/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.17 Explain in plain language why a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain in plain language why a significance test that is significant at the 1% level must always be significant at the 5% level. If a test is significant at the 5% level, what can you say about its significance at the 1% level?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is not known the significance at1%level.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

the significance level is an outcome that has measurable importance when having happened given the invalid hypothesis is far-fetched

02

explanation

Given,

significance levels are 1%and 5%which is 0.01and 0.05

When the significant level is 0.05,

The null hypothesis is true as the probability of getting the sample value is less than0.05

The probability is either greater or less than 0.01

Hence It is not known the significance at 1%level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Improving health A large company's medical director launches a health promotion campaign to encourage employees to exercise more and eat better foods. One measure of the effectiveness of such a program is a drop in blood pressure. The director chooses a random sample of 50employees and compares their blood pressures from physical cams given before the campaign and again a year later. The mean change (after - before) in systolic blood pressure for these 50employees is -6and the standard deviation is 19.8.

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence of an average decrease in blood pressure among all of the company's employees during this year? Carry out a test at the α=0.05significance level.

(b) Can we conclude that the health campaign caused a decrease in blood pressure? Why or why not?

Describe a Type I error in this setting.

A change is made that should improve student satisfaction with the parking situation at your school. Right now, 37% of students approve of the parking that’s provided. The null hypothesis H0:p^=0.37is tested against the alternativeHd:p^≠0.37.

Anemia For the study of Jordanian children in Exercise 64, the sample mean hemoglobin level was 11.3mg/dl and the sample standard deviation was 1.6mg/dl.

(a) Calculate the test statistic.

(b) Find the P-value using Table B. Then obtain a

more precise P-value from your calculator.

Flu vaccine A drug company has developed a new vaccine for preventing the flu. The company claims that fewer than 5%of adults who use its vaccine will get the flu. To test the claim, researchers give the vaccine to a random sample of 1000adults. Of these, 43get the flu.

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence to support the company's claim? Perform an appropriate test to support your answer.

(b) Which kind of mistake - a Type I error or a Type II error-could you have made in (a)? Explain.

(c) From the company's point of view, would a Type I error or Type Il error be more serious? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.