/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 In September \(2013,\) the Pew I... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In September \(2013,\) the Pew Internet and American Life Project surveyed American adults on their Facebook use. It found that \(64 \%\) visited the site on a daily basis, up from \(51 \%\) in \(2010 .\) What does it mean to say that the difference in proportions is "significant"?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Saying that the difference in proportions is 'significant' means that it's unlikely the observed increase in daily Facebook usage from \(51\%\) in \(2010\) to \(64\%\) in \(2013\) happened by chance. Instead, this indicates a real trend or effect, implying an actual increase in daily Facebook usage among American adults.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Significant

In statistics, 'significant' often means that the results obtained from a sample are unlikely to have occurred purely by chance. It indicates that there is enough evidence to suggest that a certain effect or phenomenon is present.
02

Discussing the context

Here, the proportion of American adults visiting Facebook daily increased from \(51\%\) in \(2010\) to \(64\%\) in \(2013\). The term 'significant' in this case would typically mean that a statistical test has been done, and the likelihood of seeing a difference this large purely by chance is low.
03

Interpretation of Statistical Significance

So, if the difference in proportions is 'significant', it suggests that the increase in daily Facebook usage is not just a random fluctuation. It is a real increase that would be very unlikely to see if the proportions were the same in \(2010\) and \(2013\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Difference in Proportions
When we talk about the "difference in proportions," we're interested in comparing two groups' percentage of an event or characteristic. In this exercise, you see that the focus is on the percentage of American adults visiting Facebook daily in 2010 and 2013. Proportions are seen as ratios. They can be expressed as percentages or fractions.
  • The proportion in 2010 was 51%.
  • The proportion in 2013 was 64%.
The difference in proportions is simply the subtraction of these two numbers: 64% - 51%, which equals 13%.
This 13% difference is what we're analyzing statistically to understand if it's significant or just due to random chance. It's not just about the numbers, rather what they mean in a larger context that’s important.
Statistical Test
A statistical test is a formal method that helps us decide whether a significant change or effect exists between two groups. When comparing the proportions of Facebook users between 2010 and 2013, we would utilize a statistical test to tell us if the observed change is meaningful enough to conclude an actual trend.
Statistical tests hinge on the idea of null and alternative hypotheses:
  • The null hypothesis assumes no real change or difference (e.g., the increase in Facebook usage might just be random).
  • The alternative hypothesis suggests a real difference (e.g., the increase signifies a genuine rise in Facebook usage).
By performing a statistical test, we assess which hypothesis is more plausible based on probability. If the test shows that the probability of the observed difference as a random event is low, we might reject the null hypothesis and consider the change significant.
Sampling
In statistics, sampling refers to selecting a smaller segment from a larger population to make conclusions about the whole. For the Pew Internet survey, they likely took a sample of American adults to represent the entire population. Sampling is crucial because surveying everyone is usually impractical or even impossible.
There are key concepts related to sampling that ensure reliability:
  • Random Sampling: Every individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected, minimizing bias.
  • Sample Size: Larger samples tend to provide more reliable estimates of the population.
Proper sampling is essential because it ensures the survey's findings are reflective of the broader population rather than being skewed by outliers or peculiarities in a smaller, non-representative group.
Random Fluctuation
Random fluctuation refers to variations in data that occur by chance rather than being caused by a specific, identifiable factor. For instance, if we were to flip a fair coin 100 times, we expect 50 heads on average. However, some random fluctuation might mean getting slightly more or fewer heads. With survey data, some variability is expected even without any actual change.
In the context of the exercise, we must distinguish between changes in Facebook usage that are merely random fluctuations and those that indicate a substantial and genuine trend. Statistical tests help differentiate random fluctuation from meaningful change. If the observed increase in usage from 2010 to 2013 is deemed significant, it's likely more than just random noise, reflecting an actual shift in user behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers at the National Cancer Institute released the results of a study that investigated the effect of weed-killing herbicides on house pets. They examined 827 dogs from homes where an herbicide was used on a regular basis, diagnosing malignant lymphoma in 473 of them. Of the 130 dogs from homes where no herbicides were used, only 19 were found to have lymphoma. a. What's the standard error of the difference in the two proportions? b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for this difference. c. State an appropriate conclusion.

There has been debate among doctors over whether surgery can prolong life among men suffering from prostate cancer, a type of cancer that typically develops and spreads very slowly. Recently, The New England Journal of Medicine published results of some Scandinavian research. Men diagnosed with prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either undergo surgery or not. Among the 347 men who had surgery, 16 eventually died of prostate cancer, compared with 31 of the 348 men who did not have surgery. a. Was this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. b. Create a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in rates of death for the two groups of men. c. Based on your confidence interval, is there evidence that surgery may be effective in preventing death from prostate cancer? Explain.

In Chapter 6 , Exercise 25 , we looked at collected samples of water from streams in the Adirondack Mountains to investigate the effects of acid rain. Researchers measured the pH (acidity) of the water and classified the streams with respect to the kind of substrate (type of rock over which they flow). A lower pH means the water is more acidic. Here is a boxplot of the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the streams by substrate (limestone, mixed, or shale): Here are selected parts of a software analysis comparing the pH of streams with limestone and shale substrates: 2 -Sample \(t\) -Test of \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) Difference Between Means \(=0.735\) \(t\) -Statistic \(=16.30 \mathrm{w} / 133 \mathrm{df}\) \(\mathrm{p} \leq 0.0001\) a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for this test. b. From the information you have, do the assumptions and conditions appear to be met? c. What conclusion would you draw?

In Exercise 53 , we saw a \(90 \%\) confidence interval of (-6.5,-1.4) grams for \(\mu_{\text {Meat }}-\mu_{\text {Beef }}\) the difference in mean fat content for meat vs. all-beef hot dogs. Explain why you think each of the following statements is true or false: a. If I eat a meat hot dog instead of a beef dog, there's a \(90 \%\) chance I'll consume less fat. b. \(90 \%\) of meat hot dogs have between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than a beef hot dog. c. I'm \(90 \%\) confident that meat hot dogs average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. d. If I were to get more samples of both kinds of hot dogs, \(90 \%\) of the time the meat hot dogs would average between 1.4 and 6.5 grams less fat than the beef hot dogs. e. If I tested more samples, l'd expect about \(90 \%\) of the resulting confidence intervals to include the true difference in mean fat content between the two kinds of hot dogs.

Is it a good idea to listen to music when studying for a big test? In a study conducted by some statistics students, 62 people were randomly assigned to listen to rap music, music by Mozart, or no music while attempting to memorize objects pictured on a page. They were then asked to list all the objects they could remember. Here are summary statistics for each group: a. Does it appear that it is better to study while listening to Mozart than to rap music? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. b. Create a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference in memory score between students who study to Mozart and those who listen to no music at all. Interpret your interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.