/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Psychic A friend of yours claims... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Psychic A friend of yours claims to be psychic. You are skeptical. To test this you take a stack of 100 playing cards and have your friend try to identify the suit (hearts, diamonds, clubs, or spades), without looking, of course! State the null hypothesis for your experiment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis is that there is no statistical significance between the friend's ability to predict the suit of playing cards and random guessing. The friend is just guessing at a rate no better than 25%, which is the chance rate due to there being 4 possible suits.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Random Variable

In this experiment, the random variable is the suit of a card predicted by a friend. The outcome can be one of four possibilities: 'hearts', 'diamonds', 'clubs', or 'spades'.
02

Identify the Null Hypothesis

In a hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (usually denoted as \(H_0\)) is a statement about the population that either is believed to be true or is used to put forth an argument unless it can be shown to be incorrect beyond a reasonable doubt. The null hypothesis for this experiment would state that the friend is merely guessing the suits of the cards, and there is no significant difference between the observed outcome (their guesses) and the expected outcome (random chance). In terms of probability, since there are 4 suits, the random chance of correctly guessing the suit of a card is \(1/4\) or 25%.
03

Formulate the Null Hypothesis Statement

Now, formulating the null hypothesis statement for this experiment, we can say, 'There is no statistical significance between the friend's ability to predict the suit of playing cards and random guessing. The friend's correct predictions are believed to be due to pure chance, with a success rate of 25% (1 out of 4 suits).'

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used in statistics to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition holds for the entire population. In the context of our psychic friend exercise, hypothesis testing allows us to objectively assess the claim of psychic ability.Before we dive into the testing itself, we must state two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (denoted as \(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (denoted as \(H_1\) or \(H_a\)). The null hypothesis typically represents the current accepted fact or no effect scenario, which in this case is that your friend cannot actually predict the suit of playing cards and is just guessing. The alternative hypothesis is the statement you wish to test and validate, which represents the presence of an effect, being that your friend indeed possesses psychic abilities. Conducting the test, we will analyze the evidence and decide whether to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, or not to reject the null hypothesis due to insufficient evidence.
Random Variable
In any statistical experiment, a random variable is a numerical description of the outcome of that experiment. For our exercise, the random variable represents the suit of a card predicted by your friend. Because the suit can be one of four categories - hearts, diamonds, clubs, or spades - we are dealing with a discrete random variable.

Understanding Discrete Random Variables

A discrete random variable has a countable number of possible values. In our case, the countable values are the four suits. Every time your psychic friend predicts a suit, they generate an outcome for our random variable. Assessing their ability to predict correctly will involve examining the frequency of each suit they guess over multiple trials and comparing this to what we would expect by chance.
Probability
Let's simplify probability: it's essentially a way to measure how likely something is to occur. In the scenario where your friend is guessing the suit of playing cards, each guess they make has an associated probability of being correct or incorrect.When we assume the friend is not psychic and is purely guessing, the probability of correctly predicting the suit is \(1/4\), or 25%, because there are four equally likely outcomes. This is because, under the assumption of random guessing, each suit is equally likely to be chosen. Probability allows us to set expectations for how your friend's predictions should align with the guessing model if, indeed, there is no psychic ability at play.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination about the non-randomness of results obtained from a hypothesis test. It tells us whether any differences observed between the expected outcome and the actual results are due to chance, or if they are likely due to the factor being tested—in this case, psychic abilities.

Interpreting Statistical Significance

The concept of statistical significance is closely tied to probabilities. In hypothesis testing, if the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the ones collected is less than a pre-specified significance level (often \(0.05\) or 5%), we say our results are statistically significant. This means that it's unlikely our observed results happened due to chance alone. In our exercise with psychic abilities, finding statistical significance might mean the friend's predictions differ from what would be expected by mere guessing in a way that is not likely to be due to random variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

He cheats? A friend of yours claims that when he tosses a coin he can control the outcome. You are skeptical and want him to prove it. He tosses the coin, and you call heads; it's tails. You try again and lose again. a. Do two losses in a row convince you that he really can control the toss? Explain. b. You try a third time, and again you lose. What's the probability of losing three tosses in a row if the process is fair? c. Would three losses in a row convince you that your friend controls the outcome? Explain. d. How many times in a row would you have to lose to be pretty sure that this friend really can control the toss? Justify your answer by calculating a probability and explaining what it means.

Pizza A researcher tests whether the mean cholesterol level among those who eat frozen pizza exceeds the value considered to indicate a health risk. She gets a P-value of 0.07. Explain in this context what the "7\%" represents.

A test preparation company claims that more than \(50 \%\) of the students who take their GRE prep course improve their scores by at least 10 points. a. Is the alternative to the null hypothesis more naturally one-sided or two- sided? Explain. b. A test run with randomly selected participants gives a P-value of 0.981 . What do you conclude? c. What would you have concluded if the \(\mathrm{P}\) -value had been \(0.019 ?\)

The College Board reported that \(60.3 \%\) of all students who took the 2016 AP Statistics exam earned scores of 3 or higher. One teacher wondered if the performance of her school was better. She believed that year's students to be typical of those who will take AP Stats at that school and was pleased when 34 of her 54 students achieved scores of 3 or better. a. How many standard deviations above the national rate did her students score? Does that seem like a lot? Explain. b. Can she claim that her school is better? Explain.

Empty houses According to the 2010 Census, \(11.4 \%\) of all housing units in the United States were vacant. A county supervisor wonders if her county is different from this. She randomly selects 850 housing units in her county and finds that 129 of the housing units are vacant. a. State the hypotheses. b. Name the model and check appropriate conditions for a hypothesis test. c. Draw and label a sketch, and then calculate the test statistic and P-value. d. State your conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.