/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Undue Influence? Undue influence... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. a. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. b. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only available for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. c. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Scenario C constitutes undue influence as it pressures students to comply for grades.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Undue Influence

Undue influence in obtaining informed consent refers to a situation where excessive or inappropriate rewards or overtones are provided to obtain someone's compliance. It is essential to identify if participants feel pressured to participate because the rewards seem too beneficial or if there are no alternatives.
02

Analyze Scenario A

In Scenario A, students are offered extra credit for participating in a study, but they can also earn extra credit through alternative means if they choose not to participate. This alternative option mitigates undue influence, as participation is not the only way to obtain the reward.
03

Analyze Scenario B

In Scenario B, extra credit is available only through participation in the research study. However, it is granted even if the student withdraws early. While there is an incentive, the flexibility to withdraw reduces the pressure, lessening the undue influence.
04

Analyze Scenario C

In Scenario C, students are offered extra credit, but only if they complete the entire study. This puts significant pressure on students to participate and continue, which constitutes an undue influence as they might feel compelled to comply to secure their grades.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Informed Consent
Informed consent is a fundamental part of ethical research. It means getting permission from participants after they fully understand what the research involves. Researchers need to provide clear and complete information about the study. This includes:
  • The purpose of the research
  • The procedures involved
  • Any potential risks and benefits
  • Alternatives available to not participating
Participants must be given enough information to decide whether or not they want to be involved. It is important they feel free to say "no" without any pressure or fear of consequences. In research, informed consent ensures that participation is voluntary and based on a clear understanding of what it entails. This process protects both the rights and the welfare of the participants involved.
Research Ethics
Research ethics are principles that guide researchers to conduct their studies responsibly and with integrity. At the core of research ethics is the respect for the dignity and rights of research participants. Ethical practices in research include:
  • Ensuring voluntary participation through informed consent
  • Protecting participants' privacy and confidentiality
  • Avoiding conflicts of interest
  • Being honest and transparent about the research
  • Ensuring that all incentives do not coerce participation
In the exercise, research ethics would be compromised if the means of obtaining consent involved any undue influence. This means offering rewards that might unduly persuade someone to participate. Responsible researchers carefully consider incentives to ensure they do not overshadow the voluntary nature of participation.
Student Incentives
Student incentives are rewards given to students for participating in research. While incentives can motivate participation, it is vital they are balanced and ethical. If an incentive is too attractive, it could lead to undue influence, where participation is influenced more by the reward than a genuine interest in the study. When determining whether incentives are appropriate, consider:
  • The fairness of the offered reward
  • Availability of alternative methods to earn the same reward
  • The overall impact of the incentive on the decision to participate
Using incentives, like extra credit, is common in educational settings. In Scenario A from the exercise, an alternative way to earn extra credit reduced the potential for undue influence, making it an ethical approach. In contrast, Scenario C required completion of the study to receive the reward, which could pressure students and raise ethical concerns about undue influence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

AIDS Trials in Africa. The drug programs that treat AIDS in rich countries are very expensive, and some African nations cannot afford to give them to large numbers of people. Yet AIDS is more common in parts of Africa than anywhere else. "Short-course" drug programs that are much less expensive might help, for example, in preventing infected pregnant women from passing the infection to their unborn children. Is it ethical to compare a short-course program with a placebo in a clinical trial? Some say No: this is a double standard because, in rich countries, the full drug program would be the control treatment. Others say Yes: the intent is to find treatments that are practical in Africa, and the trial does not withhold any treatment that subjects would otherwise receive. What do you think?

Informed Consent, Continued. Sometimes exceptions can be made to the informed consent process. Examples include education research studies with normal classroom activities posing no unusual risks (like trying a lecture versus an active learning activity to teach a new concept) or behavioral studies in a public place. These ethical guidelines were written in the middle of the twentieth century, well before the Internet and social media existed. Do you believe that Facebook and other social media sites count as "public places"? If so, does that change your answer to whether informed consent was necessary for this experiment?

Coercion? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations for informed consent state that "an investigator shall seek such consent only under circumst ances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence." - Coercion occurs when an overt or implicit threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes coercion? Discuss. a. A researcher has developed a vaccine against a new virus. The researcher is recruiting healthy adult volunteers from an inner city to determine if the vaccine is safe in humans. Volunteers will be paid for their participation. One participant tells one of the research nurses that he would not have enrolled in the study, but he recently lost his job and needs the money. He claims that he feels as though he has no alternative but to participate. b. A research nurse is asked to consent and provide samples for three minimal risk studies during her first week on the job. She is told "everyone working here is enrolled in these studies."

Asking Teens about Vaping. A survey of more than 44,000 teenagers asked the subjects if they had used vaping devices in the past 12 months. In a follow-up question, subjects were asked what they vaped. Should consent of parents be required to ask minors about drug use and other such issues, or is consent of the minors themselves enough? Give reasons for your opinion.

Deceiving Subjects. Researchers are interested in assessing the "Good Samaritan" behavior of unsuspecting travelers in a subway train. An actor, either apparently drunk or carrying a cane, would collapse, and the number of helpful interventions by travelers would be observed and recorded. The results of the experiment determined that people were generally very helpful, although they were a little more reluctant to help a drunk. Do you think this study is ethically okay? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.