/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Sounds Big. Does the lower pitch... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Sounds Big. Does the lower pitch of a voice in an ad lead consumers to envision a bigger product? To test this, researchers had students listen to a radio advertisement for the new Southwest Turkey Club Sandwich at a fictitious sandwich chain, Cosmo. Half the students were randomly assigned to hear the ad spoken at a high pitch and the other half at a low pitch. In all other respects, the ads were identical, and no clues were given as to the size of the sandwich. After hearing the ad, students were asked to rate the perceived size of the sandwich on a 7-point scale, ranging from \(-3\) (much smaller than average) to \(+3\) (much larger than average). \(.\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Determine if lower pitch leads to perceptions of a larger product.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Experiment Design

The experiment involves two groups of students, each exposed to an advertisement with a different pitch level: high and low. The purpose is to study whether the pitch of a voice in an ad can influence the perception of product size.
02

Identify the Variables

The independent variable is the pitch of the voice (high or low), and the dependent variable is the perceived size of the sandwich, measured on a scale from -3 to +3.
03

Recognize the Hypothesis

The implicit hypothesis is: "Lower pitch will lead to a perception of a larger product size." The expectation is that the group exposed to the low pitch ad will give higher ratings than the group exposed to the high pitch ad.
04

Analyze the Data Collection Method

Students are randomly assigned to one of two groups to control for other variables and biases, ensuring any changes in perception are likely due to changes in pitch.
05

Consider Possible Conclusions

Depending on results, if the low pitch group rates the size higher, it supports the hypothesis. If both groups have similar ratings or the high pitch group rates higher, it may refute the hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Variable
In any experimental study, identifying the independent variable is crucial. The independent variable is the condition or factor that is manipulated by the researcher to observe its effect on the dependent variable. In the context of the sandwich advertisement experiment, the independent variable is the pitch of the voice used in the advertisement.

This variable is deliberately changed by the researchers with some students hearing a high-pitched voice and others hearing a low-pitched voice. The aim is to investigate how these different pitches might affect students' perceptions of the sandwich size. By manipulating this variable, researchers hope to draw conclusions about the relationship between pitch and perceived product size.

Understanding the role of the independent variable helps clarify the study's design and provides insight into the cause-and-effect relation being tested.
Dependent Variable
The dependent variable in an experiment is what the researcher measures. It's the presumed effect of the independent variable. Here, we are looking at the "perceived size" of the sandwich, which is what researchers expect to be affected by changes in voice pitch.

In this study, students rated the sandwich size on a scale from -3 to +3, which captures their perception after hearing the different pitch levels. This range from "much smaller than average" to "much larger than average" allows for a quantifiable measure of perception, aiding in rigorous data analysis.

The dependent variable is central to hypothesis testing. It provides the data needed to see if changes to the independent variable (pitch) lead to significant changes in perception (size). Accurately measuring the dependent variable ensures reliable and valid conclusions.
Randomized Assignment
Randomized assignment is a powerful tool in experimental research. It involves randomly allocating participants to different groups to ensure each participant has an equal chance of experiencing any given condition. This is particularly important to reduce any biases or confounding factors that could affect the outcome of the study.

In the sandwich size experiment, students were randomly assigned to hear either the high-pitch or low-pitch advertisement. This randomization is crucial as it balances out other variables that might influence students' perceptions, such as their prior experiences or personal preferences.

By using random assignment, researchers can be more confident that any differences in the perceived sandwich size are due to the pitch of the advertisement and not other unrelated factors. It strengthens the validity of the experimental results by supporting a cause-and-effect relationship.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine if there is enough evidence in a sample to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population.

In the Cosmo sandwich study, the hypothesis being tested is clear: a lower pitch in the ad will lead to a bigger perceived sandwich size. This hypothesis stems from the idea that pitch might subconsciously influence perception. The hypothesis test aims to evaluate whether the data supports this premise.

The process involves analyzing the scores given by students to see if the low-pitch group has significantly higher scores than the high-pitch group. If the low-pitch ad does lead to higher scores, then the hypothesis is supported. If not, the hypothesis might be refuted.

Hypothesis testing is essential for objectively evaluating theories and drawing conclusions based on evidence rather than assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Running and Sleep. Sufficient sleep is important for adolescents for both their neural and psychological development. Despite this, daytime sleepiness and poor physical and psychological functioning related to chronic sleep disturbances are common. A growing body of evidence suggests that exercise is associated with both better sleep and improved psychological functioning. Sixty participants were recruited from a high school in northwestern Switzerland. They were randomly assigned to either a running group or a control group, 30 to each group. The running group ran every morning for a little over 30 minutes on weekdays for a threeweek period. All participants used a sleep log for subjective evaluation of sleep, and sleep was also objectively assessed at the beginning and end of the study using a sleep electroencephalographic device that measured quantities such as sleep efficiency and time spent in the four different sleep phases. Running was found to positively impact both objective and subjective measures of sleep functioning.25 a. What are the explanatory variable(s) and the response variable(s)? b. Outline the design of the experiment. c. Here are some more details on the treatment and control groups. All participants arrived at school at 7 A.M., and the running group did two laps on the track and then ran cross country in groups of least four people for 30 minutes. The control group remained seated at the track, worked on homework, and interacted with each other. When the runners returned, all participants prepared for school and ate a breakfast that was provided. Why do you think the experimenters had the control group arrive at \(7 \mathrm{~A}\).M., interact with classmates, and have breakfast together? Explain. Do you think having the control group do these activities is important for the types of conclusions that can be reached? How? d. Time to sleep onset was measured before the beginning of the study and again at the end of the study for participants in both groups. Can this be considered a randomized controlled experiment with time to sleep onset as the response and four treatments (runners before, runners after, controls before, and controls after)? Explain why or why not.

.Treating Sinus Infections. Sinus infections are common, and doctors commonly treat them with antibiotics. Another treatment is to spray a steroid solution into the nose. A well-designed clinical trial found that these treatments, alone or in combination, do not reduce the severity or the length of sinus infections. \(\frac{34}{4}\) The clinical trial was a completely randomized experiment that assigned 240 patients at random among four treatments, as follows: a. The report of this study in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes it as a "double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled factorial trial." "Factorial" means that the treatments are formed from more than one factor. What are the factors? What do "double-blind" and "placebo-controlled" mean? b. If the random assignment of patients to treatments did a good job of eliminating bias, possible lurking variables such as smoking history, asthma, and hay fever should be similar in all four groups. After recording and comparing many such variables, the investigators said that "all showed no significant difference between groups." Explain to someone who knows no statistics what "no significant difference" means. Does it mean that the presence of all these variables was exactly the same in all four treatment groups?

Better Sleep? Is the number of times you awaken during the night affected by whet her you have a glass of wine before bed and whether you have a snack before you go to bed? Describe briefly the design of an experiment with two explanatory variables-whether or not you have a glass of wine and whether or not you have a snack before going to bed -to investigate this question. Be sure to specify what the response variable will be. Also tell how you will handle lurking variables such as amount of sleep the previous night.

More Education Improves Driving? Although traffic fatalities have been decreasing for years, this decrease has not been experienced equally in all segments of the population. In fact, although the overall rate of traffic fatalities has been decreasing, the rate has declined the most for those with more education and has actually gone up for those without high school degrees. A recent study shows that among those over 25, as education level increased from less than high school, to high school grad, to some college, to college grad, the rate of motor vehicle crash deaths decreased. \(\underline{2}\) a. What are the explanatory and response variables? b. Those with less education tend to drive cars that are older, have poorer crash test ratings, and have fewer safety features such as side airbags. Are the variables age of car, crash test rating, and presence of safety features explanatory variables, response variables, or lurking variables? Explain your reason. c. Is the association between traffic fatalities and education level good reason to think that a higher level of education actually causes an individual to be a safer driver? Explain why or why not.

Conserving Energy. Example 9.6 (page 232) describes ar experiment to learn whether providing households with digital displays or charts will reduce their electricity consumption. An executive of the electric company objects to including a control group. He says: "It would be simpler to just compare electricity use last year (before the meter or ap1 was provided) with consumption in the same period this year. If households use less electricity this year, the display or chart must be working." Explain clearly why this design is inferior to that in Example 9.6.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.