/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 217 Using 10 years of National Footb... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Using 10 years of National Football League (NFL) data, we calculate the following regression line to predict regular season wins (Wins) by number of wins in the 4 pre-season games (PreSeason): \(\widehat{\text { Wins }}=7.5+0.2(\) PreSeason \()\) (a) Which is the explanatory variable, and which is the response variable in this regression line? (b) How many wins does the regression line predict for a team that won 2 games in pre-season? (c) What is the slope of the line? Interpret it in context. (d) What is the intercept of the line? If it is reasonable to do so, interpret it in context. If it is not reasonable, explain why not. (e) How many regular season wins does the regression line predict for a team that wins 100 preseason games? Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The explanatory variable is 'PreSeason' and the response variable is 'Wins'. A team that won 2 preseason games is expected to win approximately 8 regular season games. The slope of the line is 0.2, suggesting an increase of 0.2 regular season wins per preseason win. The y-intercept of 7.5 does not provide a reasonable interpretation in this context. Predicting a team winning 100 preseason games would result in 27.5 regular season wins, which is impossible and thus, not a suitable use of this regression model.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Explanatory and Response Variables

In the regression equation given, the variable 'PreSeason' determines or explains the variable 'Wins'. Therefore, 'PreSeason' is the explanatory variable, while 'Wins' is the response variable.
02

Predict the Number of Wins Given PreSeason Wins

To determine the number of predicted wins given 2 preseason wins, substitute 'PreSeason' with 2 in the regression equation: \(\widehat{Wins} = 7.5 + 0.2 * 2 = 7.5 + 0.4 = 7.9.\) Therefore, a team that won 2 games in preseason is expected to win around 8 games in the regular season.
03

Interpret the Slope

The slope in this scenario is 0.2. This suggests that for every additional preseason win, the model predicts an increase of 0.2 wins in the regular season.
04

Interpret the Y-Intercept

The y-intercept in the context of this problem is 7.5, but there isn't a contextually meaningful explanation for the y-intercept in this case since typically the number of preseason games does not go to 0 nor negative.
05

Predict Outliers and Discuss Reasonableness

If a team wins 100 preseason games, substituting into the equation will give us \(\widehat{Wins} = 7.5 + 0.2 * 100 = 27.5\). But the maximum number of regular season games is less than this (16), so this is not a reasonable prediction, which exposes one of the limitations of this regression model in predicting extreme cases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
In the context of simple linear regression, the explanatory variable is the one we believe provides some explanation for the variation in another variable. In our NFL example, the variable 'PreSeason' represents the number of wins a team has achieved during the preseason. This is the explanatory variable because we are using it to explain changes or variations in the 'Wins', which is the number of wins in the regular season. Understanding the explanatory variable is essential as it is the foundation upon which predictions are made. One key point to remember is that the explanatory variable is the one manipulated or controlled in an experimental study or observed in a correlational study to determine the effect on the response variable.

The incorporation of explanatory variables into regression models helps to formulate an equation that demonstrates the relationship between two related aspects of the data. In our specific exercise, we are investigating how preseason performance may potentially impact regular season success.
Response Variable
On the flip side of the explanatory variable, we have the response variable, also known as the dependent variable. This is what we seek to predict or understand changes in - in our NFL data scenario, it's the 'Wins' during the regular season. The response variable is essentially the outcome interest. The regression model aims to predict the response variable based on the given values of the explanatory variable.

In the exercise, by analyzing football game data, we assess how well the preseason performance (explanatory variable) can predict the regular season outcomes (response variable). Understanding the dynamic between the explanatory and response variables allows us to create more accurate models for prediction and make thoughtful conclusions based on the regression analysis.
Regression Line Prediction
The regression line prediction is the heart of making forecasts in simple linear regression. It represents the best fit line through the data points on a scatter plot. This line is derived from the relationship between the explanatory and response variables. For our football data, the regression equation \(\widehat{\text{Wins}} = 7.5 + 0.2\text{(PreSeason)}\) predicts the regular season wins based on preseason wins. The process involves substituting different values of 'PreSeason' into the equation to get predicted 'Wins'.

For example, for a team with 2 preseason wins, the regression line predicts approximately 8 regular season wins. It's essential to understand that these predictions are based on aggregated data and are probabilistic. They indicate trends rather than certainties, and using past data to predict future outcomes always comes with a degree of uncertainty.
Slope Interpretation
The slope of the regression line is a critical component in interpreting the relationship between variables. It represents the rate at which the response variable 'Wins' changes for a one-unit change in the explanatory variable 'PreSeason'. In our exercise, the slope is 0.2. What this tells us is that for every additional win in the preseason, the model predicts an increase of 0.2 wins in the regular season. This interpretation provides valuable insight into how influential preseason success is on the outcomes of the regular season according to the data analyzed.

Understanding the slope gives us a sense of the strength and direction of the relationship. As we put this into context, it suggests that preseason performance does have a positive, albeit small, effect on regular season success, according to this model.
Y-Intercept Significance
Finally, we consider the y-intercept in a regression model, which is the value of the response variable when the explanatory variable is zero. The y-intercept in the NFL regression equation is 7.5. This would theoretically represent the predicted wins in the regular season if a team had zero preseason wins. However, interpreting the y-intercept within the context of this scenario isn't necessarily reasonable, because having zero preseason wins is a scenario that doesn't typically occur, and the model is not designed to predict outcomes for such extreme cases.

Nevertheless, the y-intercept is a fundamental part of the regression equation because it adjusts the height of the line and completes the formula needed to make predictions for other values of the explanatory variable. The y-intercept is critical in framing the regression line correctly within the coordinate space of the data points.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Marriage Age vs Number of Children Using the Gapminder software (https://www.gapminder .org/tools), set the vertical axis to Age at 1st marriage (women) and the horizontal axis to Babies per woman. This scatterplot shows the mean age at which woman marry, and the mean number of children they have, for various countries. Click the play icon and observe how the scatterplot changes over time, then answer the following questions: (a) Overall, is there a positive or negative association between \(A\) ge at 1 st marriage and Babies per woman? (b) Describe what happens to the number of babies per woman, and age at 1 st marriage, between 1941 and 1943 in Russia (at the height of World War II). (c) Describe what happens to the number of babies per woman, and the age at 1st marriage, in Libya from 1973 to 2005 .

Use data on college students collected from the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment survey \(^{18}\) conducted in Fall 2011 . The survey was administered at 44 colleges and universities representing a broad assortment of types of schools and representing all major regions of the country. At each school, the survey was administered to either all students or a random sample of students, and more than 27,000 students participated in the survey. Binge Drinking Students in the ACHANCHA survey were asked, "Within the last two weeks, how many times have you had five or more drinks of alcohol at a sitting?" The results are given in Table \(2.13 .\) Table 2.13 In the last two weeks, how many times have you had five or more drinks of alcohol? $$\begin{array}{l|rr|r}\hline & \text { Male } & \text { Female } & \text { Total } \\\\\hline 0 & 5402 & 13,310 & 18,712 \\\1-2 & 2147 & 3678 & 5825 \\\3-4 & 912 & 966 & 1878 \\\5+ & 495 & 358 & 853 \\\\\hline \text { Total } & 8956 & 18,312 & 27,268 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) What percent of all respondents answered zero? (b) Of the students who answered five or more days, what percent are male? (c) What percent of males report having five or more drinks at a sitting on three or more days in the last two weeks? (d) What percent of females report having five or more drinks at a sitting on three or more days in the last two weeks?

A researcher claims to have evidence of a strong positive correlation \((r=0.88)\) between a person's blood alcohol content \((\mathrm{BAC})\) and the type of \(\mathrm{alco}-\) holic drink consumed (beer, wine, or hard liquor). Explain, statistically, why this claim makes no sense.

Rock-Paper-Scissors, also called Roshambo, is a popular two-player game often used to quickly determine a winner and loser. In the game, each player puts out a fist (rock), a flat hand (paper), or a hand with two fingers extended (scissors). In the game, rock beats scissors which beats paper which beats rock. The question is: Are the three options selected equally often by players? Knowing the relative frequencies with which the options are selected would give a player a significant advantage. A study \(^{10}\) observed 119 people playing Rock-Paper-Scissors. Their choices are shown in Table 2.6 . (a) What is the sample in this case? What is the population? What does the variable measure? (b) Construct a relative frequency table of the results. (c) If we assume that the sample relative frequencies from part (b) are similar for the entire population, which option should you play if you want the odds in your favor? (d) The same study determined that, in repeated plays, a player is more likely to repeat the option just picked than to switch to a different option. If your opponent just played paper, which option should you pick for the next round? $$\begin{array}{lc}\hline \text { Option Selected } & \text { Frequency } \\\\\hline \text { Rock } & 66 \\\\\text { Paper } & 39 \\\\\text { Scissors } & 14 \\\\\hline \text { Total } & 119 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

Using the data in the StudentSurvey dataset, we use technology to find that a regression line to predict weight (in pounds) from height (in inches) is \(\widehat{\text { Weigh }} t=-170+4.82(\) Height \()\) (a) What weight does the line predict for a person who is 5 feet tall ( 60 inches)? What weight is predicted for someone 6 feet tall ( 72 inches)? (b) What is the slope of the line? Interpret it in context. (c) What is the intercept of the line? If it is reasonable to do so, interpret it in context. If it is not reasonable, explain why not. (d) What weight does the regression line predict for a baby who is 20 inches long? Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.