/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.17 Explain in plain language why a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain in plain language why a significance test that is significant at the 1% level must always be significant at the 5% level. If a test is significant at the 5% level, what can you say about its significance at the 1% level?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is not known the significance at1%level.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

the significance level is an outcome that has measurable importance when having happened given the invalid hypothesis is far-fetched

02

explanation

Given,

significance levels are 1%and 5%which is 0.01and 0.05

When the significant level is 0.05,

The null hypothesis is true as the probability of getting the sample value is less than0.05

The probability is either greater or less than 0.01

Hence It is not known the significance at 1%level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Radon detectors Radon is a colorless, odorless gas that is naturally released by rocks and soils and may concentrate in tightly closed houses. Because radon is slightly radioactive, there is some concern that it may be a health hazard. Radon detectors are sold to homeowners worried about this risk, but the detectors may be inaccurate. University researchers placed a random sample of 11detectors in a chamber where they were exposed to 105picocuries per liter of radon over 3days. A graph of the radon readings from the 11detectors shows no strong skewness or outliers. The Minitab output below shows the results of a one-sample t interval. Is there significant evidence at the 10%level that the mean reading μdiffers from the true value 105? Give appropriate evidence to support your answer.

Strong chairs? A company that manufactures classroom chairs for high school students claims that the mean breaking strength of the chairs that they make is 300pounds. One of the chairs collapsed beneath a 220-pound student last week. You wonder whether the manufacturer is exaggerating the breaking strength of the chairs.

(a) State null and alternative hypotheses in words and symbols.

(b) Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this situation, and give the consequences of each.

(c) Would you recommend a significance level of0.01,0.05, or 0.10for this test? Justify your choice.

(d) The power of this test to detect μ=294is 0.71. Explain what this means to someone who knows little statistics.

(e) Explain two ways that you could increase the power of the test from (d).

- If conditions are met, conduct a significance test about a population proportion.

Haemoglobin is a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to body tissues. People with less than 12 grams of haemoglobin per deciliter of blood (g/dl) are anaemic. A public health official in Jordan suspects that Jordanian children are at risk of anaemia. He measures a random sample of 50 children.

A 95%confidence interval for a population mean is calculated to be (1.7,3.5). Assume that the conditions for performing inference are met. What conclusion can we draw for a test of role="math" localid="1650275427722" H0:μ=2versus Ha:μ≠2at the A=0.05level based on the confidence interval?

(a) None. We cannot carry out the test without the original data.

(b) None. We cannot draw a conclusion at the A=0.05level since this test is connected to the 97.5%confidence interval.

(c) None. Confidence intervals and significance tests are unrelated procedures.

(d) We would reject H0at level A=0.05.

(e) We would fail to reject H0at level A=0.05.

A researcher claims to have found a drug that causes people to grow taller. The coach of the basketball team at Brandon University has expressed interest but demands evidence. Over 1000 Brandon students volunteer to participate in an experiment to test this new drug. Fifty of the volunteers are randomly selected, their heights are measured, and they are given the drug. Two weeks later, their heights are measured again. The power of the test to detect an average increase in height of one inch could be increased by

(a) using only volunteers from the basketball team in the experiment.

(b) using A=0.01 instead of A=0.05.

(c) using A=0.05 instead of A=0.01.

(d) giving the drug to 25 randomly selected students instead of 50.

(e) using a two-sided test instead of a one-sided test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.