/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Multiple choice: Select the best... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Multiple choice: Select the best answer for Exercises, which are based on the following information. To determine property taxes, Florida reappraises real estate every year, and the county appraiser's Web site lists the current "fair market value" of each piece of property. Property usually sells for somewhat more than the appraised market value. We collected data on the appraised market values \(x\) and actual selling prices \(y\) (in thousands of dollars) of a random sample of 16 condominium units in Florida. We checked that the conditions for inference about the slope of the population regression line are met. Here is part of the Minitab output from a least-squares regression analysis using these data. \({ }^{13}\) $$ \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 127.27 & 79.49 & 1.60 & 0.132 \\ \text { Appraisal } & 1.0466 & 0.1126 & 9.29 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~S}=69.7299 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=86.1 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =85.1 \% \end{array} $$ Is there convincing evidence that selling price increases as appraised value increases? To answer this question, test the hypotheses (a) \(\quad H_{0}: \beta=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta > 0\). (b) \(H_{0}: \beta=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta < 0\). (c) \(\quad H_{0}: \beta=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta \neq 0\). (d) \(H_{0}: \beta > 0\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta=0\). (e) \(\quad H_{0}: \beta=1\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta>1\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Test (a) \( H_0: \beta = 0 \) vs. \( H_a: \beta > 0 \) shows convincing evidence of a positive relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Regression Equation Coefficient

The coefficient of the 'Appraisal' in the regression output is 1.0466. This represents the estimated change in the selling price (in thousands of dollars) for each 1 unit (thousand dollars) increase in the appraised value.
02

Determine the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

We need to test if there is a relationship between the appraised value and the selling price. This corresponds to testing if the slope \( \beta eq 0 \). Thus, the appropriate hypotheses are \( H_0: \beta = 0 \) and \( H_a: \beta > 0 \).
03

Analyze the P-value

The P-value for the 'Appraisal' coefficient is 0.000. A P-value of 0.000 (significantly lower than 0.05) indicates strong evidence against \( H_0 \), so we reject \( H_0 \) in favor of \( H_a \).
04

Evaluate the Hypotheses

The evidence suggests that there is a strong positive relationship between the appraised value and the selling price, implying that the selling price increases as the appraised value increases. Hence, the correct choice aligns with the hypothesis test \( (a) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
In statistical analysis, hypothesis testing is a method used to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer a condition for the entire population. It involves the formulation of two mutually exclusive statements, known as the null hypothesis ( H_0 ) and the alternative hypothesis ( H_a ). The null hypothesis is the default assumption that there is no effect or no difference, while the alternative hypothesis is what you aim to evidence.

In the context of regression analysis, hypothesis testing is often used to determine if there is a meaningful relationship between variables. Specifically, we test the slope ( β ) of the regression line. For the given problem relating to property values, the null hypothesis ( H_0: β = 0 ) suggests that there is no relationship between the appraised value and selling price, while the alternative hypothesis ( H_a: β > 0 ) suggests that as the appraised value increases, the selling price is expected to increase as well.
  • Null hypothesis ( H_0 ): No change in selling price with changes in appraised value.
  • Alternative hypothesis ( H_a ): Selling price increases with appraised value.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a statistical method that models the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables by fitting a linear equation to observed data. In simple linear regression, we deal with two variables, where one is an independent variable (x) and the other is a dependent variable (y).

The regression line is represented by the equation \( y = β_0 + β_1x \), where \( β_0 \) is the y-intercept, and \( β_1 \) is the slope. The slope informs us about the change in the dependent variable for a one-unit change in the independent variable.

In this exercise, the appraised values are the independent variable (x), and the actual selling prices are the dependent variable (y). The coefficient of the appraisal, 1.0466, indicates that for every \(1,000 increase in appraised value, the selling price increases by about \)1,046.60 on average.
P-value Analysis
P-value analysis helps assess the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. It is the probability of observing the test results, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

In hypothesis testing, a low P-value signifies strong evidence against the null hypothesis. Conventionally, a P-value threshold of 0.05 is used. A P-value less than 0.05 suggests that what we have observed is statistically significant, warranting a rejection of the null hypothesis.

In the Minitab output for the real estate regression, the P-value for the appraisal coefficient is reported as 0.000. This very low P-value strongly suggests that the relationship between appraised value and selling price is significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Slope Interpretation
Understanding the slope in regression analysis is crucial for interpreting the data relationships. The slope ( β_1 ) in the regression equation represents the average change in the dependent variable for each one-unit change in the independent variable.

In this particular exercise, the slope of the regression line is 1.0466. This means that for every $1,000 increase in the appraised value of the property, the selling price is expected to increase by approximately $1,046.60 on average. A positive slope like this indicates a direct or positive relationship between the two variables.
  • A positive slope suggests that the dependent variable increases as the independent variable increases.
  • If the slope was negative, it would suggest an inverse relationship.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 25 to 28 refer to the following setting. Does the color in which words are printed affect your ability to read them? Do the words themselves affect your ability to name the color in which they are printed? Mr. Starnes designed a study to investigate these questions using the 16 students in his AP \(^{\text {R }}\) Statistics class as subjects. Each student performed two tasks in a random order while a partner timed: ( 1 ) read 32 words aloud as quickly as possible, and ( 2 ) say the color in which each of 32 words is printed as quickly as possible. Try both tasks for yourself using the word list below $$ \begin{array}{llll} \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } \\ \text { RED } & \text { GREEN } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { YELLOW } \\ \text { GREEN } & \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { BLUE } \\ \text { YELLOW } & \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } & \text { RED } \\ \text { BLUE } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { RED } \\ \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { GREN } \\ \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } & \text { GREEN } & \text { BLUE } \\ \text { GREEN } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { YELLOW } \end{array} $$ Color words (4.2) Let's review the design of the study. (a) Explain why this was an experiment and not an observational study. (b) Did Mr. Starnes use a completely randomized design or a randomized block design? Why do you think he chose this experimental design? (c) Explain the purpose of the random assignment in the context of the study. The data from Mr. Starnes's experiment are shown below. For each subject, the time to perform the two tasks is given to the nearest second. $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { Words } & \text { Colors } & \text { Subject } & \text { Words } & \text { Colors } \\ 1 & 13 & 20 & 9 & 10 & 16 \\ 2 & 10 & 21 & 10 & 9 & 13 \\ 3 & 15 & 22 & 11 & 11 & 11 \\ 4 & 12 & 25 & 12 & 17 & 26 \\ 5 & 13 & 17 & 13 & 15 & 20 \\ 6 & 11 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 15 \\ 7 & 14 & 32 & 15 & 12 & 18 \\ 8 & 16 & 21 & 16 & 10 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The professor swims Here are data on the time (in minutes) Professor Moore takes to swim 2000 yards and his pulse rate (beats per minute) after swimming on a random sample of 23 days: $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \hline \text { Time: } & 34.12 & 35.72 & 34.72 & 34.05 & 34.13 & 35.72 \\ \text { Pulse: } & 152 & 124 & 140 & 152 & 146 & 128 \\ \text { Time: } & 36.17 & 35.57 & 35.37 & 35.57 & 35.43 & 36.05 \\ \text { Pulse: } & 136 & 144 & 148 & 144 & 136 & 124 \\ \text { Time: } & 34.85 & 34.70 & 34.75 & 33.93 & 34.60 & 34.00 \\ \text { Pulse: } & 148 & 144 & 140 & 156 & 136 & 148 \\ \text { Time: } & 34.35 & 35.62 & 35.68 & 35.28 & 35.97 & \\ \text { Pulse: } & 148 & 132 & 124 & 132 & 139 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Is there statistically significant evidence of a negative linear relationship between Professor Moore's swim time and his pulse rate in the population of days on which he swims 2000 yards? Carry out an appropriate significance test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level.

Refer to the following setting. About 1100 high school teachers attended a weeklong summer institute for teaching \(\mathrm{AP}^{(\mathrm{(R)}}\) classes. After hearing about the survey in Exercise \(52,\) the teachers in the \(\mathrm{AP}^{(R)}\) Statistics class wondered whether the results of the tattoo survey would be similar for teachers. They designed a survey to find out. The class opted to take a random sample of 100 teachers at the institute. One of the questions on the survey was Do you have any tattoos on your body? (Circle one) YES \(\quad\) NO Tattoos (4.1) One of the first decisions the class had to make was what kind of sampling method to use. (a) They knew that a simple random sample was the "preferred" method. With 1100 teachers in 40 different sessions, the class decided not to use an SRS. Give at least two reasons why you think they made this decision. (b) The AP Statistics class believed that there might be systematic differences in the proportions of teachers who had tattoos based on the subject areas that they taught. What sampling method would you recommend to account for this possibility? Explain a statistical advantage of this method over an SRS.

Weeds among the corn Lamb's-quarter is a common weed that interferes with the growth of corn. An agriculture researcher planted corn at the same rate in 16 small plots of ground and then weeded the plots by hand to allow a fixed number of lamb'squarter plants to grow in each meter of corn row. The decision of how many of these plants to leave in each plot was made at random. No other weeds were allowed to grow. Here are the yields of corn (bushels per acre) in each of the plots: Some computer output from a least-squares regression analysis on these data is shown below. $$ \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 166.483 & 2.725 & 61.11 & 0.000 \\ \begin{array}{l} \text { Weeds per } \\ \text { meter } \end{array} & -1.0987 & 0.5712 & -1.92 & 0.075 \\ \mathrm{~S}=7.97665 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=20.9 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =15.3 \% \end{array} $$ (a) What is the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting corn yield from the number of lamb's quarter plants per meter? Interpret the slope and \(y\) intercept of the regression line in context. (b) Explain what the value of \(s\) means in this setting. (c) Do these data provide convincing evidence at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level that more weeds reduce corn yield? Assume that the conditions for performing inference are met.

Refer to the following setting. Yellowstone National Park surveyed a random sample of 1526 winter visitors to the park. They asked each person whether he or she owned, rented, or had never used a snowmobile. Respondents were also asked whether they belonged to an environmental organization (like the Sierra Club). The two-way table summarizes the survey responses. $$ \begin{array}{lcrr} \hline & {2}{c} {\text { Environmental Clubs }} & \\ { } & \text { No } & \text { Yes } & \text { Total } \\ \text { Never used } & 445 & 212 & 657 \\ \text { Snowmobile renter } & 497 & 77 & 574 \\ \text { Snowmobile owner } & 279 & 16 & 295 \\ \text { Total } & 1221 & 305 & 1526 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Snowmobiles (5.2,5.3) (a) If we choose a survey respondent at random, what's the probability that this individual (i) is a snowmobile owner? (ii) belongs to an environmental organization or owns a snowmobile? (iii) has never used a snowmobile given that the person belongs to an environmental organization? (b) Are the events "is a snowmobile owner" and "belongs to an environmental organization" independent for the members of the sample? Justify your answer. (c) If we choose two survey respondents at random, what's the probability that (i) both are snowmobile owners? (ii) at least one of the two belongs to an environmental organization?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.