/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 55. Longer strides In Exercise 43, w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Longer strides In Exercise 43, we summarized the relationship between x =

height of a student (in inches) and y = number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway, with the regression line y^=113.6−0.921x. For this

model, technology gives s = 3.50 and r2 = 0.399.

a. Interpret the value of s.

b. Interpret the value of r2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) The predicted number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway differed on average by 3.50steps from the actual number of steps required to travel the length of a school hallway.

Part (b) The least-square regression line utilizing a student's height as an explanatory variable can explain 39.9% of the variation in the number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

The question specifies the link between xa student's height, and y the number of steps required to travel the length of a school corridor.

The regression line is as:

yÁåœ=113.6−0.921x

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

And s=3.50 is the value of s. The standard error of the estimations, as we all know, is the average error of forecasts, and thus the average difference between actual and predicted values. Thus, using the equation of least square regression line, the predicted number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway differed on average by 3.50 steps from the actual number of steps required to travel the length of a school hallway.

03

Part (b) Step 1: Explanation

The regression line is as:

yÁåœ=113.6−0.921x

And the value r2is,

r2=0.399=39.9%

The coefficient of determination, as we know, is a measurement of how much variation in the answers y variable is explained by the least square regression model with the explanatory variable. As a result, the least square regression line utilizing a student's height as an explanatory variable can explain39.9% of the variation in the number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Late bloomers? Japanese cherry trees tend to blossom early when spring weather is warm and later when spring weather is cool. Here are some data on the average March temperature (in degrees Celsius) and the day in April when the first cherry blossom appeared over a 24-year period:

a. Make a well-labeled scatterplot that’s suitable for predicting when the cherry trees will blossom from the temperature. Which variable did you choose as the explanatory variable? Explain your reasoning.

b. Use technology to calculate the correlation and the equation of the least-squares regression line. Interpret the slope and y-intercept of the line in this setting.

c. Suppose that the average March temperature this year was 8.2°C. Would you be willing to use the equation in part (b) to predict the date of the first blossom? Explain your reasoning.

d. Calculate and interpret the residual for the year when the average March temperature was 4.5°C.

e. Use technology to help construct a residual plot. Describe what you see.

Long-term records from the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania show interesting ecological relationships. When wildebeest are more abundant, they graze the grass more heavily, so there are fewer fires and more trees grow. Lions feed more successfully when there are more trees, so the lion population increases. Researchers collected data on one part of this cycle, wildebeest abundance (in thousands of animals) and the percent of the grass area burned in the same year. The results of a least-squares regression on the data are shown here.


a. Is a linear model appropriate for describing the relationship between wildebeest abundance and percent of grass area burned? Explain.

b. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Interpret the slope. Does the value of the y-intercept have meaning in this context? If so, interpret the y-intercept. If not, explain why.

d. Interpret the standard deviation of the residuals and r2.

a. Is a line an appropriate model to use for these data? Explain how you know.

b. Find the correlation.

c. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? Define any variables that you

use.

d. Interpret the values of s and r2.

More mess? When Mentos are dropped into a newly opened bottle of Diet

Coke, carbon dioxide is released from the Diet Coke very rapidly, causing the Diet Coke to be expelled from the bottle. To see if using more Mentos causes more Diet Coke to be expelled, Brittany and Allie used twenty-four 2-cup bottles of Diet Coke and randomly assigned each bottle to receive either 2, 3, 4, or 5 Mentos. After waiting for the fizzing to stop, they measured the amount expelled (in cups) by subtracting the amount remaining from the original amount in the bottle.29 Here is some computer output from a regression of y = amount expelled on x = number of Mentos:

a. Is a line an appropriate model to use for these data? Explain how you know.

b. Find the correlation.

c. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? Define any variables that you use.

d. Interpret the values of s and r2.

The stock market Some people think that the behavior of the stock market in January predicts its behavior for the rest of the year. Take the explanatory variable xto be the percent change in a stock market index in January and the response variable yto be the change in the index for the entire year. We expect a positive correlation between xand y because the change during January contributes to the full year’s change. Calculation from data for an 18-year period gives

x¯=1.75%sz=5.36%y¯=9.07%sy=15.35%r=0.596

(a) What percent of the observed variation in yearly changes in the index is explained by a straight-line relationship with the change during January?

(b) For these data, s=8.3Explain what this value means

In addition to the regression line, the report on the Mumbai measurements says that r2 =0.95. This suggests that

a. although arm span and height are correlated, arm span does not predict height very accurately.

b. height increases by 0.95=0.97 cm for each additional centimeter of arm

span.

c. 95% of the relationship between height and arm span is accounted for by the regression line.

d. 95% of the variation in height is accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span. e. 95% of the height measurements are accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.