/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Unhappy Marriage, Unhappy Gut. T... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Unhappy Marriage, Unhappy Gut. To investigate how an unhappy marriage can affect an individual's health, scientists recruited 43 healthy couples between 24 and 61 years old who had been married for at least three years to take part in an experiment. 10 The researchers asked couples to discuss touchy topics likely to spark disagreement, such as money or in-laws, and taped the conversations. They used this footage to analyze verbal and nonverbal modes of conflict, including eye rolls. The team also took blood samples from the couples before and after arguing, and found that those who were most hostile toward their spouses had higher levels of LPS-binding protein, a biomarker for a leaky gut. Couples choose to argue and engage in hostile behavior when discussing touchy subjects. And anger and unhappiness that can lead to fighting may be symptoms of a physiological or mental health problem. Explain why these facts make any conclusion about cause and effect untrustworthy. Use the language of lurking variables and confounding in your explanation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study's conclusions about causality are untrustworthy due to potential lurking variables and confounding factors.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Context

The research aims to explore the impact of an unhappy marriage on the health indicators of married couples, specifically focusing on biomarkers like LPS-binding protein, which are associated with a leaky gut.
02

Identify the Main Variables

The primary variables under investigation are the levels of hostility during arguments (independent variable) and the levels of LPS-binding protein in blood samples (dependent variable).
03

Defining Lurking Variables

Lurking variables are those that are not explicitly measured or controlled in the study, yet they can affect both the independent and dependent variables, potentially skewing the results.
04

Examples of Potential Lurking Variables

Examples may include stress levels due to external factors (e.g., work pressure), underlying health conditions, or even genetic predispositions affecting both emotional responses and gut health.
05

Understanding Confounding

Confounding occurs when the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable is mixed up with the effect of a lurking variable, making it challenging to isolate the true relationship.
06

Explaining Confounding in This Study

Hostility levels could be influenced by psychological stress or mental health issues (lurking variables) that simultaneously affect gut health, leading to a misleading cause-effect relationship between marital conflict and LPS-binding protein levels.
07

Conclusion on Causality

Without controlling for lurking variables, the study cannot definitively establish a causal link between marital hostility and increased LPS-binding protein levels due to potential confounding factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Causality
Causality refers to the relationship between two events where one event is the result of the occurrence of the other. In simpler terms, if Event A causes Event B, it means that A directly brings about B. In the context of the study on unhappy marriages and health, researchers are investigating whether marital disputes (Event A) lead to changes in health indicators, specifically LPS-binding protein levels (Event B). However, just because there is a correlation between two variables, it doesn't always mean that there is a direct cause-and-effect relationship. Establishing true causality can be challenging because it requires rigorous methods like randomization and control for other factors that might influence the relationship.
Why is causality hard to prove here? There could be numerous other intervening variables affecting the results, making it hard to conclude definitively that it is solely the argumentative nature of a marriage causing changes in health indicators.
Lurking Variables
Lurking variables are unseen and often unmeasured factors that influence the primary variables in a study. They can obscure or distort the assumed relationships between the independent and dependent variables. In marriage and health studies, these lurking variables might not be obvious; however, their impact is significant.
Let's suppose a couple is fighting frequently. A lurking variable such as job-related stress might be causing both the hostility (independent variable) and increased LPS-binding protein levels (dependent variable). Other lurking variables might include sleep disturbances, dietary habits, or underlying health conditions.
By not accounting for these hidden variables, the conclusions drawn can be misleading. Recognizing lurking variables is crucial for designing a robust study and interpreting its results correctly.
Confounding
Confounding occurs when the relationship between the independent and dependent variables is distorted due to the influence of a third variable. In the marriage health study, confounding is possible if a variable, such as ongoing psychological stress, affects both hostility during arguments and health markers like LPS-binding protein levels.
For instance, if both the level of hostility and LPS-binding protein are affected by mental health issues not measured by the study, this could lead to a false association between hostile arguments and increased LPS-binding protein levels. This confounding makes it difficult to determine if marital arguments cause changes in LPS-binding protein or if another factor is at play.
Controlling for confounding variables using methods such as statistical adjustments or designing experiments to isolate their effects is essential to understand relationships accurately.
Dependent Variable
The dependent variable is the outcome that researchers measure in a study; it is what gets affected by changes or variations in the independent variable. In the discussed marriage study, the dependent variable is the level of LPS-binding protein, as it is used as an indicator of gut health.
Scientists measured LPS-binding protein levels before and after discussions to see if they rose alongside increasing hostility. By focusing on this variable, the researchers aim to determine if it changes due to stressful marital interactions. Understanding dependent variables helps in deciding what outcome is being observed and measured within an experiment. It is vital in forming hypotheses and guiding data collection.
Accurate measurement of the dependent variable ensures that the observations and data collected are valid reflections of the phenomena being studied.
Independent Variable
The independent variable is the factor that is manipulated or changed to observe its effect on the dependent variable. It is the presumed cause in a cause-and-effect relationship. In the context of this marriage study, the amount of hostility during arguments is the independent variable.
Researches investigate how changes in this variable, which they stimulated by encouraging discussions on touchy topics, might influence LPS-binding protein levels. Having a clear independent variable allows researchers to focus on how changes in that variable might affect other factors, providing insights into potential causal relationships.
However, it is essential to remember that changes in the independent variable must be carefully controlled or measured to ensure that any observed effect on the dependent variable is indeed due to alterations in the independent variable itself.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers recruited 60 undergraduate students, in exchange for course credit, for a study on the effect of recycling on how much wrapping paper subjects used to wrap a gift. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two rooms. In one room there was a large recycling bin and in the other a large trash bin. Subjects were asked to wrap a gift. Unknown to the students, the researchers were interested in how much paper the students used. The researchers found that students in the room with the recycling bin used (statistically) significantly more paper than those in the room with a trash bin. The researchers had hypothesized that people in general would rather recycle than throw things in the trash and hence would use less of a disposable resource when recycling is not available. Which of the following is an important weakness of this study? a. The study should have used a matched pairs design instead of a completely randomized design. b. Because undergraduate students were used as subjects, the results may not generalize to all adults and all situations involving disposable items. c. This is an observational study, not an experiment.

Algal Blooms. Algal blooms have become a recurring problem on many American lakes. Among other things, they can cause damage to a person's liver, kidneys, and nervous system. Phosphorus runoff from farms is one factor that contributes to algal blooms. Will inserting fertilizer into soil rather than spreading it across the surface help reduce runoff? To study this, researchers compare the effects of these two methods of fertilizing fields on the amount of phosphorus in runoff. Specific features of a field, such as slope of the ground and nature of the soil, can affect runoff, so the researchers divide each of four fields into two plots of equal size in such a way that the runoff from each plot can be measured separately. They use a matched pairs design, with the two plots in the same field as the matched pairs. a. Draw a sketch of the four fields, displaying each as a rectangle. Divide each field (rectangle) in half, each half representing one of the two plots. Label the two plots for each field as Plot 1 and Plot \(2 .\) b. Do the randomization required by the matched pairs design. That is, randomly assign the two treatments to the two plots in each field. Mark on your sketch which treatment is used in each plot.

The Font Matters! In general, when trying to change your behavior, if the effort required is perceived as high, this will be an impediment to change, whether it is modifying your diet or your study habits. Researchers divided 40 students into two groups of 20 . The first group reads instructions for an exercise program printed in an easy-to-read font (Arial, 12 point), and the second group reads identical instructions in a difficult-to-read font (Brush, 12 point). Each subject estimates how many minutes the program will take and also uses a seven-point rating scale to report whether they are likely to include the exercise program as part of their daily routine ( 7 = very likely). The researchers hypothesized that those reading about the exercise program in the more difficult-toread font would estimate that the program would take longer and, they would be less likely to make the exercise program part of their regular routine. 3 Is this an experiment? Why or why not? What are the explanatory and response variables?

Migraine is a prevalent disease characterized by headaches that are often severe and throbbing and accompanied by associated symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, vertigo, and cognitive dysfunction. A drug, fremanezumab, may be an effective preventive treatment for migraine. To investigate this, researchers give 20 migraine sufferers fremanezumab and observe whether the number of migraine days in a 12 -week period is reduced. This is a. an observational study. b. an uncontrolled experiment. c. a randomized comparative experiment.

Technology for Teaching Statistics. The Brigham Young University statistics department is performing randomized comparative experiments to compare teaching methods. Response variables include students' final-exam scores and a measure of their attitude toward statistics. One study compares two levels of technology for large lectures: standard (overhead projectors and chalk) and multimedia. The individuals in the study are the eight lectures in a basic statistics course. There are four instructors, each of whom teaches two lectures. Because the lecturers differ, their lectures form four blocks. \(\underline{20}\) Suppose the lectures and lecturers are as follows: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline Lecture & Lecturer & Lecture & Lecturer \\ \hline 1 & Grimshaw & 5 & Tolley \\ \hline 2 & Hilton & 6 & Grimshaw \\ \hline 3 & Reese & 7 & Tolley \\ \hline 4 & Reese & 8 & Hilton \\ \hline \end{tabular} Outline a block design and do the randomization that your design requires.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.