/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 A situation is described for a s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if there is evidence that the mean time spent studying per week is different between first-year students and upperclass students.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Parameters are the mean time spent studying per week for first-year students (\( \mu_1 \)) and upperclass students (\( \mu_2 \)). The null hypothesis (H0) is \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \) and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Define Parameters

Let \( \mu_1 \) represent the mean study time per week for first-year students and \( \mu_2 \) the mean study time per week for upperclass students. These are the parameters this statistical test will be conducted upon.
02

Constructing Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that there is no difference between the two population means, so it's defined as: \( H0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \), which indicates that the mean study time of first-year students is the same as the upperclass students.
03

Constructing Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis (H1) is the contrary to the null hypothesis. It states that there is a difference between the two population means. So, it's defined as: \( H1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0 \), suggesting the mean study time for first-year students is not the same as for the upperclass students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Understanding the null and alternative hypotheses is critical in statistical hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis, denoted as H0, is a statement of no effect or no difference. It serves as a starting point and suggests that any observed variation is due to chance. For our exercise regarding study times, the null hypothesis posits that the average study time per week for first-year and upperclass students is exactly the same, mathematically expressed as H0: \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \).

In contrast, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as H1 or Ha, is a statement that indicates the presence of an effect or a significant difference. The alternative hypothesis for the exercise challenges the null, suggesting the study times differ between the two groups, formalized as H1: \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 eq 0 \). It's essentially what we aim to support or find evidence for during our testing.

Choosing the correct null and alternative hypotheses sets the stage for determining the appropriateness of the test and the interpretation of the results. They are mutually exclusive and together cover all possible scenarios.
Mean Comparison
Statistical tests often involve mean comparison, comparing the average values from two or more groups to draw conclusions. In the exercise, we're comparing the mean study times (\( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) for the first-year and upperclass students, respectively) to see if any significant difference exists between them. The paired differences \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) is the focus of this exercise.

Mean comparison can be performed with various statistical tests such as t-tests, ANOVA, or Z-tests, depending on parameters like sample size, variance, and the underlying distribution of the data. Each test has its assumptions and conditions for applicability. This scenario seems to imply a two-sample t-test, used to compare two separate group means assuming data follows a roughly normal distribution when samples are small and variance is unknown.

Significance Level and Decision

While performing a mean comparison, we choose a significance level (usually 0.05) that determines how extreme the data must be for us to reject the null hypothesis. If the observed differences in means are deemed statistically significant, we may conclude that the study times are, in fact, different. Otherwise, we lack evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Statistical Parameters
In the context of our statistical test, statistical parameters are numerical characteristics that define and describe aspects of a population. Parameters are the building blocks for our hypotheses. For instance, \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) in the exercise represent the population means for the first-year and upperclass student's study time respectively.

Identifying and defining the right parameters is crucial; they summarize key features of a population, such as location (mean), spread (variance, standard deviation), and shape (skewness, kurtosis). These numbers provide a standardized way to describe and make inferences about populations based on sample data.

Parameter Estimation

Since we often cannot measure every individual in a population, we use sample data to estimate these parameters. Such estimations come with a degree of uncertainty, measured and communicated through confidence intervals and standard errors. Understanding statistical parameters is fundamental in hypothesis testing as they form the basis upon which we compare, infer, and draw conclusions about wider populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How influenced are consumers by price and marketing? If something costs more, do our expectations lead us to believe it is better? Because expectations play such a large role in reality, can a product that costs more (but is in reality identical) actually be more effective? Baba Shiv, a neuroeconomist at Stanford, conducted a study \(^{25}\) involving 204 undergraduates. In the study, all students consumed a popular energy drink which claims on its packaging to increase mental acuity. The students were then asked to solve a series of puzzles. The students were charged either regular price ( \(\$ 1.89\) ) for the drink or a discount price \((\$ 0.89)\). The students receiving the discount price were told that they were able to buy the drink at a discount since the drinks had been purchased in bulk. The authors of the study describe the results: "the number of puzzles solved was lower in the reduced-price condition \((M=4.2)\) than in the regular-price condition \((M=5.8) \ldots p<.0001 . "\) (a) What can you conclude from the study? How strong is the evidence for the conclusion? (b) These results have been replicated in many similar studies. As Jonah Lehrer tells us: "According to Shiv, a kind of placebo effect is at work. Since we expect cheaper goods to be less effective, they generally are less effective, even if they are identical to more expensive products. This is why brand-name aspirin works better than generic aspirin and why Coke tastes better than cheaper colas, even if most consumers can't tell the difference in blind taste tests."26 Discuss the implications of this research in marketing and pricing.

Do you think that students undergo physiological changes when in potentially stressful situations such as taking a quiz or exam? A sample of statistics students were interrupted in the middle of a quiz and asked to record their pulse rates (beats for a 1-minute period). Ten of the students had also measured their pulse rate while sitting in class listening to a lecture, and these values were matched with their quiz pulse rates. The data appear in Table 4.18 and are stored in QuizPulse10. Note that this is paired data since we have two values, a quiz and a lecture pulse rate, for each student in the sample. The question of interest is whether quiz pulse rates tend to be higher, on average, than lecture pulse rates. (Hint: Since this is paired data, we work with the differences in pulse rate for each student between quiz and lecture. If the differences are \(D=\) quiz pulse rate minus lecture pulse rate, the question of interest is whether \(\mu_{D}\) is greater than zero.) Table 4.18 Quiz and Lecture pulse rates for I0 students $$\begin{array}{lcccccccccc} \text { Student } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \hline \text { Quiz } & 75 & 52 & 52 & 80 & 56 & 90 & 76 & 71 & 70 & 66 \\\ \text { Lecture } & 73 & 53 & 47 & 88 & 55 & 70 & 61 & 75 & 61 & 78 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) Define the parameter(s) of interest and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Determine an appropriate statistic to measure and compute its value for the original sample. (c) Describe a method to generate randomization samples that is consistent with the null hypothesis and reflects the paired nature of the data. There are several viable methods. You might use shuffled index cards, a coin, or some other randomization procedure. (d) Carry out your procedure to generate one randomization sample and compute the statistic you chose in part (b) for this sample. (e) Is the statistic for your randomization sample more extreme (in the direction of the alternative) than the original sample?

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Using a sample of 10 games each to see if your average score at Wii bowling is significantly more than your friend's average score.

Giving a Coke/Pepsi taste test to random people in New York City to determine if there is evidence for the claim that Pepsi is preferred.

After exercise, massage is often used to relieve pain, and a recent study 33 shows that it also may relieve inflammation and help muscles heal. In the study, 11 male participants who had just strenuously exercised had 10 minutes of massage on one quadricep and no treatment on the other, with treatment randomly assigned. After 2.5 hours, muscle biopsies were taken and production of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 was measured relative to the resting level. The differences (control minus massage) are given in Table 4.11 . $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} 0.6 & 4.7 & 3.8 & 0.4 & 1.5 & -1.2 & 2.8 & -0.4 & 1.4 & 3.5 & -2.8 \end{array} $$ (a) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why is it not double blind? (b) What is the sample mean difference in inflammation between no massage and massage? (c) We want to test to see if the population mean difference \(\mu_{D}\) is greater than zero, meaning muscle with no treatment has more inflammation than muscle that has been massaged. State the null and alternative hypotheses. (d) Use Statkey or other technology to find the p-value from a randomization distribution. (e) Are the results significant at a \(5 \%\) level? At a \(1 \%\) level? State the conclusion of the test if we assume a \(5 \%\) significance level (as the authors of the study did).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.