/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Refer to the following setting. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to the following setting. Yellowstone National Park surveyed a random sample of 1526 winter visitors to the park. They asked each person whether he or she owned, rented, or had never used a snowmobile. Respondents were also asked whether they belonged to an environmental organization (like the Sierra Club). The two-way table summarizes the survey responses. $$ \begin{array}{lcrr} \hline & {2}{c} {\text { Environmental Clubs }} & \\ { } & \text { No } & \text { Yes } & \text { Total } \\ \text { Never used } & 445 & 212 & 657 \\ \text { Snowmobile renter } & 497 & 77 & 574 \\ \text { Snowmobile owner } & 279 & 16 & 295 \\ \text { Total } & 1221 & 305 & 1526 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Snowmobiles (5.2,5.3) (a) If we choose a survey respondent at random, what's the probability that this individual (i) is a snowmobile owner? (ii) belongs to an environmental organization or owns a snowmobile? (iii) has never used a snowmobile given that the person belongs to an environmental organization? (b) Are the events "is a snowmobile owner" and "belongs to an environmental organization" independent for the members of the sample? Justify your answer. (c) If we choose two survey respondents at random, what's the probability that (i) both are snowmobile owners? (ii) at least one of the two belongs to an environmental organization?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) (i) 19.33%, (ii) 38.27%, (iii) 69.51%. (b) Not independent. (c) (i) 3.72%, (ii) 36.01%.

Step by step solution

01

Probability of Snowmobile Owner

To find the probability that a survey respondent is a snowmobile owner, divide the number of snowmobile owners by the total number of respondents. The number of snowmobile owners is 295, and the total number is 1526. Therefore, the probability is \( \frac{295}{1526} \approx 0.1933 \) or 19.33%.
02

Probability of Belonging to an Environmental Organization or Owning a Snowmobile

First, find the total number of people who either belong to an environmental organization or own a snowmobile by adding individuals who belog to an organization (305 total) and snowmobile owners (295 total). Then subtract those counted twice (both snowmobile owners and in an organization, 16). So, 305 + 295 - 16 = 584. Divide 584 by the total number of respondents, 1526. Thus, the probability is \( \frac{584}{1526} \approx 0.3827 \) or 38.27%.
03

Probability of Never Used Snowmobile Given Belongs to Environmental Organization

To find this conditional probability, divide the number of people who have never used a snowmobile and belong to an environmental organization (212) by the total number of people who belong to an environmental organization (305). Therefore, the probability is \( \frac{212}{305} \approx 0.6951 \) or 69.51%.
04

Check Independence of Being a Snowmobile Owner and Belonging to an Environmental Organization

Two events, A and B, are independent if \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \times P(B) \). Here, \( P(A) \) is the probability of being a snowmobile owner \( \frac{295}{1526} \), \( P(B) \) is the probability of belonging to an environmental organization \( \frac{305}{1526} \), and \( P(A \cap B) \) is the probability of being both \( \frac{16}{1526} \). Calculate \( P(A) \times P(B) \approx 0.1933 \times 0.1999 \approx 0.0387 \) which is not equal to \( \frac{16}{1526} \approx 0.0105 \). Therefore, the events are not independent.
05

Probability Both Are Snowmobile Owners

The probability that the first respondent is a snowmobile owner is \( \frac{295}{1526} \). Assuming without replacement, the probability the second respondent is also a snowmobile owner is \( \frac{294}{1525} \). Thus, the probability both are owners is \( \frac{295}{1526} \times \frac{294}{1525} \approx 0.0372 \) or 3.72%.
06

Probability At Least One Belongs to an Environmental Organization

The probability that neither belongs to the environmental organization is the product of probabilities each does not belong: \( P(\text{not in org}) = \frac{1221}{1526} \) and for the second \( \frac{1220}{1525} \). Thus, \( \frac{1221}{1526} \times \frac{1220}{1525} \approx 0.6399 \). Therefore, the probability that at least one belongs is \( 1 - 0.6399 = 0.3601 \) or 36.01%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Probability
Conditional probability is a way to find the likelihood of an event happening, given that another event has already happened. For example, we might be interested in knowing the probability that a person has never used a snowmobile, given they belong to an environmental organization. Here, the 'given' condition is crucial. We use the formula:
  • \( P(A | B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)} \)
This formula tells us that the probability of event A happening, given that B has occurred, is equal to the probability of both A and B happening, divided by the probability of B.
In our problem, we find the number of visitors who never used a snowmobile and are part of an environmental group, then divide by those who are in such groups. This simplifies understanding situations where multiple conditions or known factors affect probabilities.
Two-Way Table
A two-way table is a useful organizing tool in probability and statistics. It shows how different variables relate to one another. Each cell in the table gives the count of individuals who share each combination of characteristics.
  • Rows often represent one variable.
  • Columns represent another variable.
For instance, our two-way table categorizes survey respondents by their snowmobile usage status and their membership in an environmental club. These tables help break down complex datasets into manageable information.
In practice, you can easily see how many people belong to each category by simply looking at the table. It's a visual approach that often makes interpreting and analyzing data much simpler. Two-way tables are especially helpful when calculating probabilities of combined events, like having one characteristic or belonging to a group.
Independence of Events
Independence of events is a key concept in probability. Two events are independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the occurrence of the other. Checking this relationship involves comparing probabilities:
  • If \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \times P(B) \), the events are independent.
Independence matters because it simplifies calculations. Suppose you have two events: being a snowmobile owner and belonging to an environmental organization. We calculated probabilities based on whether these were independent.
If they were independent, the probability of being both would equal the product of each event's individual probability. However, when they don't match, as in our example, it tells us these two characteristics interact in some significant way — they're not independent.
Random Sampling
Random sampling is a fundamental practice in statistics. It's used to gather a representative sample of a larger population. This method ensures that every individual has an equal chance of being selected, minimizing bias.
  • It leads to more accurate and generalizable results.
  • Random samples help statisticians make reliable inferences about the population as a whole.
In our scenario, survey respondents were randomly selected from winter visitors in the park. Thus, the data collected is likely to be unbiased and representative of the views of all park visitors in winter.
Random sampling helps ensure that the conclusions drawn from probability calculations like those in our exercise are valid. It forms a critical foundation for any statistical analysis, underpinning both its usefulness and reliability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Paired tires Exercise 71 in Chapter 8 (page 529 ) compared two methods for estimating tire wear. The first method used the amount of weight lost by a tire. The second method used the amount of wear in the grooves of the tire. A random sample of 16 tires was obtained. Both methods were used to estimate the total distance traveled by each tire. The following scatterplot displays the two estimates (in thousands of miles) for each tire. \({ }^{12}\) Computer output from a least-squares regression analysis of these data is shown below. Assume that the conditions for regression inference are met. $$ \begin{array}{lllrl} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 1.351 & 2.105 & 0.64 & 0.531 \\ \text { Weight } & 0.79021 & 0.07104 & 11.12 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~S}=2.62078 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=89.8 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =89.1 \% \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that the \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the slope of the population regression line is (0.5787,1.0017) (b) Researchers want to test whether there is a difference in the two methods of estimating tire wear. Explain why the researchers might think that an appropriate pair of hypotheses for this test is \(H_{0}: \beta=1\) versus \(H_{a}: \beta \neq 1\) (c) Compute the test statistic and \(P\) -value for the test in part (b). What conclusion would you draw at the \(\alpha=0.01\) significance level? (d) Does the confidence interval in part (a) lead to the same conclusion as the test in part (c)? Explain.

Boyle's law If you have taken a chemistry or physics class, then you are probably familiar with Boyle's law: for gas in a confined space kept at a constant temperature, pressure times volume is a constant (in symbols, \(P V=k\) ). Students collected the following data on pressure and volume using a syringe and a pressure probe. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \hline \text { Volume (cubic centimeters) } & \text { Pressure (atmospheres) } \\\ 6 & 2.9589 \\ 8 & 2.4073 \\ 10 & 1.9905 \\ 12 & 1.7249 \\ 14 & 1.5288 \\ 16 & 1.3490 \\ 18 & 1.2223 \\ 20 & 1.1201 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a reasonably accurate scatterplot of the data by hand using volume as the explanatory variable. Describe what you see. (b) If the true relationship between the pressure and volume of the gas is \(P V=k\), we can divide both sides of this equation by \(V\) to obtain the theoretical model \(P=k / V,\) or \(P=k(1 / V) .\) Use the graph below to identify the transformation that was used to linearize the curved pattern in part (a). (c) Use the graph below to identify the transformation that was used to linearize the curved pattern in part (a).

Light through the water Some college students collected data on the intensity of light at various depths in a lake. Here are their data: \begin{tabular}{cc} \hline Depth (m) & Light intensity (lumens) \\ 5 & 168.00 \\ 6 & 120.42 \\ 7 & 86.31 \\ 8 & 61.87 \\ 9 & 44.34 \\ 10 & 31.78 \\ 11 & 22.78 \\ \hline \end{tabular} (a) Make a reasonably accurate scatterplot of the data by hand, using depth as the explanatory variable. Describe what you see. (b) A scatterplot of the natural logarithm of light intensity versus depth is shown below. Based on this graph, explain why it would be reasonable to use an exponential model to describe the relationship between light intensity and depth. (c) Minitab output from a linear regression analysis on the transformed data is shown below. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 6.78910 & 0.00009 & 78575.46 & 0.000 \\ \text { Depth }(\mathrm{m}) & -0.333021 & 0.000010 & -31783.44 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~S}=0.000055 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=100.0 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj})=100.0 \% \end{array} $$ Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use. (d) Use your model to predict the light intensity at a depth of 12 meters. Show your work.

Determining tree biomass It is easy to measure the "diameter at breast height" of a tree. It's hard to measure the total "aboveground biomass" of a tree, because to do this you must cut and weigh the tree. The biomass is important for studies of ecology, so ecologists commonly estimate it using a power model. Combining data on 378 trees in tropical rain forests gives this relationship between biomass \(y\) measured in kilograms and diameter \(x\) measured in centimeters: \(^{20}\) $$ \widehat{\ln y}=-2.00+2.42 \ln x $$ Use this model to estimate the biomass of a tropical tree 30 centimeters in diameter. Show your work.

Ideal proportions The students in Mr. Shenk's class measured the arm spans and heights (in inches) of a random sample of 18 students from their large high school. Some computer output from a least-squares regression analysis on these data is shown below. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the slope of the population regression line. Assume that the conditions for performing inference are met. \(\begin{array}{lllrl}\text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { Stdev } & \text { t-ratio } & \text { p } \\ \text { Constant } & 11.547 & 5.600 & 2.06 & 0.056 \\ \text { Armspan } & 0.84042 & 0.08091 & 10.39 & 0.000 \\\ \mathrm{~S}=1.613 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=87.1 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =86.3 \%\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.