/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 151 4.151 Does Massage Really Help R... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 151

4.151 Does Massage Really Help Reduce Inflammation in Muscles? In Exercise 4.112 on page \(301,\) we learn that massage helps reduce levels of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in muscles when muscle tissue is tested 2.5 hours after massage. The results were significant at the \(5 \%\) level. However, the authors of the study actually performed 42 different tests: They tested for significance with 21 different compounds in muscles and at two different times (right after the massage and 2.5 hours after). (a) Given this new information, should we have less confidence in the one result described in the earlier exercise? Why? (b) Sixteen of the tests done by the authors involved measuring the effects of massage on muscle metabolites. None of these tests were significant. Do you think massage affects muscle metabolites? (c) Eight of the tests done by the authors (including the one described in the earlier exercise) involved measuring the effects of massage on inflammation in the muscle. Four of these tests were significant. Do you think it is safe to conclude that massage really does reduce inflammation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) We should have less confidence, considering the issue of multiple comparisons. b) We cannot definitively state that a massage does not affect muscle metabolites, a lack of significant results doesn't confirm absence of an effect. c) It's plausible, given that half the tests showed significant results, but caution should be exercised, considering the possibility of false positives due to multiple testing.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding The Question (a)

This part of the exercise asks you to consider the possibility of getting a significant result due to chance because 42 tests were conducted. Therefore, statistical principles that measure the reliability of the data must be considered. The significant result could merely be a false positive.
02

Answer to The Question (a)

Yes, there should be less confidence in the result described in the earlier exercise. Although the result is statistically significant at the 5% level, because the authors performed 42 tests, there is a likelihood that some results will be statistically significant by pure chance. This is known as the problem of multiple comparisons.
03

Understanding The Question (b)

This segment of the exercise demands an understanding of the impact of non-significant results. The absence of a significant result doesn't necessarily mean no impact. It only demonstrates that the test wasn't robust enough to detect a difference.
04

Answer to The Question (b)

We can't definitively say that massage does not affect muscle metabolites based on the lack of significant results from the study. This is because non-significant results do not mean the absence of an effect, but only that the test did not detect a difference.
05

Understanding the Question (c)

It asks for an opinion based on the data provided. Four out of eight tests were significant, which could suggest that massage reduces inflammation, but there is still the issue of multiple testing.
06

Answer to The Question (c)

Considering that half of the tests carried out regarding inflammation showed significant results, it could be suggested that massage likely reduces inflammation. However, this conclusion should be made with caution, considering the issue of multiple testing where false positives could occur. Therefore, further studies should be carried out to further authenticate these results. A final conclusion can only be made when dates from multiple studies are consistent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Multiple Comparisons
When conducting multiple tests simultaneously, like the 42 tests conducted in the study about massage and inflammation, there's a greater chance of finding false positives. This statistical phenomenon is known as the problem of "multiple comparisons" or "multiple testing." Each test has its own probability of showing a significant result, often designated by a p-value. Usually, if the p-value is less than 0.05, the result is considered statistically significant. But when you perform numerous tests, the likelihood that at least one of them yields a "significant" result just by random chance increases.

In simpler terms, the more tests you run, the higher the chances that at least one of them will show a significant result purely by accident. Imagine tossing a coin 42 times and getting heads a few times in a row; it's bound to happen even if the coin is fair. Therefore, when reviewing studies with numerous tests, it's vital to use statistical corrections such as the Bonferroni correction to adjust the significance level. This issue underscores the importance of transparent reporting and careful interpretation of statistical results in scientific research.
Inflammation Reduction
Inflammation is a natural bodily response to injury or infection, characterized by symptoms like redness, swelling, and pain. In this study, researchers examined whether massage could reduce inflammation by analyzing the levels of inflammatory compounds in the muscle tissue. Specifically, they focused on compounds like interleukin-6, a cytokine linked to inflammation.

The study showed that massage significantly reduced the levels of interleukin-6 in some of the tests. However, due to the multiple comparisons issue previously mentioned, these results could partially be due to chance. To reliably claim that massage helps in reducing inflammation, consistent outcomes across several independent studies are necessary. Additionally, considering the variety of different inflammatory markers and technical variances between studies, conflicting results can arise. It's essential to examine a broad spectrum of data to draw significant conclusions.
  • Massage may influence the inflammatory response in muscles.
  • Results must be interpreted carefully due to the issue of multiple testing.
  • Continuous research and repeated studies can strengthen claims about massage's effects on inflammation reduction.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant effect or difference in an experiment, such as the effect of massage on muscle inflammation. In this methodology, a null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and an alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) are formulated. The null hypothesis generally states that there is no effect, while the alternative hypothesis suggests there is an effect.

In the massage study, for instance, the null hypothesis might be that massage does not affect inflammation, whereas the alternative hypothesis would state the opposite鈥攖hat massage does reduce inflammation. By analyzing collected data, researchers can decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

If the p-value, statistically representing the likelihood of the observed data under the null hypothesis, is less than a specified significance level (often 0.05), researchers generally reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. However, as seen in multiple comparisons, even if one test shows a significant p-value, it doesn't guarantee that the result is not due to random chance.
  • Hypothesis testing involves assessing the probability of observing results if a null hypothesis were true.
  • Care should be taken, especially with multiple tests, to adjust for potential false positives.
  • It's a cornerstone of statistical analysis, helping ensure findings are statistically grounded.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 4.16 on page 268 , we describe an observational study investigating a possible relationship between exposure to organophosphate pesticides as measured in urinary metabolites (DAP) and diagnosis of ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). In reporting the results of this study, the authors \(^{28}\) make the following statements: \- "The threshold for statistical significance was set at \(P<.05 . "\) \- "The odds of meeting the \(\ldots\) criteria for \(\mathrm{ADHD}\) increased with the urinary concentrations of total DAP metabolites" \- "The association was statistically significant." (a) What can we conclude about the p-value obtained in analyzing the data? (b) Based on these statements, can we distinguish whether the evidence of association is very strong vs moderately strong? Why or why not? (c) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides is related to the likelihood of an ADHD diagnosis? (d) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides causes more cases of ADHD? Why or why not?

Exercises 4.29 on page 271 and 4.76 on page 287 describe a historical scenario in which a British woman, Muriel BristolRoach, claimed to be able to tell whether milk had been poured into a cup before or after the tea. An experiment was conducted in which Muriel was presented with 8 cups of tea, and asked to guess whether the milk or tea was poured first. Our null hypothesis \(\left(H_{0}\right)\) is that Muriel has no ability to tell whether the milk was poured first. We would like to create a randomization distribution for \(\hat{p},\) the proportion of cups out of 8 that Muriel guesses correctly under \(H_{0}\). Describe a possible approach to generate randomization samples for each of the following scenarios: (a) Muriel does not know beforehand how many cups have milk poured first. (b) Muriel knows that 4 cups will have milk poured first and 4 will have tea poured first.

The consumption of caffeine to benefit alertness is a common activity practiced by \(90 \%\) of adults in North America. Often caffeine is used in order to replace the need for sleep. One study \(^{24}\) compares students' ability to recall memorized information after either the consumption of caffeine or a brief sleep. A random sample of 35 adults (between the ages of 18 and 39 ) were randomly divided into three groups and verbally given a list of 24 words to memorize. During a break, one of the groups takes a nap for an hour and a half, another group is kept awake and then given a caffeine pill an hour prior to testing, and the third group is given a placebo. The response variable of interest is the number of words participants are able to recall following the break. The summary statistics for the three groups are in Table 4.9. We are interested in testing whether there is evidence of a difference in average recall ability between any two of the treatments. Thus we have three possible tests between different pairs of groups: Sleep vs Caffeine, Sleep vs Placebo, and Caffeine vs Placebo. (a) In the test comparing the sleep group to the caffeine group, the p-value is \(0.003 .\) What is the conclusion of the test? In the sample, which group had better recall ability? According to the test results, do you think sleep is really better than caffeine for recall ability? (b) In the test comparing the sleep group to the placebo group, the p-value is 0.06 . What is the conclusion of the test using a \(5 \%\) significance level? If we use a \(10 \%\) significance level? How strong is the evidence of a difference in mean recall ability between these two treatments? (c) In the test comparing the caffeine group to the placebo group, the p-value is 0.22 . What is the conclusion of the test? In the sample, which group had better recall ability? According to the test results, would we be justified in concluding that caffeine impairs recall ability? (d) According to this study, what should you do before an exam that asks you to recall information?

Data 4.3 on page 265 discusses a test to determine if the mean level of arsenic in chicken meat is above 80 ppb. If a restaurant chain finds significant evidence that the mean arsenic level is above \(80,\) the chain will stop using that supplier of chicken meat. The hypotheses are $$ \begin{array}{ll} H_{0}: & \mu=80 \\ H_{a}: & \mu>80 \end{array} $$ where \(\mu\) represents the mean arsenic level in all chicken meat from that supplier. Samples from two different suppliers are analyzed, and the resulting p-values are given: Sample from Supplier A: p-value is 0.0003 Sample from Supplier B: p-value is 0.3500 (a) Interpret each p-value in terms of the probability of the results happening by random chance. (b) Which p-value shows stronger evidence for the alternative hypothesis? What does this mean in terms of arsenic and chickens? (c) Which supplier, \(A\) or \(B\), should the chain get chickens from in order to avoid too high a level of arsenic?

In Exercise 3.89 on page \(239,\) we found a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion of rats showing compassion, using the proportion of female rats minus the proportion of male rats, to be 0.104 to \(0.480 .\) In testing whether there is a difference in these two proportions: (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using the confidence interval, what is the conclusion of the test? Include an indication of the significance level. (c) Based on this study would you say that female rats or male rats are more likely to show compassion (or are the results inconclusive)?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Geometry

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.