/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 The Willowbrook Hepatitis Studie... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Willowbrook Hepatitis Studies. In the 1960 s, children entering the Willowbrook State School, an institution for the intellectually disabled, were deliberately infected with hepatitis. The researchers argued that almost all children in the institution quickly became infected anyway. The studies showed for the first time the existence of two strains of hepatitis. This finding contributed to the development of effective vaccines. Despite these valuable results, the Willowbrook studies are now considered an example of unethical research. Explain why, according to current ethical standards, useful results are not enough to allow a study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Willowbrook studies violated ethical standards by lacking informed consent, exploiting a vulnerable group, and prioritizing results over participant welfare.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Context

In the 1960s, a controversial study was conducted at the Willowbrook State School where children were deliberately infected with hepatitis. While this led to the identification of two strains of hepatitis, it raises significant ethical concerns today.
02

Ethical Standards in Research

According to current ethical guidelines, research must adhere to specific ethical standards such as the principles of beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. Important elements include informed consent and minimizing harm.
03

Evaluating Consent

In the Willowbrook study, informed consent was either not obtained or was inadequate. Current ethical standards require that participants (or their guardians) must be fully informed about the research and voluntarily agree to participate.
04

Ensuring Beneficence

Researchers must ensure that the benefits of a study outweigh its risks. Deliberately infecting children, who are a vulnerable population, with hepatitis poses significant risks and harms which outweigh potential benefits.
05

Justice and Fairness

The principle of justice requires fair selection of participants, ensuring that no group is unfairly burdened or excluded from the benefits of research. In the Willowbrook study, the children were selected due to their attendance at the institution, not because it was fair or just, but because they were accessible.
06

Conclusion

Despite the useful outcomes of the Willowbrook studies, they violated fundamental ethical principles by exploiting a vulnerable population without proper consent or considerations of justice and beneficence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Informed Consent
One of the foundational pillars of ethical research is informed consent. This principle ensures that participants are fully informed about the nature, purpose, risks, and benefits of the study.
It is essential for maintaining the autonomy and dignity of participants, allowing them to make a voluntary decision about their involvement.

Key Elements of Informed Consent:

- **Clear Communication**: Participants must receive clear, understandable information about what the study entails. - **Voluntary Participation**: Individuals must have the freedom to decide whether to participate, without any pressure or coercion. - **Competency**: The participant must have the mental capacity to understand the information provided and make an informed decision. - **Documentation**: Consent is usually documented through a signed form, though verbal consent may be acceptable in certain situations.
In the Willowbrook study, the principle of informed consent was not properly followed. Many parents were not fully aware of the potential risks and the nature of the infection intentionally administered to their children. This lack of transparency breached ethical guidelines and compromised the rights and safety of participants.
Beneficence
Beneficence is a key ethical principle that emphasizes the responsibility of researchers to minimize harm and maximize benefits to participants.
This principle ensures that the well-being of the participant is a priority in any research project.

Principles of Beneficence:

- **Risk-Benefit Analysis**: Researchers must thoroughly assess whether the potential benefits of the study justify the risks involved. - **Minimizing Harm**: Efforts should be made to reduce any potential physical, psychological, or emotional harm to participants. - **Enhancing Welfare**: The research should aim to positively contribute to the subject's well-being whenever possible.
In the case of the Willowbrook hepatitis studies, children were deliberately infected with a virus, which presented significant risks without adequate justification. The researchers at Willowbrook failed to ensure that the benefits to the children or society outweighed the harm caused, violating the ethical standard of beneficence.
Justice and Fairness
The principle of justice and fairness in research is about ensuring that the selection process for participants is equitable and that no group is disproportionally burdened or benefits disadvantagedly.
It involves distributing the risks and benefits of the study justly among all those involved.

Core Aspects of Justice in Research:

- **Fair Selection of Participants**: Participants should be chosen based on the research needs and aims, rather than convenience or manipulability. - **Avoidance of Exploitation**: Vulnerable groups should not be taken advantage of due to their accessibility or lack of power. - **Equitable Distribution of Benefits and Burdens**: The advantages of the research should be available to all participants, while risks should not be inequitably imposed on any single group.
In the Willowbrook case, researchers selected children from a vulnerable population at an institution for the intellectually disabled.
This choice was not driven by a fair distribution of research burdens but rather by the accessibility and perceived lack of power of this group to resist.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Informed Consent. Facebook claims that its data privacy policy covered this experiment because it included this line: "For example, in addition to helping people see and find things that you do and share, we may use the information we receive about you ... for internal operations, including troubleshooting, data analysis, testing, research and service improvement." Do you agree that this policy does enough to count as informed consent? Discuss your reasoning.

Unequal Benefits. Researchers on depression proposed to investigate the effect of supplemental therapy and counseling on the quality of life of adults with depression. Eligible patients on the rolls of a large medical clinic were to be randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment group would be offered dental care, vision testing, transportation, and other services not available without charge to the control group. The review board felt that providing these services to some but not other persons in the same institution raised ethical questions. Do you agree? Explain your answer.

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. a. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. b. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only available for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. c. The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

Minimal Risk? You are a member of your college's institutional review board. You must decide whether several research proposals qualify for less rigorous review because they involve only minimal risk to subjects. Federal regulations say that "minimal risk" means the risks are no greater than "those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests." That's vague. Which of these do you think qualifies as "minimal risk"? a. Give subjects an experimental drug that may produce temporary dizziness as a side effect, and warn the subjects about this risk. b. Give subjects an experimental drug that may produce episodes of depression as a side effect. c. Recruit women for a study on physical abuse from spouses or partners by putting up posters in the surrounding community. The posters instruct any interested women who have experienced abuse to call the lab phone number and leave a message with their name and phone numbers. d. Recruit women for a study on physical abuse from spouses or partners by visiting shelters for victims of domestic violence and asking for volunteers. e. Asking women if they have had an abortion in a country where it is illegal. f. Asking women if they have had an abortion in a country in which it is legal but the issue is fraught with religious and political controversy.

Asking Teens about Vaping. A survey of more than 44,000 teenagers asked the subjects if they had used vaping devices in the past 12 months. In a follow-up question, subjects were asked what they vaped. Should consent of parents be required to ask minors about drug use and other such issues, or is consent of the minors themselves enough? Give reasons for your opinion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.