/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 Returns on stocks. How well have... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Returns on stocks. How well have stocks done over the past generation? The Wilshire 5000 index describes the average performance of all U.S. stocks. The average is weighted by the total market value of each company's stock, so think of the index as measuring the performance of the average investor. Here are the percent returns on the Wilshire 5000 index for the years from 19712015: 22 ? WILSHIRE $$ \begin{array}{lc|cc|cc} \hline \text { Year } & \text { Return } & \text { Year } & \text { Return } & \text { Year } & \text { Return } \\ \hline 1971 & 17.68 & 1986 & 16.09 & 2001 & -10.97 \\ \hline 1972 & 17.98 & 1987 & 2.27 & 2002 & -20.86 \\ \hline 1973 & -18.52 & 1988 & 17.94 & 2003 & 31.64 \\ \hline 1974 & -28.39 & 1989 & 29.17 & 2004 & 12.62 \\ \hline 1975 & 38.47 & 1990 & -6.18 & 2005 & 6.32 \\ \hline 1976 & 26.59 & 1991 & 34.20 & 2006 & 15.88 \\ \hline 1977 & -2.64 & 1992 & 8.97 & 2007 & 5.73 \\ \hline 1978 & 9.27 & 1993 & 11.28 & 2008 & -37.34 \\ \hline 1979 & 25.56 & 1994 & -0.06 & 2009 & 29.42 \\ \hline 1980 & 33.67 & 1995 & 36.45 & 2010 & 17.87 \\ \hline 1981 & -3.75 & 1996 & 21.21 & 2011 & 0.59 \\ \hline 1982 & 18.71 & 1997 & 31.29 & 2012 & 16.12 \\ \hline & & & & & \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lc|cc|ll} 1983 & 23.47 & 1998 & 23.43 & 2013 & 34.02 \\ \hline 1984 & 3.05 & 1999 & 23.56 & 2014 & 12.07 \\ \hline 1985 & 32.56 & 2000 & -10.89 & 2015 & -0.24 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ What can you say about the distribution of yearly returns on stocks?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The distribution of returns shows an overall positive trend with high volatility and potential negative skewness due to significant downturns.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data

We have a list of the Wilshire 5000 index annual returns from the year 1971 to 2015. These returns range from significant negative values, such as -37.34% in 2008, to high positive values, like 38.47% in 1975. First, ensure all years and their corresponding returns are noted for analysis.
02

Calculate Summary Statistics

To understand the distribution, compute key summary statistics: 1. **Mean (Average) Return:** Sum all yearly returns and divide by the number of years (45 years). 2. **Median Return:** Arrange returns in order and find the middle value. 3. **Range of Returns:** Calculate the difference between the maximum and minimum values. 4. **Standard Deviation:** Measure how much each year's return deviates from the mean, indicating variability.
03

Analyze the Distribution Shape

Examine the skewness and make note of any outlier years. Returns vary widely, suggesting a spread with both high peaks and deep troughs, indicating potential skewness. Determine if extreme values (outliers) like 2008 with -37.34% or 1975 with 38.47% significantly affect the distribution.
04

Characterize the Distribution

Given the summary statistics and observed distribution shape, describe the pattern: - **Mean Return:** An average positive value, indicating general growth over time. - **Variability:** With high standard deviation, the volatility was substantial, showing years with both gains and losses. - **Asymmetrical Shape:** The distribution may be slightly skewed to the negative due to years like 2008 but high gains also suggest notable positive peaks.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wilshire 5000 Index
The Wilshire 5000 Index is a comprehensive barometer for the overall performance of the U.S. stock market. It includes all publicly traded U.S. stocks, providing a complete picture of the market's health. The index is weighted by each company's total market value. This means larger companies have a bigger impact on the index than smaller ones. It effectively reflects how the average investor might fare in the stock market because of its wide coverage.
A better understanding of the Wilshire 5000 Index helps investors see broad market trends rather than just focusing on individual stocks or sectors. It's like looking at the entire forest instead of just the trees.
Summary Statistics
Summary statistics are essential for a crisp grasp of stock returns. They simplify complex datasets into easier-to-understand metrics. When analyzing data like the Wilshire 5000 index returns, you should focus on key statistics such as the mean, median, range, and standard deviation.
  • **Mean Return:** This is the average of all yearly returns. It provides a general sense of how the market performs over time.
  • **Median Return:** This is the midpoint in a dataset, showing the middle value, which can sometimes present a more accurate picture than the mean, especially when data is skewed.
  • **Range:** This illustrates the spread between the highest and lowest returns, giving us insight into the market's volatility.
  • **Standard Deviation:** This measures the typical amount by which values differ from the mean, indicating overall volatility.

Utilizing these summary statistics provides a clear snapshot of trends and variations in stock market returns, helping investors make informed decisions.
Distribution Shape
Understanding the shape of the distribution of returns is crucial for grasping market dynamics. Essentially, the distribution shape tells us about the frequency and magnitude of stock returns variations over time. A look into the distribution of the Wilshire 5000 index returns can reveal skewness, whether left or right. This skewness indicates whether more returns were significantly lower or higher than the average.
  • If the distribution is skewed negatively, there will be more occurrences of returns below the average, suggesting that certain events led to sharp downward trends.
  • Conversely, a positive skew indicates more returns above average, reflecting periods of significant growth.

Years with extreme values, such as 2008 with -37.34% or 1975 with 38.47%, act as outliers. These can heavily influence the shape of the distribution, making it critical to consider them in any analysis. They show patterns of volatility and periods that defy average market behaviors.
Investing Trends
Examining investing trends over the years in the Wilshire 5000 index provides insight into how market conditions have developed and evolved. By understanding these trends, investors can make better-informed decisions about their future investment strategies.
Over decades, various trends emerge:
  • **Bull Markets:** Prolonged periods where the stock returns were consistently positive, indicating economic growth and investor confidence.
  • **Bear Markets:** Poor performance phases with negative returns, reflecting economic downturns or major financial crises.
  • **Volatile Periods:** Times with significant return fluctuations, highlighting instability and risk in the market.

Recognizing these patterns is crucial. It allows for the anticipation of potential future movements based on past events, though it's important to remember that historical trends do not guarantee future performances. Observing how the Wilshire 5000 behaved in different economic scenarios helps to contextualize new market developments.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Maternal age at childbirth. How old are women when they have their first child? Here is the distribution of the age of the mother for all firstborn children in the United States in \(2014:^{17}\) $$ \begin{array}{lc|lc} \hline \text { Age } & \text { Count } & \text { Age } & \text { Count } \\ \hline 10-14 \text { years } & 2,769 & 30-34 \text { years } & 326,391 \\ \hline 15-19 \text { years } & 205,747 & 35-39 \text { years } & 114,972 \\ \hline 20-24 \text { years } & 445,523 & 40-44 \text { years } & 23,941 \\ \hline 25-29 \text { years } & 428,762 & 45-49 \text { years } & 2,169 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The number of firstbom children to mothers under 10 or over 50 years of age represent a negligible percentage of all first births and are not included in the table. (a) For comparison with other years and with other countries, we prefer a histogram of the percents in each age class rather than the counts. Explain why. (b) How many babies were there? (c) Make a histogram of the distribution, using percents on the vertical scale. Using this histogram, describe the distribution of the age at which women have their first child. (d) What are the locations of the median and quartiles in the ordered list of all maternal ages? In which age classes do the median and quartiles fall?

The 2013-2014 roster of the Seattle Seahawks, winners of the 2014 NFL Super Bowl, included 10 defensive linemen and nine offensive linemen. The weights in pounds of the 10 defensive linemen were \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}311 & 254 & 297 & 260 & 323 & 242 & 300 & 252 & 303 & 274\end{array}\) The mean of these data is (a) \(281.60\). (b) \(282.50\). (c) \(285.50\).

Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Burning fuels in power plants and motor vehicles emits carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\), which contributes to global warming. The \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions (metric tons per capita) for countries varies from \(0.02\) in Burundi to \(44.02\) in Qatar. Although the data set includes 214 countries, the \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions of 15 countries are not available on the World Bank database. The data set is too large to print here, but here are the data for the first five countries: \({ }^{6}\) $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Country } & \mathbf{C O}_{2} \text { Emissions (Metric Tons per Capita) } \\ \hline \text { Aruba } & 23.92 \\ \hline \text { Andorra } & 5.97 \\ \hline \text { Afghanistan } & 0.43 \\ \hline \text { Angola } & 1.35 \\ \hline \text { Albania } & 1.61 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

You create the data. Create a set of seven numbers (repeats allowed) that have the five-number summary $$ \text { Minimum }=4 Q_{1}=8 \mathrm{M}=12 Q_{3}=15 \text { Maximum }=19 $$ There is more than one set of seven numbers with this five-number summary. What must be true about the seven numbers to have this five-number summary?

Adolescent obesity. Adolescent obesity is a serious health risk affecting more than 5 million young people in the United States alone. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has the potential to provide a safe and effective treatment. Fifty adolescents between 14 and 18 years old with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 35 were recruited from the Melbourne, Australia, community for the study. \({ }^{19}\) Twenty-five were randomly selected to undergo gastric banding, and the remaining 25 were assigned to a super vised lifestyle intervention program involving diet, exercise, and behavior modification. All subjects were followed for two years. Here are the weight losses in kilograms for the subjects who completed the study: - In GASTRIC $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} \hline {}{}{\text { Gastric Banding }} \\ \hline 35.6 & 81.4 & 57.6 & 32.8 & 31.0 & 37.6 \\ \hline-36.5 & -5.4 & 27.9 & 49.0 & 64.8 & 39.0 \\ \hline 43.0 & 33.9 & 29.7 & 20.2 & 15.2 & 41.7 \\ \hline 53.4 & 13.4 & 24.8 & 19.4 & 32.3 & 22.0 \\ \hline {}{}{\text { Lifestyle Intervention }} \\ \hline 6.0 & 2.0 & -3.0 & 20.6 & 11.6 & 15.5 \\ \hline-17.0 & 1.4 & 4.0 & -4.6 & 15.8 & 34.6 \\ \hline 6.0 & -3.1 & -4.3 & -16.7 & -1.8 & -12.8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) In the context of this study, what do the negative values in the data set mean? (b) Give a graphical comparison of the weight loss distribution for both groups using side-by-side boxplots. Provide appropriate numerical summaries for the two distributions, and identify any high outliers in either group. What can you say about the effects of gastric banding versuslifestyle intervention on weight loss for the subjects in this study? (c) The measured variable was weight loss in kilograms. Would two subjects with the same weight loss always have similar benefits from a weightreduction program? Does it depend on their initial weights? Other variables considered in this study were the percent of excess weight lost and the reduction in BMI. Do you see any advantages to either of these variables when comparing weight loss for two groups? (d) One subject from the gastric-banding group dropped out of the study, and seven subjects from the lifestyle group dropped out. Of the seven dropouts in the lifestyle group, six had gained weight at the time they dropped out. If all subjects had completed the study, how do you think it would have affected the comparison between the two groups?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.