/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 99 In a test to see whether there i... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a test to see whether there is a difference between males and females in average nasal tip angle, the study indicates that " \(p>0.05\)."

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given p-value of \(p > 0.05\), there is not a significant difference in the average nasal tip angle between males and females.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the use of P-value

In hypothesis testing, a p-value is used to decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis could state that there is no difference between male and female average nasal tip angles.
02

Interpreting the given p-value

The p-value of \(p>0.05\) indicates a weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between male and female average nasal tip angles.
03

Conclusion from the analysis

This means that according to the study, there is not a significant difference in the average nasal tip angle between males and females.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental concept in statistics used for hypothesis testing. It's a statement that there is no effect or no difference between groups or variables being studied. In the context of the nasal tip angle study, the null hypothesis might be that there is no significant difference in the average nasal tip angle between males and females. It serves as a starting point for statistical testing.

When researchers conduct an experiment or study, they begin by assuming that the null hypothesis is true. This assumption sets the stage for either proving some difference or effect exists or for supporting that there is indeed no apparent difference or effect between the groups under investigation.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a term used to determine if the results of a study or an experiment are not due to random chance. It's often assessed with a p-value, which quantifies the probability of observing the results if the null hypothesis were true. A commonly used threshold to determine statistical significance is a p-value of 0.05 or 5%.

If the p-value is less than or equal to 0.05, the results are typically considered statistically significant, meaning that they are unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This would typically lead to rejecting the null hypothesis. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than 0.05, as it is in the nasal tip angle study, the evidence is not strong enough to rule out the possibility that the observed results are due to random variation, thus the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used to make decisions about populations based on sample data. It's a core technique in statistical analysis where you test an assumption (the null hypothesis) about a population parameter. The p-value forms an integral part of this method, helping to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

The process typically includes the following steps: define the null and alternative hypotheses, decide on a significance level (such as 0.05), calculate the p-value using a statistical test, and conclude whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis based on this p-value. In our nasal tip angle study, the hypothesis testing process led to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis given the p-value being greater than 0.05.
Nasal Tip Angle Study
In medical or biological studies, researchers might be interested in features such as the nasal tip angle because it can have implications in reconstructive surgery, aesthetic assessments, or evolutionary biology. The nasal tip angle study referenced here appears to be an investigation into potential differences in this physical characteristic between males and females.

For this study, the researchers would have measured the nasal tip angles in a sample of male and female subjects, and then applied a statistical test to determine whether the differences observed are statistically significant. The outcome of the study indicated a p-value greater than 0.05, which suggests that there isn't a strong enough evidence to say that the average nasal tip angle differs between males and females.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

After exercise, massage is often used to relieve pain, and a recent study 33 shows that it also may relieve inflammation and help muscles heal. In the study, 11 male participants who had just strenuously exercised had 10 minutes of massage on one quadricep and no treatment on the other, with treatment randomly assigned. After 2.5 hours, muscle biopsies were taken and production of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 was measured relative to the resting level. The differences (control minus massage) are given in Table 4.11 . $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} 0.6 & 4.7 & 3.8 & 0.4 & 1.5 & -1.2 & 2.8 & -0.4 & 1.4 & 3.5 & -2.8 \end{array} $$ (a) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why is it not double blind? (b) What is the sample mean difference in inflammation between no massage and massage? (c) We want to test to see if the population mean difference \(\mu_{D}\) is greater than zero, meaning muscle with no treatment has more inflammation than muscle that has been massaged. State the null and alternative hypotheses. (d) Use Statkey or other technology to find the p-value from a randomization distribution. (e) Are the results significant at a \(5 \%\) level? At a \(1 \%\) level? State the conclusion of the test if we assume a \(5 \%\) significance level (as the authors of the study did).

Does the airline you choose affect when you'll arrive at your destination? The dataset DecemberFlights contains the difference between actual and scheduled arrival time from 1000 randomly sampled December flights for two of the major North American airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines. A negative difference indicates a flight arrived early. We are interested in testing whether the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is different between the two airlines. (a) Define any relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Find the sample mean of each group, and calculate the difference in sample means. (c) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution and find the p-value. (d) At a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\), what is the conclusion of the test? Interpret the conclusion in context.

Studies have shown that omega-3 fatty acids have a wide variety of health benefits. Omega- 3 oils can be found in foods such as fish, walnuts, and flaxseed. A company selling milled flaxseed advertises that one tablespoon of the product contains, on average, at least \(3800 \mathrm{mg}\) of ALNA, the primary omega-3. (a) The company plans to conduct a test to ensure that there is sufficient evidence that its claim is correct. To be safe, the company wants to make sure that evidence shows the average is higher than \(3800 \mathrm{mg} .\) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Suppose, instead, that a consumer organization plans to conduct a test to see if there is evidence against the claim that the product contains an average of \(3800 \mathrm{mg}\) per tablespoon. The consumer organization will only take action if it finds evidence that the claim made by the company is false and that the actual average amount of omega- 3 is less than \(3800 \mathrm{mg}\). What are the null and alternative hypotheses?

Interpreting a P-value In each case, indicate whether the statement is a proper interpretation of what a p-value measures. (a) The probability the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (b) The probability that the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true. (c) The probability of seeing data as extreme as the sample, when the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (d) The probability of making a Type I error if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is true. (e) The probability of making a Type II error if the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}\) is true.

Mating Choice and Offspring Fitness Does the ability to choose a mate improve offspring fitness in fruit flies? Researchers have studied this by taking female fruit flies and randomly dividing them into two groups; one group is put into a cage with a large number of males and able to freely choose who to mate with, while flies in the other group are each put into individual vials, each with only one male, giving no choice in who to mate with. Females are then put into egg laying chambers, and a certain number of larvae collected. Do the larvae from the mate choice group exhibit higher survival rates? A study \(^{44}\) published in Nature found that mate choice does increase offspring fitness in fruit flies (with p-value \(<0.02\) ), yet this result went against conventional wisdom in genetics and was quite controversial. Researchers attempted to replicate this result with a series of related experiments, \({ }^{45}\) with data provided in MateChoice. (a) In the first replication experiment, using the same species of fruit fly as the original Nature study, 6067 of the 10000 larvae from the mate choice group survived and 5976 of the 10000 larvae from the no mate choice group survived. Calculate the p-value. (b) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and \(\mathrm{p}\) -value from (a), state the conclusion in context. (c) Actually, the 10,000 larvae in each group came from a series of 50 different runs of the experiment, with 200 larvae in each group for each run. The researchers believe that conditions dif- fer from run to run, and thus it makes sense to treat each \(\mathrm{run}\) as a case (rather than each fly). In this analysis, we are looking at paired data, and the response variable would be the difference in the number of larvae surviving between the choice group and the no choice group, for each of the 50 runs. The counts (Choice and NoChoice and difference (Choice \(-\) NoChoice) in number of surviving larva are stored in MateChoice. Using the single variable of differences, calculate the p-value for testing whether the average difference is greater than \(0 .\) (Hint: this is a single quantitative variable, so the corresponding test would be for a single mean.) (d) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and the p-value from (c), state the conclusion in context. (e) The experiment being tested in parts (a)-(d) was designed to mimic the experiment from the original study, yet the original study yielded significant results while this study did not. If mate choice really does improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the follow-up study being analyzed in parts (a)-(d) make a Type I, Type II, or no error? (f) If mate choice really does not improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the original Nature study make a Type I, Type II, or no error?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.