/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 13 A surprising number of young adu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A surprising number of young adults (ages 19to 25) still live in their parents’ homes. A random sample by the National Institutes of Health included 2253men and 2629women in this age group. The survey found that 986of the men and 923of the women lived with their parents.

(a) Construct and interpret a 99%confidence interval for the difference in population proportions (men minus women).

(b) Does your interval from part (a) give convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) We are 99%confident that the proportion of men aged 19to 25who live in their parents' homes is between 0.051and 0.123higher than the proportion of women aged 19to 25who live in their parents' homes.

(b) Yes, the interval from part (a) gives convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions.

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1: Given Information

Given

n1=Sample size =2253

x1=Number of successes =986

n2=Sample size =2629

x2=Number of successes =923

c=Confidence level=99%=0.99

02

Part(a) Step 2: Explanation

Conditions

Random, Independent 10%condition , and Normal are the three conditions for computing a hypothesis test for the population proportion p. (large counts). Because the samples are separate random samples, I'm satisfied.

Independent: Satisfied because the 2253U.S. men and the 2629U.S. women account for less than 10%of the total population of the United States. Normal: Happy because the first sample has 983 successes and 2253-983=1270failures, while the second sample has 923successes and 2629-923=1706failures, all of which are at least 10percent .

Because all of the conditions have been met, a confidence interval for p1-p2can be calculated.

03

Part(a) Step 3: Calculation

Confidence interval

p^1=x1n1=9862253≈0.438

p^2=x2n2=9232629≈0.351

For confidence level 1-α=0.99, determine zα/2=z0.005using table II (look up 0.005in the table, the z-score is then the found z-score with opposite sign):

zα/2=2.575

The endpoints of the confidence interval for p1-p2are then:

p^1-p^2-zα/2·p^11-p^1n1+p^21-p^2n2

=(0.438-0.351)-2.5750.438(1-0.438)2253+0.351(1-0.351)2629

≈0.051

p^1-p^2+zα/2·p^11-p^1n1+p^21-p^2n2

=(0.438-0.351)+2.5750.438(1-0.438)2253+0.351(1-0.351)2629

≈0.123

04

Part(b) Step 1: Given Information

Given

n1=Sample size =2253

x1=Number of successes =986

n2=Sample size =2629

x2=Number of successes =923

c=Confidence level =99%=0.99

05

Part(b) Step 2: Explanation

Result exercise part(a)

(0.051,0.123)

The confidence interval does not contain 0, then it is very unlikely that the population proportions are equal and thus there is convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

T10.11. Researchers wondered whether maintaining a patient's body temperature close to normal by heating the patient during surgery would affect wound infection rates. Patients were assigned at random to two groups: the normothermic group (patients' core temperatures were maintained at near normal, 36.5°C, with heating blankets) and the hypothermic group (patients" core temperatures were allowed to decrease to about34.5°C). If keeping patients warm during surgery alters the chance of infection, patients in the two groups should have hospital stays of very different lengths. Here are summary statistics on hospital stay (in number of days) for the two groups:

Groupnx¯sxNormothemic10412.14.4Hypothermic9614.76.5

(a) Construct and interpret a 95%confidence interval for the difference in the true mean length of hospital stay for normothermic and hypothermic patients.

(b) Does your interval in part (a) suggest that keeping patients warm during surgery affects the average length of patients' hospital staves? Justify your answer.

Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

A large toy company introduces a lot of new toys to its product line each year. The company wants to predict the demand as measured by y, first-year sales (in millions of dollars) using x, awareness of the product (as measured by the proportion of customers who had heard of the product by the end of the second month after its introduction). A random sample of 65new products was taken, and a correlation of 0.96was computed. Which of the following is a correct interpretation of this value?

(a) Ninety-six percent of the time, the least-squares regression line accurately predicts first-year sales.

(b) About 92%of the time, the proportion of people who have heard of the product by the end of the second month will correctly predict first-year sales.

(c) About 92%of first-year sales can be explained by the proportion of people who have heard of the product by the end of the second month.

(d) The least-squares regression line relating the proportion of people who have heard of the product by the end of the second month and first-year sales will have a slope of 0.96.

(e) Ninety-two percent of the variation in first-year sales can be explained by the least-squares regression line with proportion of people who have heard of the product by the end of the second month as the explanatory variable.

Pat wants to compare the cost of one- and two-bedroom apartments in the area of her college campus. She collects data for a random sample of 10 advertisements of each type. The table below shows the rents (in dollars per month) for the selected apartments.

Pat wonders if two-bedroom apartments rent for significantly more, on average than one-bedroom apartments. She decides to perform a test of H0:μ1=μ2 versus Ha:μ1<μ2, where μ1 and μ2 are the true mean rents for all one-bedroom and two-bedroom aparaments, respectively, near the campus.

(a) Name the appropriate test and show that the conditions for carrying out this test are met.

(b) The appropriate test from part (a) yields a P-value of 0.058. Interpret this P-value in context.

(c) What conclusion should Pat draw at theα=0.05 significance level? Explain.

A better drug? In a pilot study, a company's new cholesterol-reducing drug outperforms the currently available drug. If the data provide convincing

evidence that the mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than 10 milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dl) greater than with the current drug, the company will begin the expensive process of mass-producing the new drug. For the 14 subjects who were assigned at random to the current drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 54.1mg/dlwith a standard deviation of 11.93mg/dl.For the 15 subjects who were randomly assigned to the new drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 68.7mg/dlwith a standard deviation of13.3mg/dl.Graphs of the data reveal no outliers or strong skewness.

(a) Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is notH0:μ1-μ2=0-

(b) Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type Il error? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.