/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 Researchers comparing the effect... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Researchers comparing the effectiveness of two pain medications randomly selected a group of patients who had been complaining of a certain kind of joint pain. They randomly divided these people into two groups, then administered the pain killers. Of the 112 people in the group who received medication A, 84 said this pain reliever was effective. Of the 108 people in the other group, 66 reported that pain reliever B was effective. a. Write a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the percent of people who may get relief from this kind of joint pain by using medication A. Interpret your interval. b. Write a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the percent of people who may get relief by using medication B. Interpret your interval. c. Do the intervals for \(A\) and B overlap? What do you think this means about the comparative effectiveness of these medications? d. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of people who may find these medications effective. Interpret your interval. e. Does this interval contain zero? What does that mean? f. Why do the results in parts \(c\) and e seem contradictory? If we want to compare the effectiveness of these two pain relievers, which is the correct approach? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Medication A and B do not significantly differ in effectiveness according to the comparison of confidence intervals as they overlap. However, the 95% confidence interval for the difference does not contain zero, suggesting a significant difference in effectiveness. This apparent contradiction can be resolved by noting that the latter method is more appropriate for this comparison as it directly measures the difference in effectiveness.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Confidence Interval for Medication A

First, calculate the proportion of people who reported that Medication A was effective, this is \( p_A = 84/112 = 0.75 \). Then, calculate the standard error of proportion using the formula \(SE = \sqrt{ p_A (1 - p_A) / n_A }\) where \( p_A\) is the proportion of success, \( n_A = 112\) is the total number of participants. The 95% confidence interval is given by \( p_A \pm 1.96*SE \). Plug in the values to get the confidence interval.
02

Calculate Confidence Interval for Medication B

Calculate the proportion of people who reported that Medication B was effective, this is \( p_B = 66 / 108 = 0.611 \). Then, calculate the standard error as above but use \( p_B\) and \(n_B = 108\). The 95% confidence interval for B is given by \( p_B \pm 1.96*SE \). Plug in the numbers to get the confidence interval.
03

Compare the Confidence Intervals

Check if the confidence intervals for A and B overlap. If they do, this suggests that there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of the two medications.
04

Calculate confidence interval for the difference in effect

Calculate the difference in proportions \( d = p_A - p_B \) and the standard error of the difference \( SE = \sqrt{SE_A^2 + SE_B^2}\). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is given by \( d \pm 1.96*SE \). Plug in the values to get the confidence interval.
05

Check if the interval contains zero

If the confidence interval for the difference includes zero, it suggests that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two medications.
06

Resolve the apparent contradiction

The apparent contradiction between steps 3 and 5 may be due to different assumptions underlying the two methods. The appropriate method to use when comparing the effectiveness of two treatments depends on the research question and the nature of the data. Here, the difference in proportions is more appropriate as it directly measures the difference in effectiveness.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Comparison
When comparing two different treatments or groups, it's essential to evaluate the proportion of success or effectiveness in each. In our exercise with pain medications A and B, we determine how many participants found each medication effective. To find the proportion, we take the number of successful outcomes (patients who found relief) and divide it by the total number of participants in each group. For example, if 84 out of 112 people said medication A worked for them, the proportion is \[ p_A = \frac{84}{112} = 0.75. \] Similarly, for medication B, if 66 out of 108 people found it effective, the proportion is \[ p_B = \frac{66}{108} = 0.611. \] Understanding these proportions is the first step in comparing the effectiveness of two different treatments.
Standard Error
The standard error gives us an idea of how much variability we can expect in our sample proportions due to random sampling error. It helps us assess the reliability of our sample estimates.To calculate the standard error for a proportion, we use the formula: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}, \] where \( p \) is the sample proportion, and \( n \) is the sample size. The smaller the standard error, the more reliable the estimate of the proportion.For medication A, the calculation is:\[ SE_A = \sqrt{\frac{0.75 \times (1 - 0.75)}{112}}. \]For medication B, it is:\[ SE_B = \sqrt{\frac{0.611 \times (1 - 0.611)}{108}}. \]These standard errors are crucial for constructing confidence intervals, which provide a range of possible values for the true proportions in the population.
95% Confidence Level
A confidence interval gives us a range of values within which we expect the true population parameter to lie, with a certain degree of confidence. Here, we're focusing on a 95% confidence level, meaning we are 95% sure that the true proportion of people who find relief from the medication falls within our interval.To calculate a 95% confidence interval, we take the sample proportion \( p \), and use the formula: \[ p \pm 1.96 \times SE, \] where \( 1.96 \) is the z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level. Applying it to medication A:The confidence interval is: \[ 0.75 \pm 1.96 \times SE_A. \]And for medication B:\[ 0.611 \pm 1.96 \times SE_B. \]These intervals help us understand the effectiveness range for each medication based on our sample data.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps us determine whether the observed difference between two groups is likely due to chance or reflects a genuine difference in the population. When comparing two proportions, like those of medications A and B, we are interested in whether the difference is statistically significant.Firstly, we calculate the difference between the two proportions: \[ d = p_A - p_B. \]Then, we compute the standard error for this difference: \[ SE_d = \sqrt{SE_A^2 + SE_B^2}. \]Next, we create a confidence interval for the difference:\[ d \pm 1.96 \times SE_d. \]If this interval includes zero, it indicates that there is no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the two medications. This means that any observed difference in proportions may just be due to random sampling error. Understanding significance is key in determining whether one medication can be confidently considered more effective than the other.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do people who work for non-profit organizations differ from those who work at for-profit companies when it comes to personal job satisfaction? Separate random samples were collected by a polling agency to investigate the difference. Data collected from 422 employees at non-profit organizations revealed that 377 of them were "highly satisfied." From the for-profit companies, 431 out 518 employees reported the same level of satisfaction. Find the standard error of the difference in sample proportions.

Suppose an advocacy organization surveys 960 Canadians and 192 of them reported being born in another country (www.unitednorthamerica.org/simdiff.htm). Similarly, 170 out of 1250 U.S. citizens reported being foreign-born. Find the standard error of the difference in sample proportions.

There has been debate among doctors over whether surgery can prolong life among men suffering from prostate cancer, a type of cancer that typically develops and spreads very slowly. Recently, The New England Journal of Medicine published results of some Scandinavian research. Men diagnosed with prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either undergo surgery or not. Among the 347 men who had surgery, 16 eventually died of prostate cancer, compared with 31 of the 348 men who did not have surgery. a. Was this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. b. Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of death for the two groups of men. c. Based on your confidence interval, is there evidence that surgery may be effective in preventing death from prostate cancer? Explain.

In Exercise 53 , we saw a \(90 \%\) confidence interval of (-6.5,-1.4) grams for \(\mu_{\text {Meat }}-\mu_{\text {Beef }}\) the difference in mean fat content for meat vs. all-beef hot dogs. Explain why you think each of the following statements is true or false: a. If I eat a meat hot dog instead of a beef dog, there's a \(90 \%\) chance I'll consume less fat. b. \(90 \%\) of meat hot dogs have between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than a beef hot dog. c. I'm \(90 \%\) confident that meat hot dogs average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. d. If I were to get more samples of both kinds of hot dogs, \(90 \%\) of the time the meat hot dogs would average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. e. If I tested more samples, l'd expect about \(90 \%\) of the resulting confidence intervals to include the true difference in mean fat content between the two kinds of hot dogs.

Researchers investigated how the size of a bowl affects how much ice cream people tend to scoop when serving themselves. \({ }^{12}\) At an "ice cream social," people were randomly given either a 17 -oz or a 34 -oz bowl (both large enough that they would not be filled to capacity). They were then invited to scoop as much ice cream as they liked. Did the bowl size change the selected portion size? Here are the summaries: 12Brian Wansink, Koert van Ittersum, and James E. Painter, "Ice Cream Illusions: Bowls, Spoons, and Self-Served Portion Sizes," Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006 . Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusions. For assumptions and conditions that you cannot test, you may assume that they are sufficiently satisfied to proceed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.