/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 135 For each situation described, in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Using a sample of 10 games each to see if your average score at Wii bowling is significantly more than your friend's average score.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this context, it would make more sense to use a relatively large significance level, such as \(\alpha = 0.10\).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the context

We're investigating whether the average score in Wii bowling is significantly more than the friend's average score. Therefore, it's a friendly competition and the truth of whether one person scores higher on average does not have serious real-world consequences.
02

Assess the potential consequences of a false positive result

Here, falsely deciding that your score is higher on average (a false positive) would only result in a minor mishap, as it only concerns a friendly competition. No one would be terribly hurt by it.
03

Decide the appropriate significance level

Given that the potential consequences of a false positive result are minor, it is less crucial to require a lot of evidence before deciding that your score is higher on average. Therefore, it would make more sense to use a relatively large significance level, such as \(\alpha = 0.10\), as it requires less evidence to reject the null hypothesis (your friend's average score is the same or more than yours).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a critical component of statistics that helps us decide if there is enough data to support a specific belief or hypothesis. In any hypothesis test, you start by posing two opposite statements: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. Here's how it generally works:

The **Null Hypothesis** (\( H_0 \)) is a statement that there is no effect or no difference. It serves as the starting point for statistical testing, meant to be maintained until evidence suggests otherwise. In our example, the null hypothesis would be that there is no significant difference between your average Wii bowling score and your friend's.

The **Alternative Hypothesis** (\( H_a \)) is what you want to prove. It's the statement that there is indeed an effect or difference. Here, it would be that your average score is higher than your friend's.

After collecting and analyzing your data, the hypothesis test tells you if there is enough statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. This process involves a significance level, which influences how confident we can be in our results.
False Positive
A false positive in hypothesis testing occurs when the test incorrectly indicates that a condition has been met when it hasn't. Think of it like a false alarm.

In simpler terms, a false positive would mean rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Focusing on our Wii bowling example:
  • A false positive would mean concluding that your average score is significantly higher than your friend's, when it actually isn't. It's as if the test incorrectly "calls it" like you getting all strikes when you just rolled some spares.
  • These errors happen because we rely on sample data, which can sometimes lead us to incorrect conclusions due to random chance.
False positives are important to consider because the significance level you choose directly affects the likelihood of these errors. A higher significance level (\( \alpha = 0.10 \)) increases the chance of a false positive, while a smaller one (\( \alpha = 0.01 \)) decreases it.

In scenarios where the consequences of a false positive are not severe, like our friendly Wii game, a higher significance level is more acceptable.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing. It acts as the default or neutral statement that you seek to test against. In our Wii bowling case, the null hypothesis would state that there is no significant difference in average scores between you and your friend.

Whenever conducting a hypothesis test, you initially assume that the null hypothesis is true. This assumption sets the stage for statistical testing by providing a baseline.

The goal of hypothesis testing is to determine whether your data provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)). If you have substantial evidence, you can confidently refute the null hypothesis.

It's crucial to understand that "rejecting" the null doesn't mean proving it wrong beyond any doubt but rather, it implies that there is strong statistical evidence supporting the alternative.
  • During tests, we set a significance level, which dictates how rigorous we should be before rejecting the null.
  • A large significance level, like \( \alpha = 0.10 \), means you'll need less evidence to override the null, useful in low-risk situations.
In our playful example with Wii bowling, using a larger significance level is acceptable because the stakes are low, and you don’t need overwhelming proof to sport bragging rights!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Testing a new drug with potentially dangerous side effects to see if it is significantly better than the drug currently in use. If it is found to be more effective, it will be prescribed to millions of people.

Test \(\mathrm{A}\) is described in a journal article as being significant with " \(P<.01\) "; Test \(\mathrm{B}\) in the same article is described as being significant with " \(P<\).10." Using only this information, which test would you suspect provides stronger evidence for its alternative hypothesis?

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if average sales are higher in stores where customers are approached by salespeople than in stores where they aren't.

An article noted that it may be possible to accurately predict which way a penalty-shot kicker in soccer will direct his shot. \({ }^{27}\) The study finds that certain types of body language by a soccer player \(-\) called "tells"-can be accurately read to predict whether the ball will go left or right. For a given body movement leading up to the kick, the question is whether there is strong evidence that the proportion of kicks that go right is significantly different from one-half. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses in this situation? (b) If sample results for one type of body movement give a p-value of 0.3184 , what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement? (c) If sample results for a different type of body movement give a p-value of \(0.0006,\) what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement?

The Ignorance Surveys were conducted in 2013 using random sampling methods in four different countries under the leadership of Hans Rosling, a Swedish statistician and international health advocate. The survey questions were designed to assess the ignorance of the public to global population trends. The survey was not just designed to measure ignorance (no information), but if preconceived notions can lead to more wrong answers than would be expected by random guessing. One question asked, "In the last 20 years the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has \(\ldots, "\) and three choices were provided: 1) "almost doubled" 2) "remained more or less the same," and 3) "almost halved." Of 1005 US respondents, just \(5 \%\) gave the correct answer: "almost halved." 34 We would like to test if the percent of correct choices is significantly different than what would be expected if the participants were just randomly guessing between the three choices. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using StatKey or other technology, construct a randomization distribution and compute the p-value. (c) State the conclusion in context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.