/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 182 Exercises 4.29 on page 271 and 4... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercises 4.29 on page 271 and 4.76 on page 287 describe a historical scenario in which a British woman, Muriel BristolRoach, claimed to be able to tell whether milk had been poured into a cup before or after the tea. An experiment was conducted in which Muriel was presented with 8 cups of tea, and asked to guess whether the milk or tea was poured first. Our null hypothesis \(\left(H_{0}\right)\) is that Muriel has no ability to tell whether the milk was poured first. We would like to create a randomization distribution for \(\hat{p},\) the proportion of cups out of 8 that Muriel guesses correctly under \(H_{0}\). Describe a possible approach to generate randomization samples for each of the following scenarios: (a) Muriel does not know beforehand how many cups have milk poured first. (b) Muriel knows that 4 cups will have milk poured first and 4 will have tea poured first.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For scenario (a), when Muriel doesn't know how many cups have milk poured first, we use a binomial distribution with \(n=8, p=0.5\) to generate random set of 8 guesses. For scenario (b), when she knows that 4 cups have milk poured first, we create randomization samples by considering all combinations of 4 cups having milk first and assigning them equal probabilities.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

Here we have a statistical problem involving the null hypothesis and randomization distribution. Muriel claims to guess whether milk has been poured before or after tea in a cup. Our null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is that Muriel has no special ability, i.e., her guesses are merely by chance like toss of a fair coin. We are asked to describe approaches to generate randomization samples if she does not know or knows how many cups have milk poured first.
02

Scenario (a) Solution

When Muriel does not know beforehand how many cups have milk poured first, we can model the situation as a series of 8 binomial trials since each cup can be considered as a separate trial. Under \(H_{0}\), the probability of her guessing correctly is 0.5 (since her guesses are as good as random). A randomization sample can be created by generating a set of 8 random guesses using a binomial distribution with \(n=8, p=0.5\).
03

Scenario (b) Solution

When Muriel is aware that 4 cups will have milk poured first, we may conduct a slightly different approach. The total possible outcomes where 4 cups have milk poured first and 4 have tea poured first is \(\binom{8}{4}\). We can create a randomization sample by considering all these combinations and assigning them equal probabilities. We then draw samples from this distribution to derive our randomization samples.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Null Hypothesis in Statistics
The null hypothesis is a foundational concept in statistics, generally denoted as \(H_0\). It represents a default position that there is no effect or no difference in a particular situation. When conducting experiments or tests, such as the one involving Muriel Bristol-Roach's tea-tasting abilities, we start by assuming the null hypothesis is true—in this case, that Muriel cannot distinguish whether milk was poured before or after the tea better than random guessing.

To test this hypothesis, we would compare the results of Muriel's guesses to what we would expect to happen purely by chance. If her success rate is significantly greater than chance, we may have evidence to reject the null hypothesis. However, without a significantly high success rate, we would not reject \(H_0\), which means we don't have enough evidence to conclude that Muriel truly has the claimed ability.
Randomization Distribution Explained
A randomization distribution is a statistical tool that helps us understand what the results of an experiment might look like under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. It represents the distribution of possible outcomes we could expect from random chance alone.

For Muriel's case, creating a randomization distribution under scenario (a) would involve simulating the process of her guessing without knowledge of how many cups had milk poured first. This could be done by generating many sets of 8 random guesses, calculating the proportion of correct guesses in each set, and then plotting these proportions to see the distribution. Such a distribution would give us a sense of how often we could expect certain results if Muriel were guessing randomly.

Under scenario (b), where Muriel knows 4 cups will have milk poured first, we build a randomization distribution that accounts for this knowledge. By recognizing there are \(\binom{8}{4}\) ways to pour the milk, we would simulate guesses across all these combinations to create the distribution. This helps us assess Muriel's ability against a more informed random guessing baseline.
The Role of Binomial Distribution
Binomial distribution is highly relevant in the context of Muriel's tea-tasting experiment. It describes the number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials, with the same probability of success on each trial. If guessing correctly is considered a 'success' and guessing incorrectly is a 'failure', then the number of correct guesses follows a binomial distribution if each guess is independent and the probability of success is constant.

In scenario (a), Muriel's task involves 8 independent trials (the 8 cups of tea), with two possible outcomes for each trial: a correct guess or an incorrect guess. If we assume that her probability of making a correct guess is 0.5 (because we assume she is guessing randomly under the null hypothesis), the situation can be modeled using a binomial distribution with \(n=8\) and \(p=0.5\).

This distribution allows us to calculate probabilities for different numbers of correct guesses out of the 8 trials. For example, the probability of guessing all 8 correctly or none at all by chance can be computed using the binomial probability formula. Understanding these probabilities and how they contribute to the randomization distribution is crucial in determining whether Muriel's claimed ability is legitimate or not.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mating Choice and Offspring Fitness: MiniExperiments Exercise 4.153 explores the question of whether mate choice improves offspring fitness in fruit flies, and describes two seemingly identical experiments yielding conflicting results (one significant, one insignificant). In fact, the second source was actually a series of three different experiments, and each full experiment was comprised of 50 different mini-experiments (runs), 10 each on five different days. (a) Suppose each of the 50 mini-experiments from the first study were analyzed individually. If mating choice has no impact on offspring fitness, about how many of these \(50 \mathrm{p}\) -values would you expect to yield significant results at \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) (b) The 50 p-values, testing the alternative \(H_{a}\) : \(p_{C}>p_{N C}\) (proportion of flies surviving is higher in the mate choice group) are given below: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} \text { Day 1: } & 0.96 & 0.85 & 0.14 & 0.54 & 0.76 & 0.98 & 0.33 & 0.84 & 0.21 & 0.89 \\ \text { Day 2: } & 0.89 & 0.66 & 0.67 & 0.88 & 1.00 & 0.01 & 1.00 & 0.77 & 0.95 & 0.27 \\ \text { Day 3: } & 0.58 & 0.11 & 0.02 & 0.00 & 0.62 & 0.01 & 0.79 & 0.08 & 0.96 & 0.00 \\ \text { Day 4: } & 0.89 & 0.13 & 0.34 & 0.18 & 0.11 & 0.66 & 0.01 & 0.31 & 0.69 & 0.19 \\ \text { Day 5: } & 0.42 & 0.06 & 0.31 & 0.24 & 0.24 & 0.16 & 0.17 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.11 \end{array} $$ How many are actually significant using \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) (c) You may notice that two p-values (the fourth and last run on day 3 ) are 0.00 when rounded to two decimal places. The second of these is actually 0.0001 if we report more decimal places. This is very significant! Would it be appropriate and/or ethical to just report this one run, yielding highly statistically significant evidence that mate choice improves offspring fitness? Explain. (d) You may also notice that two of the p-values on day 2 are 1 (rounded to two decimal places). If we had been testing the opposite alternative, \(H_{a}:\) \(p_{C}

Utilizing the census of a community, which includes information about all residents of the community, to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater than \(10 \%\).

We are conducting many hypothesis tests to test a claim. In every case, assume that the null hypothesis is true. Approximately how many of the tests will incorrectly find significance? 40 tests using a significance level of \(10 \%\).

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) (a) 95\% confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.53\) to 0.57 (b) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.41\) to 0.52 (c) 99\% confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.35\) to 0.55

Exercises 4.59 to 4.64 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=30 / 50=0.60\) with \(n=50\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.