/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 85 Is it a good idea to listen to m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is it a good idea to listen to music when studying for a big test? In a study conducted by some statistics students, 62 people were randomly assigned to listen to rap music, music by Mozart, or no music while attempting to memorize objects pictured on a page. They were then asked to list all the objects they could remember. Here are summary statistics for each group: a. Does it appear that it is better to study while listening to Mozart than to rap music? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. b. Create a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference in memory score between students who study to Mozart and those who listen to no music at all. Interpret your interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The completion and interpretation of the hypothesis test will establish if it's better to study while listening to Mozart than to rap music. Depending on the obtained p-value, a conclusion will be reached on whether Mozart's music significantly improves memory scores. Furthermore, a \(90 \%\) confidence interval will estimate the range in which the true mean difference of memory scores (between studying while listening to Mozart as compared to no music) lies with \(90 \%\) confidence.

Step by step solution

01

Hypothesis Testing

To determine if it's better to study while listening to Mozart than to rap music, conduct a hypothesis test. Begin by establishing null and alternate hypotheses. The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): The mean memory score is the same for both Mozart's music and rap music. The Alternate Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): The mean memory score is higher for Mozart's music than for rap music. Then, use the given data to conduct a t-test.
02

Calculating t-statistic and p-value

Calculate the t-statistic and p-value using the data for both Mozart's and rap music groups. This involves the use of statistical formulas for t-test, taking into account the mean and standard deviation values for both the groups along with the sample size. A lower p-value indicates stronger evidence in favor of the alternate hypothesis.
03

Conclusion of Hypothesis Test

Based on the p-value, decide if the null hypothesis can be rejected at the chosen significance level (generally 0.05). If the p-value is less than the significance level, there is a significant difference in the memory scores favoring Mozart's music, and the null hypothesis is rejected. If not, do not reject the null hypothesis.
04

Confidence Interval Calculation

Construct a \(90\%\) confidence interval for the mean difference in memory score between students who study to Mozart and those who listen to no music at all. This involves calculating the mean difference between both groups, the combined standard deviation, and applying these in the confidence interval equation using a Z-score for \(90 \%\) confidence (1.645 for a one-tailed test).
05

Interpretation of Confidence Interval

Interpret the confidence interval. If the interval includes zero, there is no significant difference between studying with Mozart's music and with no music. If the range is above zero, it indicates studying with Mozart's music is beneficial. If it lies below zero, studying without music yields better results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A Confidence Interval (CI) is a statistical tool that estimates the range in which a population parameter lies, based on sample data. In this exercise, the CI is used to compare the mean memory scores of students who listen to Mozart against those who study in silence.

To construct a confidence interval for the mean difference, you will need:
  • Mean of each group
  • Standard deviation of each group
  • Sample sizes

The general formula for a confidence interval is: \[CI = \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \pm Z \left( \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \right)\]where \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) are the sample means, \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are the standard deviations, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes for each group, respectively. \( Z \) is the Z-score corresponding to the confidence level. For a 90% confidence interval, use a Z-score of approximately 1.645.

Interpreting the interval is key: if the interval includes zero, it suggests no significant difference between the two conditions. But if all values in the interval are above (or below) zero, it indicates a potential difference in effect.
Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is the statement we're trying to find evidence against. It suggests there's no effect or difference.

For this study, the null hypothesis proposes that the mean memory score of students listening to Mozart is equal to that of those listening to rap music:
  • \(H_0: \mu_{\text{Mozart}} = \mu_{\text{Rap}} \)

Accepting the null hypothesis implies that there's not enough statistical evidence to show that Mozart's music has any distinct effect on memory scores compared to rap.

However, if our test results yield a small p-value (typically less than 0.05), we may decide to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed data is unlikely under this assumption, suggesting a potential difference.
T-Test
The T-Test is a statistical test used to compare the means of two groups to determine if they are significantly different from each other. In our study on the effects of music on memory scores, the t-test helps assess whether students memorizing with Mozart have scores statistically different from those listening to rap music.

To perform a t-test, we calculate the t-statistic using:\[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}} \]where \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) are the means of the two groups, \( s_1^2 \) and \( s_2^2 \) are the variances, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are sample sizes.

Comparing the calculated t-value to a critical value from the t-distribution (based on significance level and degrees of freedom) tells you whether the difference in means is statistically significant.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a measure of whether an observed effect could have occurred by random chance.

In this context, if the difference in memory scores between those listening to Mozart and those listening to rap music is statistically significant, it suggests this difference is not due to random variability.
  • The p-value helps determine significance. It represents the probability of observing your results if the null hypothesis were true.
  • Traditionally, a p-value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Achieving statistical significance means you can be more confident that the music condition (Mozart vs. Rap) truly influences memory scores. However, it’s also important to consider the size of the effect—statistical significance doesn't always imply practical or meaningful differences in real-world terms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Journal of the American Medical Association reported a study examining the possible impact of air pollution caused by the \(9 / 11\) attack on New York's World Trade Center on the weight of babies. Researchers found that \(8 \%\) of 182 babies born to mothers who were exposed to heavy doses of soot and ash on September 11 were classified as having low birthweight. Only \(4 \%\) of 2300 babies born in another New York City hospital whose mothers had not been near the site of the disaster were similarly classified. Does this indicate a possibility that air pollution might be linked to a significantly higher proportion of low-weight babies? a. Test an appropriate hypothesis at \(\alpha=0.10\) and state your conclusion. b. If you concluded there is a difference, estimate that difference with a confidence interval and interpret that interval in context.

There has been debate among doctors over whether surgery can prolong life among men suffering from prostate cancer, a type of cancer that typically develops and spreads very slowly. Recently, The New England Journal of Medicine published results of some Scandinavian research. Men diagnosed with prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either undergo surgery or not. Among the 347 men who had surgery, 16 eventually died of prostate cancer, compared with 31 of the 348 men who did not have surgery. a. Was this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. b. Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of death for the two groups of men. c. Based on your confidence interval, is there evidence that surgery may be effective in preventing death from prostate cancer? Explain.

One month before the election, a poll of 630 randomly selected voters showed \(54 \%\) planning to vote for a certain candidate. A week later, it became known that he had had an extramarital affair, and a new poll showed only \(51 \%\) of 1010 voters supporting him. Do these results indicate a decrease in voter support for his candidacy? a. Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. b. If you concluded there was a difference, estimate that difference with a confidence interval and interpret your interval in context.

Researchers investigated how the size of a bowl affects how much ice cream people tend to scoop when serving themselves. \({ }^{12}\) At an "ice cream social," people were randomly given either a 17 -oz or a 34 -oz bowl (both large enough that they would not be filled to capacity). They were then invited to scoop as much ice cream as they liked. Did the bowl size change the selected portion size? Here are the summaries: 12Brian Wansink, Koert van Ittersum, and James E. Painter, "Ice Cream Illusions: Bowls, Spoons, and Self-Served Portion Sizes," Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006 . Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusions. For assumptions and conditions that you cannot test, you may assume that they are sufficiently satisfied to proceed.

A new vaccine was recently tested to see if it could prevent the painful and recurrent ear infections that many infants suffer from. The Lancet, a medical journal, reported a study in which babies about a year old were randomly divided into two groups. One group received vaccinations; the other did not. During the following year, only 333 of 2455 vaccinated children had ear infections, compared to 499 of 2452 unvaccinated children in the control group. a. Are the conditions for inference satisfied? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of ear infection. c. Use your confidence interval to explain whether you think the vaccine is effective.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.