/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 The Centers for Disease Control ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported a survey of randomly selected Americans age 65 and older, which found that 411 of 1012 men and 535 of 1062 women suffered from some form of arthritis. a. Are the assumptions and conditions necessary for inference satisfied? Explain. b. Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of senior men and women who have this disease. c. Interpret your interval in this context. d. Does this confidence interval suggest that arthritis is more likely to afflict women than men? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answers depend on the calculated values for proportions and the confidence interval. Step 3 will yield the numeric answer for the interval, which can be interpreted (Step 4) and used to compare the proportions (Step 5).

Step by step solution

01

Check Assumptions

The assumptions for a two-proportion z-test include: (1) the samples must be independent, (2) the sampling method for each population is simple random sampling, and (3) the counts of successes and failures in each sample are both at least 10. Here, the samples are assumed to be independent and randomly chosen. The number of successes and failure (both men and women with and without arthritis) are all larger than 10.
02

Calculate The Proportions

Calculate the proportions of men and women who suffered from arthritis: \(p_m = \frac{411}{1012}\) for men and \(p_w = \frac{535}{1062}\) for women.
03

Compute The Confidence Interval

Now calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions. We apply the formula for the confidence interval for the difference of two proportions: \[CI = (p_w - p_m) \pm z*SE\] where \(SE = \sqrt{(\frac{p_m(1 - p_m)}{n_m}) + (\frac{p_w(1 - p_w)}{n_w})}\) is the standard error of the difference, \(n_m\) and \(n_w\) represent the number of men and women in the samples respectively, and \(z\) corresponds to the z-value from the standard normal distribution for a 95% confidence interval, which is approximately 1.96.
04

Interpret The Interval

Depending on the confidence interval calculated, we need to interpret it in the context of the problem. If the interval does not contain 0, that means the proportions are significantly different, suggesting that men and women have different rates of arthritis.
05

Compare Proportions

To answer the question whether arthritis is more likely to afflict women than men, we need to see if the confidence interval is entirely positive. If so, it suggests that women have significantly higher rates of arthritis than men.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-proportion z-test
The two-proportion z-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the proportions of two groups or populations. This test is especially useful when analyzing categorical data from two separate samples. The main goal here is to compare the proportions to see if they are equal or if there's a significant difference between them.

To conduct a two-proportion z-test, certain assumptions must be met:
  • The samples must be independent, meaning the selection of one sample doesn't influence the other.
  • The sampling method for each population should be simple random sampling to ensure representative samples.
  • Both samples must be large enough so that the count of successes and failures in each sample is at least 10.
In our exercise, these conditions are satisfied, allowing us to proceed with the z-test confidently.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we expect the true difference in proportions to fall. It is crucial because it offers a degree of certainty about our estimate. In general, a confidence interval is expressed with a percentage, such as 95%, indicating that we expect 95% of such intervals to contain the true parameter.

For the difference in proportions, the confidence interval is calculated using the formula:
\[CI = (p_w - p_m) \pm z*SE\]
where \(p_w\) and \(p_m\) are the proportions of women and men who have arthritis, respectively, \(z\) is the z-value for the desired confidence level (approximately 1.96 for 95%), and \(SE\) is the standard error of the difference between the two proportions.

By calculating the confidence interval, you can determine a range that likely contains the true difference between the two groups. This understanding helps inform decisions and interpretations, like determining if women suffer more from arthritis than men.
Difference in Proportions
The difference in proportions is a measure that helps quantify how much one group's proportion differs from another's. It's calculated simply as the proportion of interest in one group minus the proportion of interest in the other. In the context of our arthritis example, this would be \(p_w - p_m\), where \(p_w\) is the proportion of women with arthritis, and \(p_m\) is the proportion of men with arthritis.

Interpreting this difference is straightforward:
  • If the difference is positive, it suggests that more women than men have arthritis.
  • If the difference is negative, it implies more men than women have arthritis.
  • If the difference is zero or very close to zero, it indicates similar proportions.
The concept of difference in proportions is powerful as it directly points to the direction and magnitude of disparity between two populations, guiding further analysis or health interventions.
Sample Assumptions
Sample assumptions are the foundational requirements that ensure the validity of statistical tests and constructs, like the two-proportion z-test or confidence intervals. If these assumptions are violated, the results can be misleading in terms of precision and accuracy.

In our case, the critical assumptions include:
  • Independence of samples: The results from each sample (men and women) should not affect each other.
  • Random sampling: Each group should be a representative random sample to generalize findings effectively.
  • Sufficient sample size: To achieve accurate estimates, there should be at least 10 successes and 10 failures in each subgroup.
Maintaining these assumptions helps improve the reliability of the statistical conclusions drawn, like understanding whether arthritis rates significantly differ between elderly men and women.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is it a good idea to listen to music when studying for a big test? In a study conducted by some statistics students, 62 people were randomly assigned to listen to rap music, music by Mozart, or no music while attempting to memorize objects pictured on a page. They were then asked to list all the objects they could remember. Here are summary statistics for each group: a. Does it appear that it is better to study while listening to Mozart than to rap music? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. b. Create a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference in memory score between students who study to Mozart and those who listen to no music at all. Interpret your interval.

Do people who work for non-profit organizations differ from those who work at for-profit companies when it comes to personal job satisfaction? Separate random samples were collected by a polling agency to investigate the difference. Data collected from 422 employees at non-profit organizations revealed that 377 of them were "highly satisfied." From the for-profit companies, 431 out 518 employees reported the same level of satisfaction. Find the standard error of the difference in sample proportions.

One month before the election, a poll of 630 randomly selected voters showed \(54 \%\) planning to vote for a certain candidate. A week later, it became known that he had had an extramarital affair, and a new poll showed only \(51 \%\) of 1010 voters supporting him. Do these results indicate a decrease in voter support for his candidacy? a. Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. b. If you concluded there was a difference, estimate that difference with a confidence interval and interpret your interval in context.

In Exercise 53 , we saw a \(90 \%\) confidence interval of (-6.5,-1.4) grams for \(\mu_{\text {Meat }}-\mu_{\text {Beef }}\) the difference in mean fat content for meat vs. all-beef hot dogs. Explain why you think each of the following statements is true or false: a. If I eat a meat hot dog instead of a beef dog, there's a \(90 \%\) chance I'll consume less fat. b. \(90 \%\) of meat hot dogs have between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than a beef hot dog. c. I'm \(90 \%\) confident that meat hot dogs average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. d. If I were to get more samples of both kinds of hot dogs, \(90 \%\) of the time the meat hot dogs would average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. e. If I tested more samples, l'd expect about \(90 \%\) of the resulting confidence intervals to include the true difference in mean fat content between the two kinds of hot dogs.

Egyptians Some archaeologists theorize that ancient Egyptians interbred with several different immigrant populations over thousands of years. To see if there is any indication of changes in body structure that might have resulted, they measured 30 skulls of male Egyptians dated from 4000 B.c.E. and 30 others dated from 200 B.C.E. (A. Thomson and R. Randall-Maciver, Ancient Races of the Thebaid, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1905\()\) a) Are these data appropriate for inference? Explain. b) Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean skull breadth between these two eras. c) Do these data provide evidence that the mean breadth of males' skulls changed over this period? Explain. d) Perform Tukey's test for the difference. Do your conclusions of part c change? \({ }^{*}\) e) Perform a rank sum test for the difference. Do your conclusions of part c change?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.