/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 218 The Honeybee dataset contains da... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Honeybee dataset contains data collected from the USDA on the estimated number of honeybee colonies (in thousands) for the years 1995 through 2012.77 We use technology to find that a regression line to predict number of (thousand) colonies from year (in calendar year) is $$\text { Colonies }=19,291,511-8.358(\text { Year })$$ (a) Interpret the slope of the line in context. (b) Often researchers will adjust a year explanatory variable such that it represents years since the first year data were colleected. Why might they do this? (Hint: Consider interpreting the yintercept in this regression line.) (c) Predict the bee population in \(2100 .\) Is this prediction appropriate (why or why not)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The slope represents the rate of decrease in honeybee colonies each year. Researchers might adjust the year variable for a meaningful interpretation of the y-intercept. The prediction for the bee population in 2100 according to this regression model is not appropriate as it predicts negative number of colonies and assumes invariant rate of decrease over a long period, which is unlikely.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret the Slope

The slope of the regression line is -8.358. In the context of this problem, this means that the number of honeybee colonies decreases by 8.358 thousand each year, according to the model.
02

Why Adjust the Year Explanatory Variable

The year explanatory variable represents the calendar year. Adjusting it to represent years since the first year data were collected can be beneficial because it can provide a more meaningful interpretation of the y-intercept. In this regression line, the y-intercept is 19,291,511 but this doesn't have a meaningful interpretation since there weren't any year 0. If we adjust the year explanatory variable, the y-intercept would represent the estimated number of colonies at the start of the data collection.
03

Predict the Bee Population in 2100

To predict the bee population in 2100, plug 2100 into the regression equation to get \(Colonies = 19,291,511 - 8.358(2100) = -15244989\) thousand colonies. However, this prediction is not appropriate. The linear regression model assumes the same rate of decrease in colony size every year, which is unlikely to hold true over a span of many decades. The model also predicts negative colony sizes, which is nonsensical.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Interpreting Slope
When examining the relationship between two variables in a linear regression, the slope is central to understanding how they interact. In the case of the Honeybee dataset, the slope of the regression line is -8.358. This figure carries significant meaning; it represents the rate at which honeybee colonies (in thousands) decrease for every one-unit increase in the year. To put it simply, each passing year is associated with a loss of approximately 8.358 thousand colonies.

Understanding the slope allows researchers and policymakers to gauge the severity of the decline in honeybee populations and to project future trends. However, while the negative slope presents a clear downward trend, it's crucial to consider the broader context. This slope is based on historical data and assumes that the factors affecting honeybee populations remain constant, which is rarely the case in complex ecological systems.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a powerful statistical tool used to model and analyze the relationships between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. The goal is to fit a 'best' linear equation that explains how the independent variable(s) influence the dependent variable. For the Honeybee dataset, the linear equation provided is \( \text{Colonies} = 19,291,511 - 8.358(\text{Year}) \).

The equation includes a y-intercept (19,291,511) and a slope (-8.358), where the y-intercept represents the estimated number of colonies at the start of the dataset (which, without adjusting the year variable, would nonsensically point to a year 0). Adapting the year variable to count years since data collection began can clarify the y-intercept's practical significance, portraying it as the initial honeybee population at the first year of observation.

While linear regression is straightforward and informative, the simplicity of its model can also be a limitation. It may not capture the nuances of complex situations where the relationship between variables isn't consistent or linear over time.
Predictive Modeling
Predictive modeling involves using statistical techniques, such as regression analysis, to create a model that can forecast future events or trends. The predictability depends on the quality of the data, the appropriateness of the model, and the assumption that current patterns will continue into the future. With the Honeybee dataset regression equation, a prediction was made for the bee population in the year 2100. Using the given formula resulted in a negative number of colonies, which obviously cannot occur in reality.

As with all models, there are limitations. This example highlights the risks of extrapolation—making predictions far outside the range of the data on which the model was initially based. Over time, many factors can change, altering the relationship between the investigated variables. Moreover, linear models have their shortcomings, as they cannot account for nonlinear trends or abrupt shifts in data. Therefore, while predictive modeling is an essential part of data analysis and decision-making, the results need to be treated with caution, especially when predicting far into the future or when the model is a simplification of a more complex reality.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cloud Cover in San Francisco-Online The plots in Exercise 2.258 on cloud cover in San Francisco can be found online at weatherlines. zanarmstrong.com if you prefer Figure \(2.99(\mathrm{a})\) or weather.zanarmstrong.com if you prefer Figure \(2.99(\mathrm{~b}) .\) In the interactive display you can hover over points to get more information. You can also click on the map to change the city or the drop down menu to change the weather statistic that is plotted. Use the interactive plots at this website to answer the questions below. (a) In San Francisco, approximately what time of day has the highest percent cloud cover in August? (b) Which season tends to be the least windy for Chicago (the "Windy City")?

Exercises 2.137 to 2.140 each describe a sample. The information given includes the five number summary, the sample size, and the largest and smallest data values in the tails of the distribution. In each case: (a) Clearly identify any outliers, using the IQR method. (b) Draw a boxplot. Five number summary: \((210,260,270,300,\) 320)\(; n=500\) Tails: \(210,215,217,221,225, \ldots, 318,319,319,319,\) 320,320

Arsenic in Toenails Arsenic is toxic to humans, and people can be exposed to it through contaminated drinking water, food, dust, and soil. Scientists have devised an interesting new way to measure a person's level of arsenic poisoning: by examining toenail clippings. In a recent study, \(, 9\) scientists measured the level of arsenic (in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg}\) ) in toenail clippings of eight people who lived near a former arsenic mine in Great Britain. The following levels were recorded: \(\begin{array}{llllll}0.8 & 1.9 & 2.7 & 3.4 & 3.9 & 7.1\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ll}11.9 & 26.0\end{array}\) (a) Do you expect the mean or the median of these toenail arsenic levels to be larger? Why? (b) Calculate the mean and the median. 2.62 Fiber in the Diet The number of grams of fiber eaten in one day for a sample of ten people are \(\begin{array}{ll}10 & 11\end{array}\) \(11 \quad 14\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}15 & 17 & 21 & 24 & 28 & 115\end{array}\) (a) Find the mean and the median for these data. (b) The value of 115 appears to be an obvious outlier. Compute the mean and the median for the nine numbers with the outlier excluded. (c) Comment on the effect of the outlier on the mean and on the median.

If we have learned to solve problems by one method, we often have difficulty bringing new insight to similar problems. However, electrical stimulation of the brain appears to help subjects come up with fresh insight. In a recent experiment \({ }^{17}\) conducted at the University of Sydney in Australia, 40 participants were trained to solve problems in a certain way and then asked to solve an unfamiliar problem that required fresh insight. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive non-invasive electrical stimulation of the brain while the other half (control group) received sham stimulation as a placebo. The participants did not know which group they were in. In the control group, \(20 \%\) of the participants successfully solved the problem while \(60 \%\) of the participants who received brain stimulation solved the problem. (a) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. (b) From the description, does it appear that the study is double-blind, single-blind, or not blind? (c) What are the variables? Indicate whether each is categorical or quantitative. (d) Make a two-way table of the data. (e) What percent of the people who correctly solved the problem had the electrical stimulation? (f) Give values for \(\hat{p}_{E},\) the proportion of people in the electrical stimulation group to solve the problem, and \(\hat{p}_{S},\) the proportion of people in the sham stimulation group to solve the problem. What is the difference in proportions \(\hat{p}_{E}-\hat{p}_{S} ?\) (g) Does electrical stimulation of the brain appear to help insight?

Give the correct notation for the mean. The average number of television sets owned per household for all households in the US is 2.6 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.