/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 137 Situations comparing two proport... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Situations comparing two proportions are described. In each case, determine whether the situation involves comparing proportions for two groups or comparing two proportions from the same group. State whether the methods of this section apply to the difference in proportions. (a) Compare the proportion of students who use a Windows-based \(\mathrm{PC}\) to the proportion who use a Mac. (b) Compare the proportion of students who study abroad between those attending public universities and those at private universities. (c) Compare the proportion of in-state students at a university to the proportion from outside the state. (d) Compare the proportion of in-state students who get financial aid to the proportion of outof-state students who get financial aid.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In all the given scenarios - (a), (b), (c), and (d), the comparisons involve two separate groups in each. Hence, the method involving comparing proportions can be applied.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Type - Scenario (a)

The scenario compares the proportion of students who use a Windows-based PC to those who use a Mac. These are two separate groups: 'Windows PC users' and 'Mac users'. The method involving comparison of proportions can be applied here.
02

Identify Type - Scenario (b)

In this scenario, the proportion of students studying abroad from public universities is compared to those from private universities. Again, two separate groups are involved, 'public university students' and 'private university students', and the comparison of proportions is applicable.
03

Identify Type - Scenario (c)

This scenario involves comparing the proportion of in-state students at a university to the proportion of students from outside state. These represent two separate groups - 'in-state students' and 'out-of-state students'. The comparison of proportions method is applicable.
04

Identify Type - Scenario (d)

Here we compare the proportion of in-state students who get financial aid to the proportion of out-of-state students who get financial aid. The two groups in this scenario are 'in-state students receiving financial aid' and 'out-of-state students getting financial aid'. The comparison of proportions method applies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Inference
When we talk about statistical inference, we're referring to the process of drawing conclusions about a population based on a sample. This is a central concept in statistics, as it allows us to make estimations and hypotheses about a larger group without needing to survey every individual. In the context of comparing proportions, statistical inference saves time and resources by enabling us to assess the population proportions through the sample proportions – which are estimates derived from the sample data.

One common method of statistical inference is hypothesis testing, where we use sample data to make inferences about a population parameter, such as a proportion. We might, for example, want to infer whether the proportion of public university students who study abroad differs from that of private university students. We'd collect a sample from each group, calculate the sample proportions, and perform a hypothesis test to make our inference. Careful sampling and appropriate test selection are paramount in ensuring accurate and reliable results.
Proportion Comparison Analysis
Moving on to proportion comparison analysis, this analysis involves comparing the proportions of a characteristic between two groups. For example, when comparing the proportion of Mac users to Windows PC users, a form of binary data (Mac user or not, Windows PC user or not), one must use statistical methods designed for comparing two proportions. The two key proportions are p1 (the proportion in the first group) and p2 (the proportion in the second group).

We usually perform a hypothesis test to determine if there is a significant difference between p1 and p2. To do this, we calculate the difference between the sample proportions and determine whether this difference is large enough to conclude that there is a difference in the overall population proportions. Important to note is that these types of analyses assume the data is from independent groups, which leads us to our next concept.
Independent Groups
The concept of independent groups is crucial when comparing proportions. Independent groups mean that the two groups being compared do not overlap, and the outcomes for one group do not affect the outcomes for the other. For instance, in a situation where we're comparing the proportions of in-state students to out-of-state students, it's clear that an individual cannot be part of both groups concurrently—hence, the groups are independent.

In statistical analysis, the assumption of independence is a key prerequisite for many tests, including the commonly used two-proportion z-test. This assumption holds that the sampling or randomization process yields groups that are representative of their respective populations and do not influence each other. When we examine scenario (c) from the exercise, where we compare the proportion of in-state versus out-of-state students, our inference is made based on the assumption that these groups are independent.
Binary Data Analysis
Lastly, let's address binary data analysis. Binary data means that there are only two outcomes for each observation – for example, 'yes' or 'no', 'success' or 'failure', 'Windows PC user' or 'not a Windows PC user'. Binary data is common in proportion comparison analyses because often we're interested in the proportion of successes or the presence of a characteristic within a group.

In scenario (a) where we compare the proportion of Windows PC users to Mac users, each student surveyed provides binary data (they're either one or the other). Such binary outcomes can be analyzed with the help of various statistical tests designed specifically for binary data, such as the Chi-square test for independence or Fisher's exact test. These tests help to determine if the observed proportions between two categories are significantly different from what we would expect by chance, thus enabling us to draw conclusions about the population from our sample data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Split the Bill? Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The data in SplitBill includes the cost of what each person ordered (in Israeli shekels) and the payment method (Individual or Split). Some summary statistics are provided in Table 6.20 and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to test (at a \(5 \%\) level ) if there is evidence that the mean cost is higher when people split the bill. You may have done this test using randomizations in Exercise 4.118 on page 302 .

Survival Status and Heart Rate in the ICU The dataset ICUAdmissions contains information on a sample of 200 patients being admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at a hospital. One of the variables is HeartRate and another is Status which indicates whether the patient lived (Status \(=0)\) or died (Status \(=1\) ). Use the computer output to give the details of a test to determine whether mean heart rate is different between patients who lived and died. (You should not do any computations. State the hypotheses based on the output, read the p-value off the output, and state the conclusion in context.) Two-sample \(\mathrm{T}\) for HeartRate \(\begin{array}{lrrrr}\text { Status } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 0 & 160 & 98.5 & 27.0 & 2.1 \\ 1 & 40 & 100.6 & 26.5 & 4.2 \\ \text { Difference } & = & m u(0) & -\operatorname{mu}(1) & \end{array}\) Estimate for difference: -2.13 \(95 \% \mathrm{Cl}\) for difference: (-11.53,7.28) T-Test of difference \(=0\) (vs not \(=\) ): T-Value \(=-0.45\) P-Value \(=0.653\) DF \(=60\)

Exercises 6.192 and 6.193 examine the results of a study \(^{45}\) investigating whether fast food consumption increases one's concentration of phthalates, an ingredient in plastics that has been linked to multiple health problems including hormone disruption. The study included 8,877 people who recorded all the food they ate over a 24 -hour period and then provided a urine sample. Two specific phthalate byproducts were measured (in \(\mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) ) in the urine: DEHP and DiNP. Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference, \(\mu_{F}-\mu_{N},\) in mean concentration between people who have eaten fast food in the last 24 hours and those who haven't. The mean concentration of DEHP in the 3095 participants who had eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{F}=83.6\) with \(s_{F}=194.7\) while the mean for the 5782 participants who had not eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{N}=59.1\) with \(s_{N}=152.1\)

\(\mathbf{6 . 2 2 0}\) Diet Cola and Calcium Exercise B.3 on page 349 introduces a study examining the effect of diet cola consumption on calcium levels in women. A sample of 16 healthy women aged 18 to 40 were randomly assigned to drink 24 ounces of either diet cola or water. Their urine was collected for three hours after ingestion of the beverage and calcium excretion (in \(\mathrm{mg}\) ) was measured. The summary statistics for diet cola are \(\bar{x}_{C}=56.0\) with \(s_{C}=4.93\) and \(n_{C}=8\) and the summary statistics for water are \(\bar{x}_{W}=49.1\) with \(s_{W}=3.64\) and \(n_{W}=8 .\) Figure 6.20 shows dotplots of the data values. Test whether there is evidence that diet cola leaches calcium out of the system, which would increase the amount of calcium in the urine for diet cola drinkers. In Exercise \(\mathrm{B} .3\), we used a randomization distribution to conduct this test. Use a t-distribution here, after first checking that the conditions are met and explaining your reasoning. The data are stored in ColaCalcium.

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.