/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 .Treating Sinus Infections. Sinu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

.Treating Sinus Infections. Sinus infections are common, and doctors commonly treat them with antibiotics. Another treatment is to spray a steroid solution into the nose. A well-designed clinical trial found that these treatments, alone or in combination, do not reduce the severity or the length of sinus infections. \(\frac{34}{4}\) The clinical trial was a completely randomized experiment that assigned 240 patients at random among four treatments, as follows: a. The report of this study in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes it as a "double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled factorial trial." "Factorial" means that the treatments are formed from more than one factor. What are the factors? What do "double-blind" and "placebo-controlled" mean? b. If the random assignment of patients to treatments did a good job of eliminating bias, possible lurking variables such as smoking history, asthma, and hay fever should be similar in all four groups. After recording and comparing many such variables, the investigators said that "all showed no significant difference between groups." Explain to someone who knows no statistics what "no significant difference" means. Does it mean that the presence of all these variables was exactly the same in all four treatment groups?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The factors are antibiotics and steroid solution; "double-blind" prevents bias, and "placebo-controlled" allows accurate effect measurement. "No significant difference" means differences could be due to chance, not systematic bias.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Factors

In a factorial experiment, multiple factors are tested simultaneously. Here, the factors are the two types of treatments: antibiotics and steroid solution. Each patient receives either of these treatments, both, or a placebo. Thus, the factors are: 1) the use of antibiotics and 2) the use of a steroid solution.
02

Understand Double-Blind

"Double-blind" means that neither the patients nor the researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This design helps to prevent bias in treatment administration and in reporting outcomes.
03

Grasp Placebo-Controlled

"Placebo-controlled" indicates that one or more groups in the experiment are receiving a placebo, which is an inactive substance or treatment designed to resemble the active treatments. This assists in measuring the treatment effects more accurately by comparing them to the placebo group.
04

Interpret No Significant Difference

"No significant difference" means that, statistically speaking, any observed differences in variables such as smoking history, asthma, and hay fever between the four groups aren't enough to conclude that they are systematically different. It doesn't imply that these variables were identical across groups, but rather that any differences could be due to random chance rather than a systematic bias.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Factorial Design
In the context of a randomized clinical trial, a factorial design is an efficient way to explore the effects of multiple factors simultaneously. Simply put, it allows researchers to study the individual and combined effects of two or more treatments.
For example, in treating sinus infections, the trial described explored two main factors: the use of antibiotics and the use of a steroid solution. Each patient received either one of these treatments, a combination of both treatments, or a placebo.
  • The factorial design helps in examining not just the main effects of each factor, but also any interaction effects. Interaction effects occur when the effect of one treatment depends on the presence of another treatment.
  • This approach maximizes the data obtained from each participant and provides a comprehensive understanding of the different treatment strategies.
Ultimately, factorial design is a powerful technique for clinical trials since it can reveal complex relationships between various treatment components.
Double-Blind Study
A double-blind study is an essential aspect of conducting unbiased clinical trials. It means that neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment each participant is receiving.
This method is crucial because it helps eliminate bias, which could inadvertently affect the study's outcome.
  • Bias can occur when researchers or participants unconsciously influence the study results based on their expectations or hopes for a particular treatment outcome.
  • Keeping both parties blind to who receives which treatment ensures that differences in outcomes are solely attributable to the treatments themselves and not external influences like participant expectations or researcher behavior.
By maintaining this neutrality, double-blind studies increase the reliability and credibility of clinical trial results.
Placebo-Controlled Trial
In clinical research, a placebo-controlled trial is a gold standard for testing the efficacy of new treatments. A placebo is an inactive substance designed to resemble the treatments being tested, which serves as a control in the experiment.
The placebo group allows researchers to compare changes in the treatment groups with changes that occur naturally or because of patient expectations.
  • By including a placebo control, researchers can determine if the treatment's effects are truly due to the treatment itself, rather than participants' beliefs or psychological effects.
  • This comparison helps in isolating the real effects of the treatment, providing a clear picture of its benefits or lack thereof.
Overall, placebo-controlled trials offer robust evidence regarding the effectiveness of a treatment, ensuring that any observed effects are genuine.
Statistical Significance
The concept of statistical significance is a cornerstone in interpreting clinical trial results. When researchers say there is "no significant difference" between treatment groups, they mean that any differences observed are not strong enough to confidently say they are due to the treatments rather than random chance.
Statistical tests are employed to measure the likelihood that the observed differences are not just due to random variations.
  • If the probability is below a certain threshold (usually 5%, noted as a p-value of 0.05), the difference is considered statistically significant.
  • This does not mean the groups were identical, but that any observed variations don't exceed what would occur randomly most of the time.
Understanding statistical significance helps correctly interpret the effects of a treatment, distinguishing meaningful changes from those that occur by chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Comparing Breathing Frequencies in Swimming. Researchers from the United Kingdom studied the effect of two breathing frequencies on both performance times and several physiological parameters in front crawl swimming. - \(^{-1}\) The breathing frequencies were one breath every second stroke (B2) and one breath every fourth stroke (B4). Subjects were 10 male collegiate swimmers. Each subject swam 200 meters, once with breathing frequency B2 and once on a different day with breathing frequency B4. a. Describe the design of this matched pairs experiment, including the randomization required by this design. Explain how you might carry out the randomization. b. Could this experiment be conducted using a completely randomized design? How would the design differ from the matched pairs experiment? c. Suppose we allow each swimmer to choose a breathing frequency and then swim 200 meters using the selected frequency. Are there any problems with then comparing the performance of the two breathing frequencies?

Technology for Teaching Statistics. The Brigham Young University statistics department is performing randomized comparative experiments to compare teaching methods. Response variables include students' final-exam scores and a measure of their attitude toward statistics. One study compares two levels of technology for large lectures: standard (overhead projectors and chalk) and multimedia. The individuals in the study are the eight lectures in a basic statistics course. There are four instructors, each of whom teaches two lectures. Because the lecturers differ, their lectures form four blocks. \(\underline{20}\) Suppose the lectures and lecturers are as follows: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline Lecture & Lecturer & Lecture & Lecturer \\ \hline 1 & Grimshaw & 5 & Tolley \\ \hline 2 & Hilton & 6 & Grimshaw \\ \hline 3 & Reese & 7 & Tolley \\ \hline 4 & Reese & 8 & Hilton \\ \hline \end{tabular} Outline a block design and do the randomization that your design requires.

Red Meat and Mortality. Many studies have found an association between red meat consumption and an increased risk of chronic diseases. What is the relationship between red meat consumption and mortality? A large study followed 120,000 men and women who were free of coronary heart disease and cancer at the beginning of the study. Participants were asked detailed questions about their eating habits every 4 years, and the study spanned almost 30 years. It was found that the risk of dying at an early age-from heart disease, cancer, or any other cause, rises with the amount of red meat consumed. 23 a. Is this an observational study or an experiment? What are the explanatory and response variables? b. The authors noted that "Men and women with higher intake of red meat were less likely to be physically active and were more likely to be current smokers, to drink alcohol, and to have a higher body mass index." Explain carefully why differences in these variables make it more difficult to conclude that higher intake of red meat explains the increased death rate. What are the variables physical activity, smoking status, drinking behavior, and body mass index called? c. Suggest at least one lurking variable related to diet that may be confounded with higher intake of red meat. Explain why you chose the variable or variables you chose.

What is the effect of a salesperson's demeanor on a customer? When purchasing clothing, it was hypothesized that for a more luxurious brand, such as Louis Vuitton, consumers would aspire more toward the brand if the salesperson were condescending, while for a mass market brand such as American Eagle, the opposite would be true. Participants in the study read the following hypothetical scenario: 22 Imagine that you're out shopping for some new clothes. You decide to go to (Louis Vuitton) because you've always liked the clothing there. As you are browsing the store, you encounter a saleswoman. She greets you and (condescendingly) asks you if she can help you find what you're looking for. For the mass market brand, Louis Vuitton is replaced by American Eagle, and for the salesperson demeanor, the word condescending is omitted for the neutral condition. Three hundred sixty participants were assigned at random to one of the four conditions: (luxury brand, condescending), (luxury brand, neutral), (mass market brand, condescending), or (mass market brand, neutral). An aspiration measure toward the product was computed based on the responses to questions about liking the product, distinctiveness, fashionability, and desire to be seen wearing the product. This is an a. experiment with four factors corresponding to the four conditions. b. experiment with factors corresponding to the different brands. c. experiment with two factors, luxury/mass market and condescending/neutral.

Prayer and Healing. To study the effect of prayer on healing, patients with health problems are randomly divided into two groups. In one group, intercessors pray for the health of the patients. In the other group, patients are not prayed for. Patients do not know that they are being prayed for, and the persons who are praying do not come in contact with the patients for whom they pray. Medical outcomes in the two groups of patients are compared. Finally, the medical treatment team is also blind to the prayer group status of individual patients. \(\frac{16}{}\) Is this experiment double-blind? What are the treatments? Is one of the treatments a placebo? Explain your answers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.