/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 If a distribution is skewed to t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If a distribution is skewed to the left, (a) the mean is less than the median. (b) the mean and median are equal. (c) the mean is greater than the median.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (a), the mean is less than the median, is correct.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Skewness

In statistics, when a distribution is skewed to the left, it has a longer tail on the left side. This means that a majority of the data values are concentrated on the right side of the distribution graph.
02

Relationship Between Mean and Median in Skewed Distributions

For distributions that are skewed to the left, the mean tends to be less than the median. This is because the mean is pulled towards the tail, which is on the left side, thereby decreasing its value compared to the median.
03

Choose the Correct Option

From the options given, we need to determine which one matches the characteristic of a left-skewed distribution. Since the mean is less than the median for this type of skewness, option (a) 'the mean is less than the median' is correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean and Median Relationship
In the realm of statistical analysis, the mean and median are two central measures of central tendency that help describe the characteristics of a distribution. The mean, often referred to as the average, is calculated by summing all data values and dividing by the number of values. It provides a numerical representation of a data set’s central location.

On the other hand, the median is the middle value that separates the higher half from the lower half of the data set. When examining data distributions, particularly skewed distributions, understanding the relationship between these two measures becomes crucial.

For a perfectly symmetrical distribution, the mean and median are equal. However, when the data is skewed, these measures diffuse. In a left-skewed distribution, the mean is typically less than the median, and in a right-skewed distribution, the mean is usually greater than the median. This discrepancy occurs because the mean is sensitive to outliers and elongated tails, while the median remains unaffected.
Left-Skewed Distribution
A left-skewed distribution, also known as negatively skewed, is characterized by its tail stretching more towards the left side of the graph. This elongation often occurs due to a few lower outliers creating the tail. The bulk of the data is piled up on the right side, near or above the median.

In practical scenarios, left-skew form can be visualized when examining things like exam scores of a difficult test, where only a few students score quite low compared to the rest. Because of the presence of lower values pulling the mean down, the mean in a left-skewed distribution will be positioned to the left of the median.

Some common features of left-skewed distributions include:
  • The mean is less than the median.
  • Most data values are on the higher side.
  • Possibility of outliers on the lower side.
Understanding these traits helps in making informed inferences about the nature of data and possible underlying causes.
Statistical Distributions
Statistical distributions provide a foundational concept in understanding how data is spread out across a range of values. They describe how frequencies of outcomes are distributed for a dataset and are illustrated in different shapes, such as normal, skewed, uniform, and more.

The most familiar distribution is the normal distribution, commonly known as the bell curve, where data is symmetrically distributed around the mean. However, not all data follows this pattern and may instead present skewness.

Distributions are termed skewed when they are not symmetrical. A **left-skewed distribution** has a longer tail on the left, while a **right-skewed distribution** has it on the right. Skewed distributions can affect statistical analyses, especially those relying on the mean as a measure of central tendency, highlighting the importance of considering distribution shape when interpreting data.

Statistical distributions are used to model real-world mechanisms across various fields such as economics, natural sciences, and engineering, aiding in predictions and decision-making processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Returns on stocks. How well have stocks done over the past generation? The Wilshire 5000 index describes the average performance of all U.S. stocks. The average is weighted by the total market value of each company's stock, so think of the index as measuring the performance of the average investor. Here are the percent returns on the Wilshire 5000 index for the years from 19712015: 22 ? WILSHIRE $$ \begin{array}{lc|cc|cc} \hline \text { Year } & \text { Return } & \text { Year } & \text { Return } & \text { Year } & \text { Return } \\ \hline 1971 & 17.68 & 1986 & 16.09 & 2001 & -10.97 \\ \hline 1972 & 17.98 & 1987 & 2.27 & 2002 & -20.86 \\ \hline 1973 & -18.52 & 1988 & 17.94 & 2003 & 31.64 \\ \hline 1974 & -28.39 & 1989 & 29.17 & 2004 & 12.62 \\ \hline 1975 & 38.47 & 1990 & -6.18 & 2005 & 6.32 \\ \hline 1976 & 26.59 & 1991 & 34.20 & 2006 & 15.88 \\ \hline 1977 & -2.64 & 1992 & 8.97 & 2007 & 5.73 \\ \hline 1978 & 9.27 & 1993 & 11.28 & 2008 & -37.34 \\ \hline 1979 & 25.56 & 1994 & -0.06 & 2009 & 29.42 \\ \hline 1980 & 33.67 & 1995 & 36.45 & 2010 & 17.87 \\ \hline 1981 & -3.75 & 1996 & 21.21 & 2011 & 0.59 \\ \hline 1982 & 18.71 & 1997 & 31.29 & 2012 & 16.12 \\ \hline & & & & & \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lc|cc|ll} 1983 & 23.47 & 1998 & 23.43 & 2013 & 34.02 \\ \hline 1984 & 3.05 & 1999 & 23.56 & 2014 & 12.07 \\ \hline 1985 & 32.56 & 2000 & -10.89 & 2015 & -0.24 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ What can you say about the distribution of yearly returns on stocks?

Shared Pain and Bonding. Although painful experiences are involved in social rituals in many parts of the world, little is known about the social effects of pain. Will sharing painful experiences in a small group lead to greater bonding of group members than sharing a similar non-painful experience? Fifty- four university students in South Wales were divided at random into a pain group containing 27 students, with the remaining students in the no-pain group. Pain was induced by two tasks. In the first task, students submerged their hands in freezing water for as long as possible, moving metal balls at the bottom of the vessel into a submerged container; in the second task, students performed a standing wall squat with back straight and knees at 90 degrees for as long as possible. The no-pain group completed the first task using room temperature water for 90 seconds and the second task by balancing on one foot for 60 seconds, changing feet if necessary. In both the pain and no-pain settings, the students completed the tasks in small groups, which typically consisted of four students and contained similar levels of group interaction. Afterward, each student completed a questionnaire to create a bonding score based on answers to questions such as "I feel the participants in this study have a lot in common," or "I feel I can trust the other participants." Here are the bonding scores for the two groups: \({ }^{8}\) all Bonding $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllllll} \hline \text { No-pain group: } & 3.43 & 4.86 & 1.71 & 1.71 & 3.86 & 3.14 & 4.14 & 3.14 & 4.43 & 3.71 \\ & 3.00 & 3.14 & 4.14 & 4.29 & 2.43 & 2.71 & 4.43 & 3.43 & 1.29 & 1.29 \\ & 3.00 & 3.00 & 2.86 & 2.14 & 4.71 & 1.00 & 3.71 & & & \\ \hline \text { Pain group: } & 4.71 & 4.86 & 4.14 & 1.29 & 2.29 & 4.43 & 3.57 & 4.43 & 3.57 & 3.43 \\ & 4.14 & 3.86 & 4.57 & 4.57 & 4.29 & 1.43 & 4.29 & 3.57 & 3.57 & 3.43 \\ & 2.29 & 4.00 & 4.43 & 4.71 & 4.71 & 2.14 & 3.57 & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Find the five-number summaries for the pain and the no-pain groups. (b) Construct a comparative boxplot for the two groups following the model of Figure 2.1. It doesn't matter if your boxplots are horizontal or vertical, but they should be drawn on the same set of axes. (c) Which group tends to have higher bonding scores? Is the variability in the two groups similar, or does one of the groups tend to have less variable bonding scores? Does either group contain one or more clear outliers?

Adolescent obesity. Adolescent obesity is a serious health risk affecting more than 5 million young people in the United States alone. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has the potential to provide a safe and effective treatment. Fifty adolescents between 14 and 18 years old with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 35 were recruited from the Melbourne, Australia, community for the study. \({ }^{19}\) Twenty-five were randomly selected to undergo gastric banding, and the remaining 25 were assigned to a super vised lifestyle intervention program involving diet, exercise, and behavior modification. All subjects were followed for two years. Here are the weight losses in kilograms for the subjects who completed the study: - In GASTRIC $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} \hline {}{}{\text { Gastric Banding }} \\ \hline 35.6 & 81.4 & 57.6 & 32.8 & 31.0 & 37.6 \\ \hline-36.5 & -5.4 & 27.9 & 49.0 & 64.8 & 39.0 \\ \hline 43.0 & 33.9 & 29.7 & 20.2 & 15.2 & 41.7 \\ \hline 53.4 & 13.4 & 24.8 & 19.4 & 32.3 & 22.0 \\ \hline {}{}{\text { Lifestyle Intervention }} \\ \hline 6.0 & 2.0 & -3.0 & 20.6 & 11.6 & 15.5 \\ \hline-17.0 & 1.4 & 4.0 & -4.6 & 15.8 & 34.6 \\ \hline 6.0 & -3.1 & -4.3 & -16.7 & -1.8 & -12.8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) In the context of this study, what do the negative values in the data set mean? (b) Give a graphical comparison of the weight loss distribution for both groups using side-by-side boxplots. Provide appropriate numerical summaries for the two distributions, and identify any high outliers in either group. What can you say about the effects of gastric banding versuslifestyle intervention on weight loss for the subjects in this study? (c) The measured variable was weight loss in kilograms. Would two subjects with the same weight loss always have similar benefits from a weightreduction program? Does it depend on their initial weights? Other variables considered in this study were the percent of excess weight lost and the reduction in BMI. Do you see any advantages to either of these variables when comparing weight loss for two groups? (d) One subject from the gastric-banding group dropped out of the study, and seven subjects from the lifestyle group dropped out. Of the seven dropouts in the lifestyle group, six had gained weight at the time they dropped out. If all subjects had completed the study, how do you think it would have affected the comparison between the two groups?

Maternal age at childbirth. How old are women when they have their first child? Here is the distribution of the age of the mother for all firstborn children in the United States in \(2014:^{17}\) $$ \begin{array}{lc|lc} \hline \text { Age } & \text { Count } & \text { Age } & \text { Count } \\ \hline 10-14 \text { years } & 2,769 & 30-34 \text { years } & 326,391 \\ \hline 15-19 \text { years } & 205,747 & 35-39 \text { years } & 114,972 \\ \hline 20-24 \text { years } & 445,523 & 40-44 \text { years } & 23,941 \\ \hline 25-29 \text { years } & 428,762 & 45-49 \text { years } & 2,169 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The number of firstbom children to mothers under 10 or over 50 years of age represent a negligible percentage of all first births and are not included in the table. (a) For comparison with other years and with other countries, we prefer a histogram of the percents in each age class rather than the counts. Explain why. (b) How many babies were there? (c) Make a histogram of the distribution, using percents on the vertical scale. Using this histogram, describe the distribution of the age at which women have their first child. (d) What are the locations of the median and quartiles in the ordered list of all maternal ages? In which age classes do the median and quartiles fall?

To make a boxplot of a distribution, you must know (a) all the individual observations. (b) the mean and the standard deviation. (c) the five-number summary.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.