/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 The researchers report that the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The researchers report that the results were statistically significant at the \(1 \%\) level. Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion? (a) Because the \(P\) -value is less than \(1 \%\), fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the proportion of male college students in the study who worked for pay last summer is different from the proportion of female college students in the study who worked for pay last summer. (b) Because the \(P\) -value is less than \(1 \%\), fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the proportion of all male college students who worked for pay last summer is different from the proportion of all female college students who worked for pay last summer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both statements are incorrect, the null hypothesis should be rejected.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Statistical Significance

Statistical significance at the 1% level (or a P-value < 0.01) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, allowing us to reject it. Failure to reject the null hypothesis is not appropriate when the P-value is this small.
02

Analyzing Option (a)

Option (a) suggests failing to reject the null hypothesis due to a P-value less than 1%, but this contradicts the rule of rejecting the null hypothesis when the P-value is significantly small.
03

Analyzing Option (b)

Similar to option(a), option (b) also suggests failing to reject the null hypothesis when the P-value is less than 1%, which is incorrect given our understanding of statistical significance.
04

Correct Conclusion

Since the P-value is less than 1%, we would reject the null hypothesis. Neither option (a) nor option (b) presents the correct conclusion based on the given P-value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a fundamental concept in statistics. It represents a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena. In the context of research, when we talk about comparing groups - such as male and female college students in the original exercise - the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the groups. This means that any observed differences are due to chance.

For example, if researchers want to examine whether the proportion of male college students who worked for pay is different from female students, the null hypothesis would state: "There is no difference in the proportion of male and female college students who worked for pay last summer."

In hypothesis testing, our main goal is to find evidence that can allow us to confidently reject the null hypothesis, suggesting instead that there is a significant difference or effect.
Decoding the P-value
The P-value is a crucial tool in hypothesis testing that helps researchers determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. When a study reports a P-value, it is essentially telling us the probability of observing the study's results, or results more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

If we have a very small P-value, it means that such extreme results would be very rare if the null hypothesis were true. Conventionally, a P-value less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. However, some studies use a more stringent threshold, such as 0.01, to provide stronger evidence. In the exercise provided, the reported P-value is less than 1%, which indicates a very strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

This means that the results are statistically significant at the 1% level, suggesting that the likelihood of the observed data given that \(H_0\) is true is extremely low.
  • A lower P-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • A higher P-value indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis.
Rejecting the Null Hypothesis
Rejecting the null hypothesis is an essential part of statistical hypothesis testing. When we say we "reject \(H_0\)," we are concluding that the data provides enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis, which claims that there is a significant effect or difference.

The decision to reject \(H_0\) depends largely on the P-value and the chosen significance level (commonly \(\alpha = 0.05\) or \(\alpha = 0.01\)). For instance, if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, it is standard practice to reject the null hypothesis.

In the context of the exercise, both conclusion options (a) and (b) incorrectly suggest failing to reject the null hypothesis despite a P-value less than 1%. The correct interpretation, given a P-value this low, would be to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a meaningful difference between the male and female college students' employment status last summer.

Rejecting \(H_0\) suggests:
  • There is evidence to support that a genuine effect exists.
  • The difference observed in the sample is not likely due to random chance alone.
Remember, while rejection implies a significant finding, it doesn't always translate to practical significance or causation without further contextual understanding.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Listening to rap Is rap music more popular among young blacks than among young whites? A sample survey compared 634 randomly chosen blacks aged 15 to 25 with 567 randomly selected whites in the same age group. It found that 368 of the blacks and 130 of the whites listened to rap music every day. (a) Calculate the standard error of the sampling distribution of the difference in the sample proportions (blacks - whites). What information does this value provide? (b) Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of black and white young people who listen to rap every day.

Who talks more-men or women? Researchers equipped random samples of 56 male and 56 female students from a large university with a small device that secretly records sound for a random 30 seconds during each 12.5 -minute period over two days. Then they counted the number of words spoken by each subject during each recording period and, from this, estimated how many words per day each subject speaks. The female estimates had a mean of 16,177 words per day with a standard deviation of 7520 words per day. For the male estimates, the mean was 16,569 and the standard deviation was \(9108 .\) Do these data provide convincing evidence of a difference in the average number of words spoken in a day by male and female students at this university?

Young adults living at home A surprising number of young adults (ages 19 to 25 ) still live in their parents' homes. A random sample by the National Institutes of Health included 2253 men and 2629 women in this age group. \({ }^{11}\) The survey found that 986 of the men and 923 of the women lived with their parents. (a) Construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the true proportions of men and women aged 19 to 25 who live in their parents' homes. (b) Does your interval from part (a) give convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions? Explain.

Broken crackers We don't like to find broken crackers when we open the package. How can makers reduce breaking? One idea is to microwave the crackers for 30 seconds right after baking them. Breaks start as hairline cracks called "checking." Randomly assign 65 newly baked crackers to the microwave and another 65 to a control group that is not microwaved. After one day, none of the microwave group and 16 of the control group show checking.

Which of the following is the correct margin of error for a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of male and female college students who worked for pay last summer? (a) \(2.576 \sqrt{\frac{0.851(0.149)}{550}+\frac{0.851(0.149)}{500}}\) (b) \(2.576 \sqrt{\frac{0.851(0.149)}{1050}}\) (c) \(2.576 \sqrt{\frac{0.880(0.120)}{550}+\frac{0.820(0.180)}{500}}\) (d) \(1.960 \sqrt{\frac{0.851(0.149)}{550}+\frac{0.851(0.149)}{500}}\) (e) \(1.960 \sqrt{\frac{0.880(0.120)}{550}+\frac{0.820(0.180)}{500}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.