/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 You are a consultant to the mark... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

You are a consultant to the marketing department of a business preparing to launch an ad campaign for a new product. The company can afford to run ads during one TV show, and has decided not to sponsor a show with sexual content. You read the study described in Exercise 75 , then use a computer to create a confidence interval for the difference in mean number of brand names remembered between the groups watching violent shows and those watching neutral shows. TWO-SAMPLET \(95 \%\) CI FOR MUviol - MUneut : (-1.578,-0.602) a. At the meeting of the marketing staff, you have to explain what this output means. What will you say? b. What advice would you give the company about the upcoming ad campaign?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The result implies people watching violent shows remember between 0.602 and 1.578 fewer brand names than people watching neutral ones. Therefore, the ad campaign should run during a neutral show.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Confidence Interval

A 95% confidence interval means that 95 out of 100 times, the actual mean difference will lie within this interval. In our case, the confidence interval is (-1.578, -0.602), implying that on average, fewer brands are remembered when the viewer watches violent shows as compared to neutral shows.
02

Interpret the Result

You'll say that the output means people watching violent shows remember between 0.602 and 1.578 fewer brand names than people watching neutral shows, with a 95% level of confidence. This signifies that, statistically, violent content has a negative impact on viewers' ability to remember brand names.
03

Advising the Company

Based on the result, it would be advisable to run the ad campaign during a neutral show rather a violent one. The ability to remember brands appears significantly diminished in the violent show setting, which may affect the impact of the company's ad campaign.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-Sample T-Test
A Two-Sample T-Test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two independent groups. It is especially useful in scenarios where you want to compare two different conditions or settings.
The test begins by assuming that there is no difference between the two groups, referred to as the null hypothesis. When conducting a Two-Sample T-Test, you collect samples from two groups and calculate the means. Then, by using the test, you determine if the difference in these means is larger than what you would expect by random chance.
In the exercise's context, the test compares the number of brand names remembered by viewers watching violent shows versus neutral shows. A significant result indicates that the environment in which the show is set can influence memory retention of brands, as suggested by the confidence interval provided in the solution.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a key concept when interpreting the results of a test, such as a Two-Sample T-Test. It refers to the likelihood that the result you observe is not due to chance. This significance is often measured against a threshold called the significance level (alpha), typically set at 0.05 (5%).
When the p-value obtained from the test is less than the alpha level, the result is considered statistically significant. This suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
In the given solution, the confidence interval does not contain 0, implying that the difference is statistically significant. People remember fewer brand names during violent shows compared to neutral ones, providing a solid foundation for making informed marketing decisions.
Ad Campaign Strategy
Formulating an effective ad campaign strategy hinges on understanding key findings from research and statistical tests. The Two-Sample T-Test results and the confidence interval provided indicate that fewer brand names are remembered during violent shows than neutral ones. This insight is crucial for strategy development.
When planning ad placements, it is important to maximize brand recall. Thus, based on the statistical evidence, running ads during neutral shows is advantageous as they have a more positive impact on brand recall. This approach aligns with efforts to enhance the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
Additionally, understanding the audience's media consumption habits and tailoring the content to fit non-violent settings can further bolster campaign success. This strategic approach maximizes audience engagement and increases the likelihood of achieving desired marketing outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A new vaccine was recently tested to see if it could prevent the painful and recurrent ear infections that many infants suffer from. The Lancet, a medical journal, reported a study in which babies about a year old were randomly divided into two groups. One group received vaccinations; the other did not. During the following year, only 333 of 2455 vaccinated children had ear infections, compared to 499 of 2452 unvaccinated children in the control group. a. Are the conditions for inference satisfied? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of ear infection. c. Use your confidence interval to explain whether you think the vaccine is effective.

The global survey we learned about in Exercise 49 also asked respondents how they felt about the statement "I try to avoid eating fast foods." The random sample of 800 included 411 people 35 years old or younger, and of those, 197 agreed (completely or somewhat) with the statement. Of the 389 people over 35 years old, 246 people agreed with the statement. Is there evidence that the percentage of people avoiding fast food is different in the two age groups?

Political pundits talk about the "bounce" that a presidential candidate gets after his party's convention. In the past 40 years, it has averaged about 6 percentage points. Just before the 2004 Democratic convention, Rasmussen Reports polled 1500 likely voters at random and found that \(47 \%\) favored John Kerry. Just afterward, they took another random sample of 1500 likely voters and found that \(49 \%\) favored Kerry. That's a two percentage point increase, but the pollsters claimed that there was no bounce. Explain.

In Chapter 6 , Exercise 25 , we looked at collected samples of water from streams in the Adirondack Mountains to investigate the effects of acid rain. Researchers measured the pH (acidity) of the water and classified the streams with respect to the kind of substrate (type of rock over which they flow). A lower pH means the water is more acidic. Here is a boxplot of the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the streams by substrate (limestone, mixed, or shale): Here are selected parts of a software analysis comparing the pH of streams with limestone and shale substrates: 2 -Sample \(t\) -Test of \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) Difference Between Means \(=0.735\) \(t\) -Statistic \(=16.30 \mathrm{w} / 133 \mathrm{df}\) \(\mathrm{p} \leq 0.0001\) a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for this test. b. From the information you have, do the assumptions and conditions appear to be met? c. What conclusion would you draw?

Do people who work for non-profit organizations differ from those who work at for-profit companies when it comes to personal job satisfaction? Separate random samples were collected by a polling agency to investigate the difference. Data collected from 422 employees at non-profit organizations revealed that 377 of them were "highly satisfied." From the for-profit companies, 431 out 518 employees reported the same level of satisfaction. Find the standard error of the difference in sample proportions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.