/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Asking Teens about Vaping. A sur... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Asking Teens about Vaping. A survey of more than 44,000 teenagers asked the subjects if they had used vaping devices in the past 12 months. In a follow-up question, subjects were asked what they vaped. Should consent of parents be required to ask minors about drug use and other such issues, or is consent of the minors themselves enough? Give reasons for your opinion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Parental consent should be required to protect minors and uphold ethical standards.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Legal and Ethical Considerations

Identify the legal requirements and ethical guidelines regarding surveys involving minors. Typically, parental consent is required because minors are not legally able to provide fully informed consent themselves.
02

Define Minors and Vaping Context

Consider that the target group consists of teenagers, who are below the age of majority. The topic of vaping, especially when related to drug use, can be sensitive and potentially harmful, necessitating additional safeguards.
03

Review Parental Rights and Concerns

Examine the ethical importance of parental rights, which are recognized in many areas of law and society. Parents are generally deemed the best decision-makers for their children’s welfare, which extends to consent in surveys involving drug-related questions.
04

Consider Autonomy and the Role of Minors

Evaluate the extent to which minors can understand and consent to participation in surveys. While teenagers should be respected for their growing autonomy, they may not yet fully grasp the implications of their participation, especially regarding sensitive topics.
05

Weigh the Practical Implications

Determine whether requiring parental consent might introduce biases or logistical challenges, such as reduced participation rates. However, weigh this against the ethical necessity of safeguarding minors.
06

Formulate a Conclusion

Integrate the analysis from the previous steps to conclude that parental consent should generally be required to protect minors' welfare and uphold parents' rights in decisions involving sensitive survey topics like drug use.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Parental Consent
Parental consent is a crucial component when conducting research involving minors. It serves to protect children by ensuring that a parent or guardian is aware of and agrees to their participation in research activities.
This is especially important in surveys dealing with potentially sensitive topics like vaping or drug use. Parents are typically viewed as the primary protectors of their children's interests. Their involvement helps to assure that the child's welfare is a top priority. Parental consent provides an added layer of insurance that the survey content is appropriate.
This approach considers the family’s values and beliefs, acknowledging the parent’s role in guiding ethical and moral decisions for their child. Research that involves minors and sensitive topics often demands extra care. Securing parental consent not only fulfills legal requirements but also builds trust with the parents, allowing for a clearer understanding of the research process and goals.
Minors in Research
Involving minors in research requires careful consideration of their ability to understand the research's nature and implications. Minors, defined as individuals under the age of legal majority, are still developing cognitively and emotionally.
This development stage makes them more vulnerable to misunderstanding risks associated with their participation in studies, especially those involving sensitive subjects like vaping. When minors are the subject of research, ethical principles dictate that their participation must be handled with heightened sensitivity. Researchers must ensure that any surveys or interviews are clear and age-appropriate.
This ensures that minors have a proper understanding of their involvement and what is being asked of them. Plus, minor participants should also be informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time. Although minors may consent to participate in research, their consent is not enough to fulfill ethical guidelines fully. Thus, parental consent provides the necessary oversight and protection.
Ethical Guidelines
Ethical guidelines are the foundation for conducting research responsibly, especially when minors are involved. These guidelines help in maintaining the integrity of the research process while protecting participants from harm. Ethical research involving minors requires adherence to several principles:
  • Informed Consent: Ensures that participants understand the research and voluntarily agree to participate. Since minors cannot legally provide full consent, parental approval is essential.
  • Beneficence: Researchers should aim to benefit participants and minimize potential harm.
  • Confidentiality: Protect the privacy of minors by safely handling and storing data.
  • Justice: Equitable selection and treatment of participants, ensuring fairness in the research process.

When conducting studies on sensitive topics, researchers must be especially diligent in implementing these ethical guidelines to support the well-being of minor participants and preserve the validity of the research.
Sensitive Topics in Surveys
Sensitive topics in surveys, such as drug use or vaping, require careful planning and sensitivity from researchers. These topics can evoke strong emotions or stigmatization among participants, particularly if the participants are minors. Surveying on sensitive issues demands that questions be phrased carefully to avoid embarrassment or distress. Researchers must be trained to handle any adverse reactions participants may have and provide appropriate support or referrals if necessary. It's essential to ensure a comfortable environment for participants. This might mean completing surveys in private settings or offering anonymity, where possible, to encourage honest responses.
This method can help to reduce the potential anxiety or fear associated with disclosing personal experiences with sensitive topics. Minors are particularly vulnerable in surveys covering sensitive discussions. Ethical practices such as obtaining parental consent, properly informing participants about the nature of the questions, and ensuring their right to refuse participation can help mitigate these challenges.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who Reviews? Government regulations require that an institutional review board consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider. a. Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists? b. Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A member of the clergy? An activist for patients' rights?)

Political Polls. The presidential election campaign is in full swing, and the candidates have hired polling organizations to take sample surveys to find out what the voters think about the issues. What information should the pollsters be required to give out? a. What does the standard of informed consent require the pollsters to tell potential respondents? b. The standards accepted by polling organizations also require giving respondents the name and address of the organization that carries out the poll. Why do you think this is required? c. The polling organization usually has a professional name, such as "Samples Incorporated," so respondents don't know that the poll is being paid for by a political party or candidate. Would revealing the sponsor to respondents bias the poll? Should the sponsor always be announced whenever poll results are made public?

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. a. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. b. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only available for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. c. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

Immortal Cells. In 1951 Henrietta Lacks died at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from complications due to cervical cancer. Some of her cells were taken without her permission. It was subsequently discovered that these were "immortal cells," cells that do not die after a set number of cell divisions. These were the first human cells grown in a lab that were naturally immortal, making them invaluable for research. For example, in medical experiments if the cells died, they could simply be discarded and the experiment attempted again on fresh cells from the culture. Henrietta's "immortal" cells became the He-La cell line and have been used to develop the polio vaccine and flu treatments and in HIV/AIDS, leukemia, tuberculosis, and Parkinson's disease research, just to name a few applications. The research from He-La cells has saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people. Does the benefit society received from the cells of Henrietta Lacks outweigh the ethics of failing to receive permission to use the cells from anyone in the Lacks family, including Henrietta herself? Explain your reasoning.

Charging for Data? Data produced by the government are often available free or at low cost to private users. For example, satellite weather data produced by the U.S. National Weather Service are available free to TV stations for their weather reports and to anyone on the web. Opinion 1: Govermment data should be available to everyone at mirtimal cost. European governments, on the other hand, charge TV stations for weather data. Opinion 2: The satellites are expensive, and the TV stations are making a profit from their weather services, so they should share the cost. Which opinion do you support, and why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.