/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 The Consumer Reports article des... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Consumer Reports article described in Exercise 51 also listed the fat content (in grams) for samples of beef and meat hot dogs. The resulting \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{M e a t}-\mu_{B e e f}\) is (-6.5,-1.4) a. The endpoints of this confidence interval are negative numbers. What does that indicate? b. What does the fact that the confidence interval does not contain 0 indicate? c. If we use this confidence interval to test the hypothesis that \(\mu_{M e a t}-\mu_{B e e f}=0\) what's the corresponding alpha level?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The negative confidence interval suggests beef hot dogs have higher fat content on average than meat ones. b. Zero not being in the interval confirms a significant difference between the two means, here implying significantly different fat contents in the two types of hot dogs. c. The alpha level in this case is 0.10 or 10%.

Step by step solution

01

Interpretation of negative confidence interval

The confidence interval (-6.5,-1.4) means that we are 90% confident that the true mean difference between the fat content of meat and beef hot dogs falls within this range. The negative values indicate that on average, beef hot dogs have higher fat content compared to meat hot dogs. The true mean difference of fat content in the population is somewhere between 1.4 to 6.5 grams less in meat hot dogs than in beef hot dogs.
02

Implications of zero not being in the confidence interval

If a confidence interval for the difference between two means does not include 0, it suggests that there is a statistically significant difference between the two population means. Here, since 0 is not in the interval, it asserts that the mean fat content of beef hot dogs is significantly different from that of meat hot dogs.
03

Identifying the alpha level

Since we are dealing with a 90% confidence interval, the remaining 10% represents areas where the true mean could fall outside the confidence interval, defining our significance level. This 10% is split between two tails of the distribution (5% in each tail), so the alpha level here is 0.10 or 10%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
The term 'statistical significance' is a cornerstone of hypothesis testing. It refers to the likelihood that the difference observed between two groups is not due to random chance. When we say a result is statistically significant, it means that we are reasonably confident that the observed effect actually exists in the population, rather than being a fluke occurrence in our sample.

In the context of the given exercise, the confidence interval for the mean difference in fat content between meat and beef hot dogs does not contain zero. This exclusion of zero from the interval is taken as strong evidence that there is a statistically significant difference between the two population means. Essentially, it would be very unlikely for the true mean difference to be zero – in other words, there's a significant difference in fat content between the types of hot dogs.

Statistical significance is often determined using a p-value or an alpha level (the significance level). If the p-value is less than the chosen alpha level (commonly 0.05), the difference is deemed statistically significant. In this exercise, the corresponding alpha level for the confidence interval is 0.10, implying a less stringent cutting off point for significance compared to the more customary 0.05.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a systematic process used in statistics to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition holds for the entire population. It begins with the formulation of two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (ull_hypothesis_text) and the alternative hypothesis (ull_hypothesis_text).

The null hypothesis is a statement of no effect or no difference, and it is what we assume to be true until the data provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. The latter represents the outcome the researcher aims to support, suggesting a significant effect or difference.

The confidence interval from the exercise is employed in hypothesis testing to decide if we can reject the null hypothesis that there's no difference in mean fat content between the two types of hot dogs (ull_hypothesis_text). Because the interval does not include zero, the null hypothesis is rejected, and there is support for the alternative hypothesis that the true mean difference in fat content between meat and beef hot dogs is not equal to zero (ull_hypothesis_text).
Mean Difference
Mean difference is a measure used to compare the averages (means) between two groups to identify whether there is a significant difference in their data. In the context of our exercise, the variable of interest is the fat content in grams of meat vs. beef hot dogs.

With the given 90% confidence interval for the mean difference (ull_hypothesis_text), we interpret that the average fat content for meat hot dogs is between 1.4 to 6.5 grams less than that of beef hot dogs. This does not simply depict a comparison between two sample means but rather gives a range within which the true mean difference lies with a 90% level of confidence.

Understanding the mean difference is critical because it provides insight into the magnitude and direction of the difference. The negative sign here indicates that, on average, the fat content is lower for meat hot dogs than for beef hot dogs. Analyzing the mean difference helps researchers and decision-makers to assess the practical significance of their findings.
Population Means
Population means refer to the average values of a particular variable or characteristic for an entire population. It is what we try to estimate or draw inferences about in statistical analysis, using the sample data at hand. Since it is usually unfeasible to collect data from every individual in a population, we rely on sample means to make educated guesses about the population means.

In hypothesis testing and when calculating confidence intervals, the objective is to infer about the population means from the sample means. For example, in our exercise, although we only have the mean fat content of a sample of meat and beef hot dogs, we are making statements about the average difference in fat content for all meat and beef hot dogs. The confidence interval provides a range that we are confident includes the true difference between the population means.

It is crucial to understand that any estimations we make using sample data are subject to uncertainty, which is captured by the confidence interval. By stating that we are 90% confident, we're saying there is a 10% chance the true mean difference lies outside the provided confidence interval, thus acknowledging the element of uncertainty in our estimate.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A consumer magazine plans to poll car owners to see if they are happy enough with their vehicles that they would purchase the same model again. They'll randomly select 450 owners of American-made cars and 450 owners of Japanese models. Obviously, the actual opinions of the entire population couldn't be known, but suppose \(76 \%\) of owners of American cars and \(78 \%\) of owners of Japanese cars would purchase another. a. What kind of sampling design is the magazine planning to use? b. What difference would you expect their poll to show? c. Of course, sampling error means the poll won't reflect the difference perfectly. What's the standard deviation for the difference in the proportions? d. Sketch a sampling model for the difference in proportions that might appear in a poll like this. e. Could the magazine be misled by the poll, concluding that owners of American cars are much happier with their vehicles than owners of Japanese cars? Explain.

A new vaccine was recently tested to see if it could prevent the painful and recurrent ear infections that many infants suffer from. The Lancet, a medical journal, reported a study in which babies about a year old were randomly divided into two groups. One group received vaccinations; the other did not. During the following year, only 333 of 2455 vaccinated children had ear infections, compared to 499 of 2452 unvaccinated children in the control group. a. Are the conditions for inference satisfied? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of ear infection. c. Use your confidence interval to explain whether you think the vaccine is effective.

Researchers at the National Cancer Institute released the results of a study that investigated the effect of weed-killing herbicides on house pets. They examined 827 dogs from homes where an herbicide was used on a regular basis, diagnosing malignant lymphoma in 473 of them. Of the 130 dogs from homes where no herbicides were used, only 19 were found to have lymphoma. a. What's the standard error of the difference in the two proportions? b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for this difference. c. State an appropriate conclusion.

Researchers investigated how the size of a bowl affects how much ice cream people tend to scoop when serving themselves. \({ }^{12}\) At an "ice cream social," people were randomly given either a 17 -oz or a 34 -oz bowl (both large enough that they would not be filled to capacity). They were then invited to scoop as much ice cream as they liked. Did the bowl size change the selected portion size? Here are the summaries: 12Brian Wansink, Koert van Ittersum, and James E. Painter, "Ice Cream Illusions: Bowls, Spoons, and Self-Served Portion Sizes," Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006 . Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusions. For assumptions and conditions that you cannot test, you may assume that they are sufficiently satisfied to proceed.

A man who moves to a new city sees that there are two routes he could take to work. A neighbor who has lived there a long time tells him Route A will average 5 minutes faster than Route B. The man decides to experiment. Each day, he flips a coin to determine which way to go, driving each route 20 days. He finds that Route A takes an average of 40 minutes, with standard deviation 3 minutes, and Route B takes an average of 43 minutes, with standard deviation 2 minutes. Histograms of travel times for the routes are roughly symmetric and show no outliers. a. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in average commuting time for the two routes. (From technology, \(d f=33.1 .)\) b. Should the man believe the old-timer's claim that he can save an average of 5 minutes a day by always driving Route A? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.