/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Alpha again Environmentalists co... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Alpha again Environmentalists concerned about the impact of high-frequency radio transmissions on birds found that there was no evidence of a higher mortality rate among hatch lings in nests near cell towers. They based this conclusion on a test using \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Would they have made the same decision at \(\alpha=0.10 ?\) How about \(\alpha=0.01 ?\) Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Same conclusion at \(\alpha=0.10\) and \(\alpha=0.01\). No rejection of null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Alpha

Alpha (\(\alpha\)) is the significance level used in hypothesis testing to determine the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis.
02

Analyze the Initial Decision with Alpha=0.05

The environmentalists conducted a test with \(\alpha=0.05\) and found no evidence of higher mortality rates in nests near cell towers. This means the p-value of their test was greater than 0.05, leading them not to reject the null hypothesis.
03

Consider the Decision with a Higher Alpha Level (Alpha=0.10)

If they used \(\alpha=0.10\), a less strict significance level, the p-value would still have been greater than this threshold as it was greater than 0.05. So, they would still not reject the null hypothesis and reach the same conclusion: no evidence of higher mortality.
04

Analyze the Decision with a Lower Alpha Level (Alpha=0.01)

With \(\alpha=0.01\), the significance level is stricter. Since the environmentalists did not reject the null hypothesis at \(\alpha=0.05\), it implies the p-value would be greater than 0.01. Therefore, they would again not reject the null hypothesis, maintaining the conclusion of no evidence at \(\alpha=0.01\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
In statistics, the **significance level** is a critical concept in hypothesis testing. It is denoted by the Greek letter alpha (\(\alpha\)), and it sets the criterion for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. By choosing a significance level, you determine the probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, thus committing a Type I error.
Common significance levels include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. Choosing a significance level involves balancing the risk of a Type I error with the need to detect an effect if there is one.
  • **0.05**: Frequently used in many scientific studies. It implies a Type I error rate of 5%.
  • **0.01**: This is stricter and indicates a 1% chance of committing a Type I error, used when evidence needs to be more convincing.
  • **0.10**: This is less strict, with a 10% chance of Type I error, used in exploratory research.
    By understanding significance levels, researchers can make informed decisions about the reliability of their findings.
Type I Error
A **Type I error** happens when we reject the null hypothesis even though it is true. It's like a false positive. Imagine conducting a test that shows an effect or difference when there isn't one.
In hypothesis testing, the chance of making this mistake is linked directly to the significance level (\(\alpha\)). For example, if the alpha level is set at 0.05, there is a 5% risk of committing a Type I error. This risk is accepted in many research studies, assuming that 1 in 20 tests might incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis.
Ideally, researchers aim to minimize this risk, as it reflects accuracy in scientific conclusions. However, reducing this risk often requires larger sample sizes or more data, which might not always be feasible.
p-value
In hypothesis testing, the **p-value** helps us decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It tells us the probability of observing results as extreme as those in our sample, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. Consider these guidelines:
  • **p-value < significance level**: Reject the null hypothesis.
  • **p-value ≥ significance level**: Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
    The choice of significance level (such as 0.05) is crucial. If a test yields a p-value of 0.07:
    • At \(\alpha = 0.05\): Do not reject the null hypothesis.
    • At \(\alpha = 0.10\): You may reject the null hypothesis.
      Thus, the p-value's interpretation depends on the chosen significance level, impacting the final decision in hypothesis testing.
Null Hypothesis
The **null hypothesis** is a foundational aspect of hypothesis testing. It is a statement that suggests there is no effect or no difference, and it provides a basis for statistical testing.
Scientists use the null hypothesis as a starting point for analysis. The goal is to assess whether the observed data provide sufficient evidence to reject this hypothesis in favor of an alternative hypothesis.
The null hypothesis is typically expressed as:\[ H_0: \text{No effect or difference exists} \]This assumption is tested using data collected from experiments or observations.
By default, the null hypothesis is assumed true until evidence suggests otherwise. If our data give us a p-value less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we maintain it, concluding that our data have not provided strong enough evidence to dismiss it.
Understanding the null hypothesis is critical in studies and research as it determines the threshold for scientific conclusions and informs the design of experiments and the interpretation of results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Ads A company is willing to renew its advertising contract with a local radio station only if the station can prove that more than \(20 \%\) of the residents of the city have heard the ad and recognize the company's product. The radio station conducts a random phone survey of 400 people. a) What are the hypotheses? b) The station plans to conduct this test using a \(10 \%\) leve of significance, but the company wants the significance level lowered to \(5 \%\). Why? c) What is meant by the power of this test? d) For which level of significance will the power of this test be higher? Why? e) They finally agree to use \(\alpha=0.05,\) but the company proposes that the station call 600 people instead of the 400 initially proposed. Will that make the risk of Type II error higher or lower? Explain.

P-values Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a) A very high P-value is strong evidence that the null hypothesis is false. b) A very low \(P\) -value proves that the null hypothesis is false. c) A high P-value shows that the null hypothesis is true. d) A P-value below 0.05 is always considered sufficient evidence to reject a null hypothesis.

Errors For each of the following situations, state whether a Type I, a Type II, or neither error has been made. Explain briefly. a) A bank wants to see if the enrollment on their website is above \(30 \%\) based on a small sample of customers. It tests \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.3\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p>0.3\) and rejects the null hypothesis. Later the bank finds out that actually \(28 \%\) of all customers enrolled. b) A student tests 100 students to determine whether other students on her campus prefer Coke or Pepsi and finds no evidence that preference for Coke is not \(0.5 .\) Later, a marketing company tests all students on campus and finds no difference. c) A pharmaceutical company tests whether a drug lifts the headache relief rate from the \(25 \%\) achieved by the placebo. The test fails to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is 0.465. Further testing shows that the drug actually relieves headaches in \(38 \%\) of people.

Which alternative? In each of the following situations, is the alternative hypothesis one-sided or two-sided? What are the hypotheses? a) A college dining service conducts a survey to see if students prefer plastic or metal cutlery. b) In recent years, \(10 \%\) of college juniors have applied for study abroad. The dean's office conducts a survey to see if that's changed this year. c) A pharmaceutical company conducts a clinical trial to see if more patients who take a new drug experience headache relief than the \(22 \%\) who claimed relief after taking the placebo. d) At a small computer peripherals company, only \(60 \%\) of the hard drives produced passed all their performance tests the first time. Management recently invested a lot of resources into the production system and now conducts a test to see if it helped.

More errors For each of the following situations, state whether a Type I, a Type II, or neither error has been made. a) A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.8\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p<0.8\) fails to reject the null hypothesis. Later it is discovered that \(p=0.9\) b) A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.5\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p \neq 0.5\) rejects the null hypothesis. Later is it discovered that \(p=0.65\) c) A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.7\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p<0.7\) fails to reject the null hypothesis. Later is it discovered that \(p=0.6\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.