/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Charging for Data? Data produced... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Charging for Data? Data produced by the government are often available free or at low cost to private users. For example, satellite weather data produced by the U.S. National Weather Service are available free to TV stations for their weather reports and to anyone on the web. Opinion 1: Govermment data should be available to everyone at mirtimal cost. European governments, on the other hand, charge TV stations for weather data. Opinion 2: The satellites are expensive, and the TV stations are making a profit from their weather services, so they should share the cost. Which opinion do you support, and why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Support Opinion 1 for greater accessibility and public benefit.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Scenario

First, we need to identify the key components of the scenario. The main issue here is whether government data, specifically satellite weather data, should be provided for free or at cost to private entities like TV stations.
02

Analyze Opinion 1

Opinion 1 suggests that government data should be available at minimal cost. This implies an argument for accessibility and transparency, possibly enhancing the public's right to information and supporting public services without additional costs.
03

Analyze Opinion 2

Opinion 2 advocates for charging TV stations because these stations profit from using the data, suggesting they should contribute to the costs of generating this data. This perspective emphasizes fairness in sharing the costs among beneficiaries.
04

Evaluate the Benefits and Drawbacks

Consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of each opinion. Minimal cost access promotes widespread usage and innovation but may burden public budgets. Charging for data might ensure sustained funding for data production but could restrict access and limit small entities.
05

Formulate a Supported Opinion

Consider principles such as fairness, economic efficiency, and public good. Decide which opinion aligns with these principles and your values. For example, if public access and societal benefits are prioritized, you might support minimal cost access.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Government Data
Government data plays a pivotal role in the functioning of both public and private sectors. Such data is often generated through national resources and is seen as a public asset. When we talk about government data, we generally refer to various types of data including health records, statistical reports, weather data, and more. These datasets are essential for several reasons:

- They provide critical information for public safety, such as weather alerts and emergency services.
- They drive innovation by providing raw data that can be used by companies and researchers to create new products and solutions.
- They enable citizens to stay informed about governmental activities and policy changes.

Due to their immense value, a significant debate revolves around whether such data should be freely accessible to everyone or if it should have a cost attached. Balancing accessibility with the costs of data production and maintenance is a central concern for policymakers.
Cost Sharing
Cost sharing involves distributing the financial obligations associated with a resource among its users. In terms of government data, particularly costly datasets like satellite weather data, the discussion around cost sharing arises because these resources require substantial investment to build and maintain.

When data is offered at no cost, the government shoulders the financial burden, often using taxpayer money. The principle of cost sharing suggests that those who directly benefit from the data—such as TV stations using weather data for commercial gain—should contribute to the costs. This model has some advantages:

- It ensures a more equitable distribution of costs, reducing the load on public funding.
- It highlights the commercial value that these entities derive from the data.

However, implementing cost sharing also comes with challenges, such as determining fair pricing models and ensuring that smaller organizations are not disadvantaged, which could stifle innovation and inclusiveness.
Public Right to Information
The public right to information is a fundamental aspect of democratic societies. It stipulates that citizens should have access to government-held information to promote transparency and accountability. In the context of government data, this means that information like weather data should be readily available to the public.

This right supports several important societal objectives:

- It empowers citizens by providing them access to essential information which can be crucial for personal and communal safety and planning.
- It fosters trust in governmental institutions by making their operations visible and understandable to the public.
- It enables informed decision-making by citizens, businesses, and governments, promoting a more knowledgeable society.

While this right suggests minimal costs for access, challenges include maintaining high-quality data production without adequate funding through user fees, which could compromise the availability of such data.
Economic Efficiency
Economic efficiency in the context of public data access refers to the optimal allocation and utilization of data resources to maximize benefits for society. Providing data freely or at a minimal cost can lead to widespread use, encouraging innovation and new applications that benefit the public.

The key benefits of economically efficient data distribution include:

- Enhancing the collective welfare by supporting a broad range of activities, from scientific research to commercial endeavors.
- Promoting competition and innovation, as more entities can access data to develop new products and services.
- Reducing market inefficiencies by equipping companies and individuals with the information needed for better decision making.

However, economic efficiency must be weighed against the financial sustainability of data production. Over-reliance on public funding can strain resources, while introducing fees can deter broader access and innovation. Finding the right balance is crucial to achieving true economic efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Minimal Risk? You are a member of your college's institutional review board. You must decide whether several research proposals qualify for less rigorous review because they involve only minimal risk to subjects. Federal regulations say that "minimal risk" means the risks are no greater than "those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests." That's vague. Which of these do you think qualifies as "minimal risk"? a. Give subjects an experimental drug that may produce temporary dizziness as a side effect, and warn the subjects about this risk. b. Give subjects an experimental drug that may produce episodes of depression as a side effect. c. Recruit women for a study on physical abuse from spouses or partners by putting up posters in the surrounding community. The posters instruct any interested women who have experienced abuse to call the lab phone number and leave a message with their name and phone numbers. d. Recruit women for a study on physical abuse from spouses or partners by visiting shelters for victims of domestic violence and asking for volunteers. e. Asking women if they have had an abortion in a country where it is illegal. f. Asking women if they have had an abortion in a country in which it is legal but the issue is fraught with religious and political controversy.

Show Me the Data. In Example.10.1 (page 250), we mentioned that researchers are not always completely honest about their data. In the interests of transparency, some suggest that researchers should be required to publish their data as part of any publication whose findings are based on these data. In defense of keeping data private, researchers expend considerable time and effort in collecting data. The data may be part of ongoing research and used in future publications. Making it public before researchers have the opportunity to complete all their research involving the data allows others to exploit the data for their own advantage (perhaps preempting publications by the researchers who collected the data) without having to expend any effort in collecting the data themselves. This seems unfair. Should researchers be required to publish their data along with their findings based on the data? If not, can you suggest how one might confirm the accuracy of any findings based on the data while preventing others from using the data to their advantage?

Who Reviews? Government regulations require that an institutional review board consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider. a. Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists? b. Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A member of the clergy? An activist for patients' rights?)

Deceiving Subjects. Students sign up to be subjects in a psychology experiment. When they arrive, they are placed in a room and assigned a task. During the task, the subject hears a loud thud from an adjacent room and then a piercing cry for help. Some subjects are placed in a room by themselves. Others are placed in a room with "confederates" (a research methods term for accomplices) who have been instructed by the researcher to look up upon hearing the cry and then return to their task. The treatments being compared are whether the subject is alone in the room or in the room with confederates, will the subject ignore the cry for help? The students had agreed to take part in an unspecified study, and the true nature of the experiment is explained to them afterward. Do you think this study is therefore ethically acceptable?

AIDS Trials in Africa. The drug programs that treat AIDS in rich countries are very expensive, and some African nations cannot afford to give them to large numbers of people. Yet AIDS is more common in parts of Africa than anywhere else. "Short-course" drug programs that are much less expensive might help, for example, in preventing infected pregnant women from passing the infection to their unborn children. Is it ethical to compare a short-course program with a placebo in a clinical trial? Some say No: this is a double standard because, in rich countries, the full drug program would be the control treatment. Others say Yes: the intent is to find treatments that are practical in Africa, and the trial does not withhold any treatment that subjects would otherwise receive. What do you think?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.