/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 66 Down the toilet A company that m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Down the toilet A company that makes hotel toilets claims that its new pressure-assisted toilet reduces the average amount of water used by more than 0.5a gallon per flush when compared to its current model. To test this claim, the company randomly selects 30toilets of each type and measures the amount of water that is used when each toilet is flushed once. For the current-model toilets, the mean amount of water used is1.64a gal with a standard deviation of 0.29gal. For the new toilets, the mean amount of water used is 1.09galwith a standard deviation of 0.18gal.

(a) Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is notH0:1-2=0-

(b) Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type Il error? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)Yes, the data set is providing sufficient evidence.

b) Type ll error.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

x1=1.64,x2=1.09

s1=0.29,s2=0.18

n1=30,n2=30

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

Test statistic formula is:

t=x1-x2x17n1+x22n2

The null and alternative hypotheses for the provided case are:

H0:1-2=0.5

H1:1-2>0.5

The test statistic is computed as:

t=x1-x2-1-2s12n1+s22n2

=1.64-1.09-(0.5)0.29230+0.18230

=0.802

The degree of freedom is calculated as:

df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(30-1,30-1)=29

The p-value:

P-value=0.828

In this case, P-value=0.828>0.05

The null hypothesis could not be rejected which is not showing sufficient evidence for the claim at a significant level of 5\%.

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

To determine the error that is committed using the result of the above part.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation 

From the above part, the null hypothesis has not been rejected. Thus, there is a possibility of committing the Type II error.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why the conditions for using two-sample z procedures to perform inference about p1-p2are not met in the settings

In-line skatersA study of injuries to in-line skaters used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, which collects data from a random sample of hospital emergency rooms. The researchers interviewed 161 people who came to emergency rooms with injuries from in-line skating. Wrist injuries (mostly fractures) were the most common.6The interviews found that 53people were wearing wrist guards and 6of these had wrist injuries. Of the 108who did not wear wrist guards, 45had wrist injuries.

An investor is comparing two stocks, A and B. She wants to know if over the long run, there is a significant difference in the return on investment as measured by the percent increase or decrease in the price of the stock from its date of purchase. The investor takes a random sample of 50 daily returns over the past five years for each stock. The data are summarized below.

(a) Is there a significant difference in the mean return on investment for the two stocks? Support your answer with appropriate statistical evidence. Use a 5% significance level.

(b) The investor believes that although the return on investment for Stock A usually exceeds that of Stock B, Stock A represents a riskier investment, where the risk is measured by the price volatility of the stock. The standard deviation is a statistical measure of the price volatility and indicates how much an investment鈥檚 actual performance during a specified period varies from its average performance over a longer period. Do the price fluctuations in Stock A significantly exceed those of Stock B, as measured by their standard deviations? Identify an appropriate set of hypotheses that the investor is interested in testing.

(c) To measure this, we will construct a test statistic defined F=LargersamplevarienceSmallersamplevarience

What value(s) of the statistic would indicate that the price fluctuations in Stock A significantly exceed those of Stock B? Explain.

(d) Calculate the value of the F statistic using the information given in the table.

(e) Two hundred simulated values of this test statistic, F, were calculated assuming no difference in the standard deviations of the returns for the two stocks. The results of the simulation are displayed in the following dot plot.

Use these simulated values and the test statistic that you calculated in part (d) to determine whether the observed data provide evidence that Stock A is a riskier investment than Stock B. Explain your reasoning .

Computer gaming Do experienced computer game players earn higher scores when they play with someone present to cheer them on or when they play alone? Fifty teenagers who are experienced at playing a particular computer game have volunteered for a study . We randomly assign 25of them to play the game alone and the other 25to play the game with a supporter present. Each player鈥檚 score is recorded.

(a) Is this a problem with comparing means or comparing proportions? Explain.

(b) What type of study design is being used to produce data?

Seat belt use: The proportion of drivers who use seat belts depends on things like age (young people are more likely to go unbelted) and gender (women are more likely to use belts). It also depends on local law. In New York City, police can stop a driver who is not belted. In Boston at the time of the study, police could cite a driver for not wearing a seat belt only if the driver had been stopped for some other violation. Here are data from observing random samples of female Hispanic drivers in these two cities:

(a) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why?

(b) Construct and interpret a 95%confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of female Hispanic drivers in the two cities who wear seat belts.

(c) Based on the laws in the two cities, we would expect a smaller proportion of drivers to wear seat belts in Boston than in New York. Does the confidence interval in part (b) give good evidence that this is true for female Hispanic drivers? Justify your answer.

A sample survey interviews SRSs of 500female college students and 550male college students. Each student is asked whether he or she worked for pay last summer. In all, 410 of the women and 484 of the men say 鈥淵es.鈥 The pooled sample proportion who worked last summer is about

(a) pC=1.70

(b)p^C=0.89

(c) p^C=0.88

(d) p^C=0.85

(e) p^C=0.82

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.