/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Giving a Coke/Pepsi taste test t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Giving a Coke/Pepsi taste test to random people in New York City to determine if there is evidence for the claim that Pepsi is preferred.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Carrying out a taste test, counting the preferences for Pepsi, and calculating the Pepsi preference rate will enable to make a basic judgment on whether Pepsi is preferred by most participants. A more statistically rigorous claim would require a more deep-seated analysis including hypothesis testing.

Step by step solution

01

Conduct the Taste Test

Carry out a taste test among random participants in New York City. Sample groups from a range of demographics to ensure the results are non-biased. Each participant should taste both drinks (Coke and Pepsi) in random order, without knowing which one they're tasting. Record their choice after they have tasted both drinks.
02

Data Collection and Representation

At the end of the day, count the total number of participants and the number of participants who preferred Pepsi over Coke. May represent the data in tabular or graphical format for clearer understanding. It's a simple binary choice situation, so representing the data using pie charts or bar graphs might work well.
03

Data Analysis

Calculate the percentage of participants who preferred Pepsi over Coke by dividing the number of Pepsi preferences by the total number of participants and multiplying by 100. This will give the preference rate for Pepsi.
04

Result Interpretation

If the Pepsi preference rate is over 50%, this would suggest that in the sample group, Pepsi is favored over Coke. If it's much higher or somewhat near to 50%, it might suggest that Pepsi has an advantage in the population, but we need to account for randomness and uncertainties due to the size and randomness in the sampling process. Statistically, a hypothesis test may need to be conducted to assert the claim more rigorously. However, a simple preference rate can give a basic understanding on people's preference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Data Collection in Taste Tests
Data collection is a crucial step in any statistical study, as it sets the foundation for all subsequent analysis. In the context of a taste test, such as the Coke vs. Pepsi challenge, data must be collected methodically to ensure accurate and reliable results. To start with, a random sample of participants must be selected to avoid bias. This sample should represent various demographics, such as age, gender, and ethnicity, to reflect the broader population's preferences.

In practice, each participant is asked to taste both beverages without knowing which is which, a method known as a 'blind taste test' to prevent preconceived notions from influencing their preference. After tasting both options, they indicate their favored drink. This response is binary—Pepsi or Coke—making it relatively straightforward to record and tally. However, it's essential to consider external factors that may affect the results, like the time of day, location of the test, or even the weather, as these can all inadvertently influence taste perception. The outcome of this stage is a dataset that should accurately reflect the participants' preferences and be representative of the larger population.
Data Analysis in Experimental Research
Once data is collected, the next step is to make sense of it through data analysis. For the Pepsi vs. Coke taste test scenario, analysis begins by converting raw numbers into percentages, providing an immediate visual on which soda was preferred. For instance, if 60 out of 100 participants favored Pepsi, this translates to a 60% preference rate for Pepsi over Coke.

However, to derive deeper insights from this data, researchers might employ more sophisticated statistical methods. They can calculate measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) to understand general trends, or measures of variability (standard deviation, variance) to appreciate the data's spread. Also, considering the sample size is crucial since a larger sample generally provides more reliable results.

Visual Representation of Data

Graphs like pie charts and bar graphs are commonly used because they are visually intuitive. Pie charts can quickly convey how large the preference for Pepsi is relative to Coke, while a bar graph can help compare the number of people preferring each drink side by side—critical for a clear presentation of findings to others.
Hypothesis Testing Explained
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine if there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer a particular condition for the entire population. In the taste test example, the hypothesis might be that 'Pepsi is preferred over Coke.' This is known as the alternative hypothesis, often shown as 'H1'. The null hypothesis 'H0' might state that there is no preference between Coke and Pepsi.

To test these hypotheses, researchers would use a hypothesis testing framework, such as the p-value approach, to determine the probability of obtaining a result equal to or more extreme than what was observed, purely by chance, given that the null hypothesis is true. If this probability (the p-value) is below a predetermined significance level, such as 0.05, the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative. This means that the data provides sufficient evidence to suggest that indeed Pepsi is preferred over Coke.

It's essential to realize that hypothesis testing does not prove a hypothesis to be true or false; instead, it assesses whether the available data provides strong enough evidence to reasonably reject one hypothesis in favor of the other. It is why stating 'failure to reject the null hypothesis' is more accurate than saying 'the null hypothesis is accepted' when the evidence isn't strong enough.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Approval Rating for Congress In a Gallup poll \(^{51}\) conducted in December 2015 , a random sample of \(n=824\) American adults were asked "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?" The proportion who said they approve is \(\hat{p}=0.13,\) and a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for Congressional job approval is 0.107 to 0.153 . If we use a 5\% significance level, what is the conclusion if we are: (a) Testing to see if there is evidence that the job approval rating is different than \(14 \%\). (This happens to be the average sample approval rating from the six months prior to this poll.) (b) Testing to see if there is evidence that the job approval rating is different than \(9 \%\). (This happens to be the lowest sample Congressional approval rating Gallup ever recorded through the time of the poll.)

Influencing Voters When getting voters to support a candidate in an election, is there a difference between a recorded phone call from the candidate or a flyer about the candidate sent through the mail? A sample of 500 voters is randomly divided into two groups of 250 each, with one group getting the phone call and one group getting the flyer. The voters are then contacted to see if they plan to vote for the candidate in question. We wish to see if there is evidence that the proportions of support are different between the two methods of campaigning. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Possible sample results are shown in Table 4.3 . Compute the two sample proportions: \(\hat{p}_{c},\) the proportion of voters getting the phone call who say they will vote for the candidate, and \(\hat{p}_{f},\) the proportion of voters getting the flyer who say they will vote for the candidate. Is there a difference in the sample proportions? (c) A different set of possible sample results are shown in Table 4.4. Compute the same two sample proportions for this table. (d) Which of the two samples seems to offer stronger evidence of a difference in effectiveness between the two campaign methods? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { Sample A } \end{array} & \text { for Candidate } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 152 & 98 \\ \text { Flyer } & 145 & 105 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Sample B } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 188 & 62 \\ \text { Flyer } & 120 & 130 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Income East and West of the Mississippi For a random sample of households in the US, we record annual household income, whether the location is east or west of the Mississippi River, and number of children. We are interested in determining whether there is a difference in average household income between those east of the Mississippi and those west of the Mississippi. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) What statistic(s) from the sample would we use to estimate the difference?

Flying Home for the Holidays, On Time In Exercise 4.115 on page \(302,\) we compared the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival times for December flights on two major airlines: Delta and United. Suppose now that we are only interested in the proportion of flights arriving more than 30 minutes after the scheduled time. Of the 1,000 Delta flights, 67 arrived more than 30 minutes late, and of the 1,000 United flights, 160 arrived more than 30 minutes late. We are testing to see if this provides evidence to conclude that the proportion of flights that are over 30 minutes late is different between flying United or Delta. (a) State the null and alternative hypothesis. (b) What statistic will be recorded for each of the simulated samples to create the randomization distribution? What is the value of that statistic for the observed sample? (c) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution. Estimate the p-value for the observed statistic found in part (b). (d) At a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\), what is the conclusion of the test? Interpret in context. (e) Now assume we had only collected samples of size \(75,\) but got essentially the same proportions (5/75 late flights for Delta and \(12 / 75\) late flights for United). Repeating steps (b) through (d) on these smaller samples, do you come to the same conclusion?

In a test to see whether males, on average, have bigger noses than females, the study indicates that " \(p<0.01\)."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.