/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 50 In Exercises 4.50 and 4.51 , a r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 4.50 and 4.51 , a randomization distribution is given for a hypothesis test, and shows what values of the sample statistic are likely to occur if the null hypothesis is true. Several possible values are given for a sample statistic. In each case, indicate whether seeing a sample statistic as extreme as the value given is (i) reasonably likely to occur when the null hypothesis is true, (ii) unusual but might occur occasionally when the null hypothesis is true, or (iii) extremely unlikely to ever occur when the null hvpothesis is true. Figure 4.13 (a) shows a randomization distribution for a hypothesis test with \(H_{0}: p=0.30\). Answer the question for these possible sample proportions: (a) \(\hat{p}=0.1\) (b) \(\hat{p}=0.35\) (c) \(\hat{p}=0.6\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \(\hat{p}=0.1\) is (iii) extremely unlikely to ever occur when the null hypothesis is true. (b) \(\hat{p}=0.35\) is (ii) unusual but might occur occasionally when the null hypothesis is true. (c) \(\hat{p}=0.6\) is (iii) extremely unlikely to ever occur when the null hypothesis is true.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Hypothesis

The null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.30\), proposes that the population proportion \(p\) equals 0.30.
02

Comparing \(\hat{p}=0.1\) with the Null Hypothesis

\(p=0.1\) is quite a distance from the null value of \(p=0.30\). Hence, getting a sample proportion as extreme as \(\hat{p}=0.1\) is not reasonably likely to occur when the null hypothesis is true. We can categorize the probability of occurrence as (iii) extremely unlikely to ever occur when the null hypothesis is true.
03

Comparing \(\hat{p}=0.35\) with the Null Hypothesis

Comparing \(p=0.35\) with the null hypothesis, it is closer but still not identical. Thus, it's unusual but might occur occasionally when the null hypothesis is true. We can categorize it as (ii) unusual but might occur occasionally when the null hypothesis is true.
04

Comparing \(\hat{p}=0.6\) with the Null Hypothesis

\(p=0.6\) is very far from the null hypothesis. This is not at all likely considering our null hypothesis. So, it is (iii) extremely unlikely to ever occur when the null hypothesis is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization Distribution
A randomization distribution helps us to visualize how the sample statistics would behave if the null hypothesis is true. Imagine tossing a coin multiple times. The outcomes can vary, but they tend to cluster around a certain point if the coin is fair. That's what randomization distribution does for a hypothesis test.

Here's how it works:
  • You assume the null hypothesis is true.
  • Generate multiple samples based on this assumption.
  • Record the statistics from each sample and create a distribution.
This distribution shows us the likelihood of observing various sample statistics. Values near the center of this distribution mean they are quite likely, while those at the tails or extreme ends are rare.
When a test statistic falls towards the outer edges, it challenges our assumption of the null hypothesis being true.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often symbolized as \(H_0\), is a vital part of hypothesis testing. It proposes a specific claim or assumption about a population parameter. In our example, the null hypothesis was \(H_0: p=0.30\).

Here’s the essence of what it involves:
  • The null hypothesis assumes no effect or no difference in the context of the study.
  • It provides a baseline to help us decide if observed data provides enough evidence to reject it.
  • Typically, the null hypothesis is an equality, like \(p = 0.30\).
Rejecting the null hypothesis suggests that the observed data is inconsistent with what we expected under the null hypothesis. Remember, failing to reject it, however, does not prove it true; it simply means there's not enough evidence against it.
Sample Statistic
A sample statistic is a numerical measure based on a sample extracted from a larger population. It's like a snapshot of the whole population but crafted from simpler, smaller data.

In hypothesis testing:
  • It is used to estimate the population parameter.
  • Common statistics include sample mean \(\overline{x}\), sample proportion \(\hat{p}\), or sample standard deviation \(s\).
  • We compare this statistic to what's expected under the null hypothesis.
For example, in the exercise given, we looked at sample proportions such as \(\hat{p} = 0.1\). By comparing this to our null hypothesis \(p = 0.30\), we could investigate if this observed statistic is typical or not under the established assumption.
It's a critical tool in the toolbox of a statistician, used to draw conclusions and make decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting a P-value In each case, indicate whether the statement is a proper interpretation of what a p-value measures. (a) The probability the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (b) The probability that the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true. (c) The probability of seeing data as extreme as the sample, when the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (d) The probability of making a Type I error if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (e) The probability of making a Type II error if the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true.

Do you think that students undergo physiological changes when in potentially stressful situations such as taking a quiz or exam? A sample of statistics students were interrupted in the middle of a quiz and asked to record their pulse rates (beats for a 1-minute period). Ten of the students had also measured their pulse rate while sitting in class listening to a lecture, and these values were matched with their quiz pulse rates. The data appear in Table 4.18 and are stored in QuizPulse10. Note that this is paired data since we have two values, a quiz and a lecture pulse rate, for each student in the sample. The question of interest is whether quiz pulse rates tend to be higher, on average, than lecture pulse rates. (Hint: Since this is paired data, we work with the differences in pulse rate for each student between quiz and lecture. If the differences are \(D=\) quiz pulse rate minus lecture pulse rate, the question of interest is whether \(\mu_{D}\) is greater than zero.) Table 4.18 Quiz and Lecture pulse rates for I0 students $$\begin{array}{lcccccccccc} \text { Student } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \hline \text { Quiz } & 75 & 52 & 52 & 80 & 56 & 90 & 76 & 71 & 70 & 66 \\\ \text { Lecture } & 73 & 53 & 47 & 88 & 55 & 70 & 61 & 75 & 61 & 78 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) Define the parameter(s) of interest and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Determine an appropriate statistic to measure and compute its value for the original sample. (c) Describe a method to generate randomization samples that is consistent with the null hypothesis and reflects the paired nature of the data. There are several viable methods. You might use shuffled index cards, a coin, or some other randomization procedure. (d) Carry out your procedure to generate one randomization sample and compute the statistic you chose in part (b) for this sample. (e) Is the statistic for your randomization sample more extreme (in the direction of the alternative) than the original sample?

Giving a Coke/Pepsi taste test to random people in New York City to determine if there is evidence for the claim that Pepsi is preferred.

Give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=42 / 100=0.42\) with \(n=100\)

Exercise 4.19 on page 269 describes a study investigating the effects of exercise on cognitive function. \({ }^{31}\) Separate groups of mice were exposed to running wheels for \(0,2,4,7,\) or 10 days. Cognitive function was measured by \(Y\) maze performance. The study was testing whether exercise improves brain function, whether exercise reduces levels of BMP (a protein which makes the brain slower and less nimble), and whether exercise increases the levels of noggin (which improves the brain's ability). For each of the results quoted in parts (a), (b), and (c), interpret the information about the p-value in terms of evidence for the effect. (a) "Exercise improved Y-maze performance in most mice by the 7 th day of exposure, with further increases after 10 days for all mice tested \((p<.01)\) (b) "After only two days of running, BMP ... was reduced \(\ldots\) and it remained decreased for all subsequent time-points \((p<.01)\)." (c) "Levels of noggin ... did not change until 4 days, but had increased 1.5 -fold by \(7-10\) days of exercise \((p<.001)\)." (d) Which of the tests appears to show the strongest statistical effect? (e) What (if anything) can we conclude about the effects of exercise on mice?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.