/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 5 Suppose a name-brand drug has be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose a name-brand drug has been deemed effective for reducing hypertension (high blood pressure). The developing company gets to keep a patent on the drug for a specific period of time before other companies can develop a generic form of the drug. Suppose the patent period is about to expire, and another company produces a generic version of this drug. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wants to know whether the generic drug is at least as effective as the name-brand drug in reducing blood pressure.

The following hypotheses will be used:

H0:μg=μnvs Ha:μg<μn

where

μg=true mean reduction in blood pressure using the generic drug

μn=true mean reduction in blood pressure using the name-brand drug. In the context of this situation, which of the following describes a Type I error?

(a) The FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does not reduce blood pressure as much as the namebrand drug when, in fact, it does not.

(b) The FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does not reduce blood pressure as much as the namebrand drug when, in fact, it does.

(c) The FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does reduce blood pressure as much as the namebrand drug when, in fact, it does not.

(d) The FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does reduce blood pressure as much as the namebrand drug when, in fact, it does.

(e) The FDA does not find sufficient evidence that the generic drug is as effective in reducing blood pressure as the name-brand drug when, in fact, it is.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(c) The FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does reduce blood pressure as much as the name-brand drug when,in fact , it does not.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We are given that a name-brand drug has been deemed effective for reducing hypertension. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wants to know whether the generic drug is at least as effective as the name-brand drug in reducing blood pressure. The hypothesis used is : H0:μg=μn vs Ha:μg<μn

02

Simplify

As we know, when we did not accept the null hypothesis,we are already concluding that name-brand drug has low of a reduction than generic drug.

Where as Type I rejects the null drug hypothesis stating it as not true, when in fact it is true.

Therefore, the FDA finds sufficient evidence that the generic drug does reduce blood pressure as much as the name-brand drug when,in fact , it does not.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Ideal proportions The students in Mr. Shenk's class measured the arm spans and heights (in inches) of a random sample of 18 students from their large high school. Some computer output from a least-squares regression analysis on these data is shown below. Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the slope of the population regression line. Assume that the conditions for performing inference are met.

Is wine good for your heart? A researcher from the University of California, San Diego, collected data on average per capita wine consumption and heart disease death rate in a random sample of 19 countries for which data were available. The following table displays the data.

(a) Is there statistically significant evidence of a negative linear relationship between wine consumption and heart disease deaths in the population of countries? Carry out an appropriate significance test at the α=0.05level.

(b) Calculate and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the slope β of the population regression line.

Which of the following would provide evidence that a power law model of the form y=axbwhere b≠0andb≠1, describes the relationship between a response variable yand an explanatory variable x.

(a) A scatterplot of yversus xlooks approximately linear.

(b) A scatterplot of ln yversus xlooks approximately linear.

(c) A scatterplot of yversus ln xlooks approximately linear.

(d) A scatterplot of ln yversus ln xlooks approximately linear.

(e) None of these.

Color words (4.2)Let’s review the design of the study.

(a) Explain why this was an experiment and not an observational study.

(b) Did Mr. Starnes use a completely randomized design or a randomized block design? Why do you think he chose this experimental design?

(c) Explain the purpose of the random assignment in the context of the study. The data from Mr. Starnes’s experiment are shown below. For each subject, the time to perform the two tasks is given to the nearest second.

The swinging pendulum Refer to Exercise 33. Here is Minitab output from separate regression analyses of the two sets of transformed pendulum data:

Do each of the following for both transformations.

(a) Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use.

(b) Use the model from part (a) to predict the period of a pendulum with length of 80 centimeters. Show your work.

(c) Interpret the value of s in context

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.