/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 Type I and II Errors. Section 13... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Type I and II Errors. Section 13.7 (page 311) discusses the prostatespecific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer. The test is not always correct, sometimes indicat ing prostate cancer (test is positive) when it is not present (a false positive) and often missing prostate cancer (test is negative) that is present (a false negative). Here is a table of the four possibilities. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline & Test Result \\ \hline Cancer present & Positive & Negative \\ \hline Cancer absent & False positive & False negative \\ \hline \end{tabular} If we treat "Cancer absent" as our null hypothesis and the PSA test result as our test statistic, which of the four combinations corresponds to a Type I error? Which corresponds to a Type II error?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Type I error: False positive. Type II error: False negative.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Hypotheses

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is typically the statement that there is no effect or no difference. In this scenario, the null hypothesis is 'Cancer absent,' meaning that the test assumes no cancer is present unless evidence is given to reject this hypothesis.
02

Identifying Type I Error

A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. In this context, it means concluding, based on the test result, that cancer is present (Positive result), when, in reality, cancer is absent. This corresponds to a 'False positive' result.
03

Identifying Type II Error

A Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is actually false. Here, this means failing to detect cancer (Negative result) when cancer is indeed present. This corresponds to a 'False negative' result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
In statistical analysis, a Type I error is a crucial concept that you need to understand. It occurs during hypothesis testing when the null hypothesis, which suggests there is no effect or no difference, is wrongly rejected despite being true. Imagine you're taking a test for a disease like prostate cancer, where the test indicates a positive result, meaning the disease is present, but in fact, the disease is absent.
This leads to a 'False Positive'. Here, the PSA test suggests the presence of cancer, but the reality is that the cancer is absent.
Key characteristics of a Type I error include:
  • Rejecting a true null hypothesis
  • Concluding effect or presence when there is none
  • Results in a false positive diagnosis in medical testing
Understanding Type I errors is vital for interpreting statistical outcomes, as it impacts the trustworthiness of the results. The probability of committing a Type I error is denoted by alpha (\(\alpha\)), typically set at 0.05 or 5%, meaning there's a 5% risk of rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Type II Error
Type II errors occur when, in hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is falsely accepted even though it is not true. This error results in a 'False Negative'. In the context of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, this would mean the test results indicate that there is no presence of cancer when, indeed, the cancer is there but undetected.
Type II errors can have significant implications, particularly in medical testing, as they lead to missed diagnoses, allowing diseases to progress untreated.
Here are some important points to consider about Type II errors:
  • Failing to reject a false null hypothesis
  • Missing a true effect or presence
  • More problematic in medical testing due to health risks
The probability of committing a Type II error is denoted by beta (\(\beta\)). When designing tests, balancing the risk of Type I and Type II errors is critical, as both influence the test's reliability and effectiveness.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a foundational concept in statistics used to determine the validity of a hypothesis by using data. It involves a structured process to test claims about a population based on sample data.
Here’s a simple breakdown of the hypothesis testing steps:
  • Formulate the Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): A statement that indicates no effect, no difference, or no change. For the PSA test, \(H_0\) would be 'Cancer absent.'
  • Formulate the Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): A statement that contradicts the null hypothesis, suggesting an effect, difference, or change. In this case, \(H_1\) is 'Cancer present.'
  • Select a significance level (\(\alpha\)): This determines the probability threshold for rejecting \(H_0\), commonly set at 0.05.
  • Calculate the test statistic and p-value: These numerical values determine whether the observed data supports rejecting \(H_0\).
  • Make a decision: Depending on the p-value and \(\alpha\), you'll decide whether to reject or fail to reject the \(H_0\).
Hypothesis testing is essential in verifying scientific claims and making informed decisions based on statistical evidence. It helps quantify uncertainty and guides researchers in making objective conclusions about their studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling at the Gour met Food Store. A market researcher chooses at random from men entering a gourmet food store. One outcome of the study is a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean of "the highest price you would pay for a bottle of wine." a. Explain why this confidence interval does not give useful information about the population of all men. b. Explain why it may give useful information about the population of men who shop at gourmet food stores.

Sample Size and Margin of Error. Example 16.1 (page 368) described NHANES data on the body mass index (BMI) of 936 young men. The mean BMI in the sample was \(x=27.2 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). We treated these data as an SRS from a Normally distributed population with standard deviation \(\sigma=11.6\) a. Suppose that we had an SRS of just 100 young men. What would be the margin of error for \(95 \%\) confidence? b. Find the margins of error for \(95 \%\) confidence based on SRSs of 400 young men and 1600 young men. c. Compare the three margins of error. How does increasing the sample size change the margin of error of a confidence interval when the confidence level and population standard deviation remain the same?

Error Probabilities. You read that a statistical test at significance level \(\alpha=0.05\) has power \(0.80\). What are the probabilities of Type I and Type Il errors for this test?

How Valium Works. Valium is a common antidepressant and sedative. A study investigated how valium works by comparing its effect on sleep in seven genetically modified mice and eight normal control mice. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The authors say that this lack of significance "is related to the large inter-individual variability that is also reflected in the low power (20\%) of the test." 13 a. Explain exactly what power \(20 \%\) against a specific alternative means. b. Explain in simple language why tests having low power often fail to give evidence against a null hypothesis even when the null hypothesis is really false. c. What fact about this experiment most likely explains the low power?

A writer in a medical journal says: "An uncontrolled experiment in 37 women found a significantly improved mean clinical symptom score after treatment. Methodologic flaws make it difficult to interpret the result of this study." The writer is skeptical about the significant improvement because a. there is no control group, so the improvement might be due to the placebo effect or to the fact that many medical conditions improve over time. b. the \(P\)-value given was \(P=0.048\), which is too large to be convincing. c. the response variable might not have an exactly Normal distribution in the population.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.