. The table gives data on both HbA and FPG for 18 diabetics five months after they had completed a diabetes education class.

a. Make a scatterplot with HbA as the explanatory variable. Describe what you see.

b. Subject 18 is an outlier in the x-direction. What effect do you think this subject has on the correlation? What effect do you think this subject has on the equation of the least-squares regression line? Calculate the correlation and equation of the least-squares regression line with and without this subject to confirm your answer.

c. Subject 15 is an outlier in the y-direction. What effect do you think this subject has on the correlation? What effect do you think this subject has on the equation of the least-squares regression line? Calculate the correlation and equation of the least-squares regression line with and without this subject to confirm your answer.

More brains Refer to Exercise 20

a. Explain why it isn鈥檛 correct to say that the correlation is 0.86g/kg

b. What would happen to the correlation if the variables were reversed on the scatterplot?

Explain your reasoning.

c. What would happen to the correlation if brain weight was measured in kilograms instead of grams? Explain your reasoning.

Teaching and research A college newspaper interviews a psychologist about student ratings of the teaching of faculty members. The psychologist says, 鈥淭he evidence indicates that the correlation between the research productivity and teaching rating of faculty members is close to zero.鈥 The paper reports this as 鈥淧rofessor McDaniel said that good researchers tend to be poor teachers, and vice versa.鈥 Explain why the paper鈥檚 report is wrong. Write a statement in plain language (don鈥檛 use the word correlation) to explain the psychologist鈥檚 meaning.

Longer strides In Exercise 43, we summarized the relationship between x =

height of a student (in inches) and y = number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway, with the regression line y^=113.6鈭0.921x. For this

model, technology gives s = 3.50 and r2 = 0.399.

a. Interpret the value of s.

b. Interpret the value of r2.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.