/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 How Far Do Rich Parents Take Us?... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

How Far Do Rich Parents Take Us? How much education children get is strongly associated with the wealth and social status of their parents. In social science jargon, this is socioeconomic status, or SES. But the SES of parents has little influence on whether children who have graduated from college go on to yet more education. One study looked at whether college graduates took the graduate admissions tests for business, law, and other graduate programs. The effects of the parents' SES on taking the LSAT for law school were "both statistically insignificant and small" a. What does "statistically insignificant" mean? b. Why is it important that the effects were small in size as well as insignificant?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Statistically insignificant means little evidence of SES effect; small size implies minimal practical impact.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding 'Statistically Insignificant'

Statistically insignificant means that the observed effect or difference could likely have occurred by random chance. In this context, if the effect of parents' SES on taking the LSAT is statistically insignificant, it implies that there is no reliable evidence from the data to suggest that a higher or lower SES affects whether college graduates take the LSAT.
02

Explaining Importance of Small Effect Size

Small effect size indicates that even if there were a statistically significant relationship, the actual impact of parents' SES on the decision to take the LSAT is minimal. In practical terms, this suggests that SES is not a major factor influencing this particular decision, implying that other factors may play a more significant role.
03

Conclusion of Impact of SES

Given that the effect of parents' SES on taking the LSAT is both statistically insignificant and small, it is implied that the SES barely affects the graduate admissions tests decisions. Therefore, efforts to improve graduate school access might benefit more from addressing other influential factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Socioeconomic Status and Education
Socioeconomic status (SES) is a measure that encompasses a person's income, education level, and job status. This concept is important in education because it often influences the opportunities and resources available to children. Parents with higher SES typically have more resources to support their children's educational journey, such as access to better schools or educational materials.

However, the influence of parental SES changes as children progress through their educational careers. While children from higher SES backgrounds often have more access to education early on, this advantage may diminish when examining specific outcomes like taking graduate admissions tests.
  • Higher SES may influence early education levels
  • The impact may decrease for specific professional decisions
  • Other factors might play a larger role in advanced education choices
Understanding SES is crucial when evaluating educational policies and interventions aimed at leveling the playing field for students of varying backgrounds.
Understanding Effect Size
Effect size is a statistical measurement that reflects the magnitude of a relationship between variables, and it works as a complement to statistical significance. It provides information about how large or meaningful the difference or association is in practical terms. In educational research, knowing the effect size helps determine whether an intervention or factor truly makes a notable difference in outcomes.

In the context of SES and taking the LSAT, a small effect size indicates that, even if the results were statistically significant, the actual impact of SES on the decision to take the test would be minimal.
  • Effect size helps measure real-world significance
  • A small effect size points to a minor impact, even if statistically significant
  • Researchers often look for both significance and meaningful effect size
When examining educational influences, researchers consider effect sizes to prioritize findings that have practical implications beyond mere statistical reports.
Grasping Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a test used to determine whether the results of a study could have occurred by chance. It tells researchers if they can confidently attribute results to a specific factor rather than random variation.

For example, if a study finds that parental SES has a statistically insignificant effect on taking the LSAT, it means that any observed differences are likely due to randomness, not due to SES itself.
  • Assesses the likelihood of results occurring by chance
  • Low p-values (commonly below 0.05) indicate high significance
  • Statistically insignificant results suggest no strong evidence of impact
Statistical significance is critical in educational research to ensure findings are reliable and worthy of further exploration. However, it's important to not only find statistically significant results but also to consider their effect sizes to ensure findings have practical importance as well.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This Wine Stinks. How sensitive are the untrained noses of students? Exercise 16.27 (page 381) gives the lowest levels of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) that 10 students could detect. You want to estimate the mean DMS odor threshold among all students, and you would be satisfied to estimate the mean to within \(\pm 0.1\) with \(99 \%\) confidence. The standard deviation of the odor threshold for untrained noses is known to be \(\sigma=7\) micrograms per liter of wine. How large an SRS of untrained students do you need?

The most important condition for sound conclusions from statistical inference is usually that a. the P-value we calculate is small. b. the population distribution is exactly Normal. c. the data can be thought of as a random sample from the population of interest.

Searching for ESP. A researcher looking for evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 1000 subjects. Forty-three of these subjects do significantly better \((P<0.05)\) than random guessing. a. Forty-three seems like a lot of people, but you can't conclude that these 43 people have ESP. Why not? b. What should the researcher now do to test whether any of these 43 subjects have ESP?

Type I and II Errors. Section 13.7 (page 311) discusses the prostatespecific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer. The test is not always correct, sometimes indicat ing prostate cancer (test is positive) when it is not present (a false positive) and often missing prostate cancer (test is negative) that is present (a false negative). Here is a table of the four possibilities. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & Test Result \\ \hline Cancer present & Positive & Negative \\ \hline Cancer absent & False positive & False negative \\ \hline \end{tabular} If we treat "Cancer absent" as our null hypothesis and the PSA test result as our test statistic, which of the four combinations corresponds to a Type I error? Which corresponds to a Type II error?

Reducing the Gender Gap. In many science disciplines, women are outperformed by men on test scores. Will "values affirmation training" improve self- confidence and hence performance of women relative to men in science courses? A study conducted at a large university compares the scores of men and women at the end of a large introductory physics course on a nationally normed standardized test of conceptual physics, the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). Half the women in the course were randomly assigned to values affirmation training during the course; the other half received no training. The study reports that there was a significant difference \((P<0.01)\) in the gap between men's and women's scores, although the gap for women who received the values affirmation training was much smaller than that for women who did not receive training. As evidence that this gap was reduced for woman who received the training, the study also reports that a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean scores on the FMCE exam between women who received the training and those who didn't is \(13 \pm 8\) points. You are a faculty member in the physics department, and the provost, who is interested in women in science, asks you about the study. a. Explain in simple language what "a significant difference \((P<0.01)\) " means. b. Explain clearly and briefly what "95\% confidence" means. c. Is this study good evidence that requiring values affirmation training of all female students would greatly reduce the gender gap in scores on science tests in college courses?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.