/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 He cheats? A friend of yours cla... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

He cheats? A friend of yours claims that when he tosses a coin he can control the outcome. You are skeptical and want him to prove it. He tosses the coin, and you call heads; it's tails. You try again and lose again. a. Do two losses in a row convince you that he really can control the toss? Explain. b. You try a third time, and again you lose. What's the probability of losing three tosses in a row if the process is fair? c. Would three losses in a row convince you that your friend controls the outcome? Explain. d. How many times in a row would you have to lose to be pretty sure that this friend really can control the toss? Justify your answer by calculating a probability and explaining what it means.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Two losses in a row is not enough to convince you that he really can control the toss because the probability of it happening is 25%, which is not extremely low. \n b. The probability of losing 3 tosses in a row if the process is fair is 12.5%. \n c. Three losses in a row are also not enough to strongly convince you due to a 12.5% possibility. \n d. The number of times needed to be convincing depends on how low a probability you would find 'convincing'. For instance, if you felt 1% was a suitably low probability, you would need to lose all 7 attempts in a row.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret the Experiment

Firstly, when a fair coin is tossed, both outcomes (Heads and Tails) are equally likely. Each toss is an independent event, so the outcome of one does not affect the outcome of another.
02

Calculate Probability of Two Losses

In this case, a 'loss' is getting tails. The probability of getting tails in each toss is \(\frac{1}{2} = 0.5\) because there are 2 equally likely outcomes. Therefore, the chances of losing twice in a row is \(0.5 * 0.5 = 0.25\) or 25%.
03

Calculate Probability of Three Losses

Following the same logic, losing a third time equates to getting tails again, which also has a probability of 0.5. Thus, the probability of losing three times in a row is \(0.5 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.125\) or 12.5%.
04

Calculate Arbitrary Number of Losses

To calculate the probability of losing 'x' times in a row, you would have to multiply 0.5 by itself 'x' times. This result gets smaller the larger 'x' gets, thus the less likely the outcome is just by chance and the more indication there is of some control over the toss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Events
When studying independent events, it's important to realize that these events do not affect one another.
In the context of a fair coin toss, each flip is an independent event. This means the result of one toss—whether it is heads or tails—does not influence the outcome of the subsequent toss.
An easy way to think about this is by considering that every time a coin is tossed, it's like starting fresh.
  • If you toss a coin and get heads, the probability of getting heads or tails on your next toss still remains unaffected at 50% for each outcome.
  • This property of independence in probability is a crucial aspect of random experiments, emphasizing the chance-driven nature of each event.
Understanding this concept helps us analyze situations without falsely attributing a pattern or influence to random events.
Fair Coin Toss
A fair coin toss implies that the coin is unbiased, meaning it doesn't favor heads or tails.
Essentially, each outcome has an equal probability of occurring, which is \(\frac{1}{2}\) or 50% for heads and 50% for tails.
To better comprehend this concept:
  • Think of a perfect balance, like a scale, where each side is equally weighted.
    This balanced aspect ensures that no external factors or imperfections in the coin introduce a bias.
  • A fair coin creates a simple model of probability where outcomes are predictably random and each trial is unaffected by previously recorded results, aligning well with the idea of independent events.
In scenarios where fairness is assumed, such as coin flipping games or probability exercises, it serves as a basis for understanding more complex probability calculations.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation involves determining the likelihood of a specific outcome or a series of outcomes.
For a fair coin toss, calculating probabilities also demonstrates how different events interact when they are combined.
Here's how to calculate it step-by-step:
  • Start by acknowledging that each individual toss has a probability of \(\frac{1}{2}\) for either outcome.
  • When you want to calculate the probability of multiple outcomes in a row (like losing three times or "tails" each time), you multiply the probability of a single event occurring by itself for each event.
    So, for three tails in a row, it's \(0.5 \times 0.5 \times 0.5 = 0.125\) which translates to 12.5%.
  • This multiplication rule applies because each toss is independent, and thus we repeatedly apply the basic probability for each additional event.
Understanding how to calculate these probabilities is essential in determining how rare or expected a particular sequence of outcomes is under given conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Parameters and hypotheses For each of the following situations, define the parameter (proportion or mean) and write the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of parameter values. Example: We want to know if the proportion of up days in the stock market is \(50 \% .\) Answer: Let \(p=\) the proportion of up days. \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.5 \mathrm{vs} . \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p \neq 0.5\) a. A casino wants to know if their slot machine really delivers the 1 in 100 win rate that it claims. b. Last year, customers spent an average of \(\$ 35.32\) per visit to the company's website. Based on a random sample of purchases this year, the company wants to know if the mean this year has changed. c. A pharmaceutical company wonders if their new drug has a cure rate different from the \(30 \%\) reported by the placebo. d. A bank wants to know if the percentage of customers using their website has changed from the \(40 \%\) that used it before their system crashed last week.

Empty houses According to the 2010 Census, \(11.4 \%\) of all housing units in the United States were vacant. A county supervisor wonders if her county is different from this. She randomly selects 850 housing units in her county and finds that 129 of the housing units are vacant. a. State the hypotheses. b. Name the model and check appropriate conditions for a hypothesis test. c. Draw and label a sketch, and then calculate the test statistic and P-value. d. State your conclusion.

A national vital statistics report indicated that about \(3 \%\) of all births produced twins. Is the rate of twin births the same among very young mothers? Data from a large city hospital found that only 7 sets of twins were born to 469 teenage girls. Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. Be sure the appropriate assumptions and conditions are satisfied before you proceed.

Contributions, please II We learned in Chapter 16 ?, Exercise 35 ? that the Paralyzed Veterans of America recently sent letters to a random sample of 100,000 potential donors and received 4781 donations. They've had a contribution rate of \(5 \%\) in past campaigns, but a staff member worries that the rate is lower now that they've redesigned their letter. Is there evidence that the \(4.78 \%\) they received is evidence of a real drop in the contribution rate? a. What are the hypotheses? b. Are the assumptions and conditions for inference met? c. Do you think the rate would drop? Explain.

Women executives A company is criticized because only 13 of 43 people in executive-level positions are women. The company explains that although this proportion is lower than it might wish, it's not a surprising value given that only \(40 \%\) of all its employees are women. What do you think? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. Be sure the appropriate assumptions and conditions are satisfied before you proceed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.