/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.4  Flu vaccine A drug company has... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Flu vaccine A drug company has developed a new vaccine for preventing the flu. The company claims that fewer than 5%of adults who use its vaccine will get the flu. To test the claim, researchers give the vaccine to a random sample of 1000adults. Of these, 43get the flu.

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence to support the company's claim? Perform an appropriate test to support your answer.

(b) Which kind of mistake - a Type I error or a Type II error-could you have made in (a)? Explain.

(c) From the company's point of view, would a Type I error or Type Il error be more serious? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) No

(b) Type ll error

(c)Type l error

Step by step solution

01

 Part (a) Step1 :Given Information

Given in the question that,

Number of trialsn=1000

Number of successx=43

Population proportion(p)=0.05we have to ensure these data provide convincing evidence to support the company's claim.

02

Part (a) Step2: Explanation 

The formula to complete the test statistic is:

z=p^-p0p01-p0n

using the information the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H0:P=0.05

HO:P0<0.05

Using the Ti-83 calculator the output is:

The p-value is higher than the level of significance. As a result, the non-rejection of the null hypothesis is represented as decision.

There is adequate evidence to support the stated assertion at the 5%significance level.

03

Part(b) Step 1: Given Information

Given in the question that Flu vaccine A drug company has developed a new vaccine for preventing the flu. The company claims that fewer than 5%of adults who use its vaccine will get the flu. To test the claim, researchers give the vaccine to a random sample of 1000adults. Of these, 43get the flu. we have to find Which kind of mistake - a Type I error or a Type II error-could you have made in (a).

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation 

From above part, the null hypothesis has not been rejected. Thus, there is a possibility of committing the Type ll error.

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

Given in the question that Flu vaccine A drug company has developed a new vaccine for preventing the flu. The company claims that fewer than 5%of adults who use its vaccine will get the flu. To test the claim, researchers give the vaccine to a random sample of 1000adults. Of these, 43 get the flu. we have to find From the company's point of view, would a Type I error or Type Il error be more serious .

06

Part (c) Step2: Explanation 

It's likely that more people are acquiring flu as a result of the Type I error than the test indicated. As a result, type I errors are more serious.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Study more! A student group claims that first-year students at a university study 2.5hours per night during the school week. A skeptic suspects that they study less than that on average. He takes a random sample of 30first-year students and finds that x=137minutes and sx=45minutes. A graph of the data shows no outliers but some skewness. Carry out an appropriate significance test at the 5%significance level. What conclusion do you draw?

You are testing HO:μ=10Hα:μ<10against based on an SRS of 20observations from a Normal population. The tstatistic is . t=-2.25The P-value

(a) falls between 0.01and0.02

(b) falls between0.02and0.04

(c) falls between0.04and0.05

(d) falls between .05and0.25.

(c) is greater than0.25.

A 95%confidence interval for a population mean is calculated to be (1.7,3.5). Assume that the conditions for performing inference are met. What conclusion can we draw for a test of role="math" localid="1650275427722" H0:μ=2versus Ha:μ≠2at the A=0.05level based on the confidence interval?

(a) None. We cannot carry out the test without the original data.

(b) None. We cannot draw a conclusion at the A=0.05level since this test is connected to the 97.5%confidence interval.

(c) None. Confidence intervals and significance tests are unrelated procedures.

(d) We would reject H0at level A=0.05.

(e) We would fail to reject H0at level A=0.05.

A blogger claims that U.S. adults drink an average of five 8-ounce glasses of water per day. Skeptical researchers ask a random sample of 24 U.S. adults about their daily water intake. A graph of the data shows a roughly symmetric shape with no outliers. The figure below displays Minitab output for a one-sample t interval for the population mean. Is there convincing evidence at the 10%significance level that the blogger’s claim is incorrect? Use the confidence interval to justify your answer.

Describe a Type I error in this setting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.