/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.9 An SRS of 100 postal employees f... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An SRS of 100 postal employees found that the average time these employees had worked at the postal service was 7years with standard deviation 2years. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean time of employment M for the population of postal employees has changed from the value of 7.5 that was true 20years ago? To determine this, we test the hypotheses H0:μ=7.5versus Ha:μ≠7.5using a one-sample ttest. What conclusion should we draw at the 5%significance level?

(a) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service has changed.

(b) There is not convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service has changed.

(c) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service is still 7.5 years.

(d) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service is now 7years.

(e) We cannot draw a conclusion at the 5% significance level. The sample size is too small.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The answer is (a). There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service has changed.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

H0:μ=7.5

Ha:μ≠7.5

x¯=7

s=2

n=100

02

Explanation

Determine the value of the test statistic:

t=x¯-μ0s/n

=7-7.52/100

=-2.50

The P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's result, or a number that is more severe. The P-value is the number (or interval) in Table IV's column title that corresponds to the row's t-value.

localid="1650366176477" n-1=100-1

=99>80:

localid="1650366216288" 0.01=2×0.005<P<2×0.01

=0.02

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than the significance level.

P<0.05=5%⇒RejectH0

There is convincing evidence that the meantime working with the postal service has changed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A local high school makes a change that should improve student satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, 37% of the school’s students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200 of the over 2500 students at the school. In all, 83 students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective. Perform a test of the principal’s claim at the α=0.05 significance level.

The reason we use tprocedures instead of zprocedures when carrying out a test about a population mean is that

(a) zcan be used only for large samples.

(b)zrequires that you know the population standard deviation σ.

(c) zrequires you to regard your data as an SRS from the population.

(d) zapplies only if the population distribution is perfectly Normal.

(e) zcan be used only for confidence intervals.

After once again losing a football game to the archrival, a college’s alumni association conducted a survey to see if alumni were in favor of firing the

coach. An SRS of 100 alumni from the population of all living alumni was taken, and 64 of the alumni in the sample were in favor of firing the coach.

Suppose you wish to see if a majority of living alumni are in favor of firing the coach. The appropriate test statistic is

a. z=0.64-0.50.64(0.36)100

b.t=0.64-0.50.64(0.36)100

c.z=0.64-0.50.5(0.5)100

d.z=0.64-0.50.64(0.36)64

e.z=0.5-0.640.5(0.5)100

Explain in plain language why a significance test that is significant at the 1% level must always be significant at the 5% level. If a test is significant at the 5% level, what can you say about its significance at the 1% level?

To determine the reliability of experts who interpret lie detector tests in criminal investigations, a random sample of 280such cases was studied. The results were

(a) 15/280.

(b) 9/280.

(c) 15/140.

(d) 9/140.

(e) 15/146.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.