/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 The researchers report that the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The researchers report that the results were statistically significant at the \(1 \%\) level. Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion? (a) Because the \(P\) -value is less than \(1 \%\), fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the proportion of male college students in the study who worked for pay last summer is different from the proportion of female college students in the study who worked for pay last summer. (b) Because the \(P\) -value is less than \(1 \%\), fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the proportion of all male college students who worked for pay last summer is different from the proportion of all female college students who worked for pay last summer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both statements are incorrect, the null hypothesis should be rejected.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Statistical Significance

Statistical significance at the 1% level (or a P-value < 0.01) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, allowing us to reject it. Failure to reject the null hypothesis is not appropriate when the P-value is this small.
02

Analyzing Option (a)

Option (a) suggests failing to reject the null hypothesis due to a P-value less than 1%, but this contradicts the rule of rejecting the null hypothesis when the P-value is significantly small.
03

Analyzing Option (b)

Similar to option(a), option (b) also suggests failing to reject the null hypothesis when the P-value is less than 1%, which is incorrect given our understanding of statistical significance.
04

Correct Conclusion

Since the P-value is less than 1%, we would reject the null hypothesis. Neither option (a) nor option (b) presents the correct conclusion based on the given P-value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a fundamental concept in statistics. It represents a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena. In the context of research, when we talk about comparing groups - such as male and female college students in the original exercise - the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the groups. This means that any observed differences are due to chance.

For example, if researchers want to examine whether the proportion of male college students who worked for pay is different from female students, the null hypothesis would state: "There is no difference in the proportion of male and female college students who worked for pay last summer."

In hypothesis testing, our main goal is to find evidence that can allow us to confidently reject the null hypothesis, suggesting instead that there is a significant difference or effect.
Decoding the P-value
The P-value is a crucial tool in hypothesis testing that helps researchers determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. When a study reports a P-value, it is essentially telling us the probability of observing the study's results, or results more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

If we have a very small P-value, it means that such extreme results would be very rare if the null hypothesis were true. Conventionally, a P-value less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. However, some studies use a more stringent threshold, such as 0.01, to provide stronger evidence. In the exercise provided, the reported P-value is less than 1%, which indicates a very strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

This means that the results are statistically significant at the 1% level, suggesting that the likelihood of the observed data given that \(H_0\) is true is extremely low.
  • A lower P-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • A higher P-value indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis.
Rejecting the Null Hypothesis
Rejecting the null hypothesis is an essential part of statistical hypothesis testing. When we say we "reject \(H_0\)," we are concluding that the data provides enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis, which claims that there is a significant effect or difference.

The decision to reject \(H_0\) depends largely on the P-value and the chosen significance level (commonly \(\alpha = 0.05\) or \(\alpha = 0.01\)). For instance, if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, it is standard practice to reject the null hypothesis.

In the context of the exercise, both conclusion options (a) and (b) incorrectly suggest failing to reject the null hypothesis despite a P-value less than 1%. The correct interpretation, given a P-value this low, would be to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a meaningful difference between the male and female college students' employment status last summer.

Rejecting \(H_0\) suggests:
  • There is evidence to support that a genuine effect exists.
  • The difference observed in the sample is not likely due to random chance alone.
Remember, while rejection implies a significant finding, it doesn't always translate to practical significance or causation without further contextual understanding.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Listening to rap Is rap music more popular among young blacks than among young whites? A sample survey compared 634 randomly chosen blacks aged 15 to 25 with 567 randomly selected whites in the same age group. It found that 368 of the blacks and 130 of the whites listened to rap music every day. (a) Calculate the standard error of the sampling distribution of the difference in the sample proportions (blacks - whites). What information does this value provide? (b) Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of black and white young people who listen to rap every day.

Exercises 58 to 60 refer to the following setting. A study of road rage asked random samples of \(596 \mathrm{men}\) and 523 women about their behavior while driving. Based on their answers, each person was assigned a road rage score on a scale of 0 to \(20 .\) The participants were chosen by random digit dialing of phone numbers. The researchers performed a test of the following hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu_{M}=\mu_{F}\) versus \(H_{a^{*}} \mu_{M} \neq \mu_{F}\) The \(P\) -value for the stated hypotheses is 0.002 . Interpret this value in the context of this study. (a) Assuming that the true mean road rage score is the same for males and females, there is a 0.002 probability of getting a difference in sample means. (b) Assuming that the true mean road rage score is the same for males and females, there is a 0.002 probability of getting an observed difference at least as extreme as the observed difference. (c) Assuming that the true mean road rage score is different for males and females, there is a 0.002 probability of getting an observed difference at least as extreme as the observed difference. (d) Assuming that the true mean road rage score is the same for males and females, there is a 0.002 probability that the null hypothesis is true. (e) Assuming that the true mean road rage score is the same for males and females, there is a 0.002 probability that the alternative hypothesis is true.

A better drug? In a pilot study, a company's new cholesterol-reducing drug outperforms the currently available drug. If the data provide convincing evidence that the mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than 10 milligrams per deciliter of blood \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dl})\) greater than with the current drug, the company will begin the expensive process of mass- producing the new drug. For the 14 subjects who were assigned at random to the current drug. the mean cholesterol reduction was \(54.1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dl}\) with a standard deviation of \(11.93 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dl}\). For the \(15 \mathrm{sub}\) jects who were randomly assigned to the new drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was \(68.7 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dl}\) with a standard deviation of \(13.3 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dl}\). Graphs of the data reveal no outliers or strong skewness. (a) Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is not \(\left.H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0 .\right)\) (b) Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Prayer and pregnancy Two hundred women who were about to undergo IVF served as subjects in an experiment. Each subject was randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group. Women in the treatment group were intentionally prayed for by several people (called intercessors) who did not know them, a process known as intercessory prayer. The praying continued for three weeks following IVF. The intercessors did not pray for the women in the control group. Here are the results: 44 of the 88 women in the treatment group got pregnant, compared to 21 out of 81 in the control group. \({ }^{17}\) Is the pregnancy rate significantly higher for women who received intercessory prayer? To find out, researchers perform a test of \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) versus \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2},\) where \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) are the actual pregnancy rates for women like those in the study who do and don't receive intercessory prayer, respectively. (a) Name the appropriate test and check that the conditions for carrying out this test are met. (b) The appropriate test from part (a) yields a \(P\) -value of 0.0007 . Interpret this \(P\) -value in context. (c) What conclusion should researchers draw at the \(\alpha=\) 0.05 significance level? Explain. (d) The women in the study did not know whether they were being prayed for. Explain why this is important.

Children make choices Many new products introduced into the market are targeted toward children. The choice behavior of children with regard to new products is of particular interest to companies that design marketing strategies for these products. As part of one study, randomly selected children in different age groups were compared on their ability to sort new products into the correct product category (milk or juice). \({ }^{14}\) Here are some of the data: $$ \begin{array}{lll} \hline \text { Age group } & N & \text { Number who sorted correctly } \\ \text { 4- to 5-year-olds } & 50 & 10 \\ \text { 6- to 7-year-olds } & 53 & 28 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Did a significantly higher proportion of the 6 - to 7-year-olds than the 4 - to 5 -year-olds sort correctly? Give appropriate evidence to justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.