/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 221 Use the dataset BodyFat, which g... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the dataset BodyFat, which gives the percent of weight made up of body fat for 100 men as well as other variables such as Age, Weight (in pounds), Height (in inches), and circumference (in \(\mathrm{cm}\) ) measurements for the Neck, Chest, Abdomen, Ankle, Biceps, and Wrist. \(^{78}\) The regression line for predicting body fat percent using neck circumference is BodyFat \(=-47.9+1.75 \cdot\) Neck (a) What body fat percent does the line predict for a person with a neck circumference of \(35 \mathrm{~cm}\) ? Of \(40 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) (b) Interpret the slope of the line in context. (c) One of the men in the study had a neck circumference of \(38.7 \mathrm{~cm}\) and a body fat percent of \(11.3 .\) Find the residual for this man.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For a person with a neck circumference of 35 cm, the predicted body fat percent is approximately 13.25%, and for a neck circumference of 40 cm, the predicted body fat percent is approximately 22%. The slope of 1.75 suggests that for every additional cm in neck circumference, the body fat percent increases by 1.75%. The residual for the man with a neck circumference of 38.7 cm and body fat percent of 11.3 is approximately -4.4.

Step by step solution

01

Predict Body Fat% Given Neck Circumference

To predict the body fat percent for a person with a neck circumference of 35 cm and 40 cm, substitute these values into the regression equation. So, for a neck circumference of 35 cm, Body Fat %= \(-47.9+(1.75*35)\) and for a neck circumference of 40 cm, Body Fat% = \(-47.9+(1.75*40)\)
02

Interpret the slope

The slope of the line represents the change in the dependent variable (Body Fat%) for each unit increase in the independent variable (Neck Circumference). In this case, the slope is 1.75, which means for each cm increase in neck circumference, the body fat percent is predicted to increase by 1.75%.
03

Calculate the residual

To find the residual for the man with a neck circumference of 38.7 cm and a body fat percent of 11.3, first predict the body fat percent using the regression line as Body Fat% = \(-47.9 + (1.75 * 38.7)\). Now, subtract this predicted value from the actual value of body fat percent. The residual = Observed body fat% - Predicted body fat%

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Residuals
When performing regression analysis, residuals help us understand how well our model fits the data. A residual is the difference between the actual value and the predicted value from our regression equation. It shows how much the prediction is off.
Imagine a man in the study with a neck circumference of 38.7 cm and a body fat percent of 11.3%. To determine how accurate our prediction is, we calculate the residual.
  • First, use the regression line: \[ \text{Body Fat extpercent} = -47.9 + (1.75 \times 38.7) \]
  • Calculate the predicted body fat percent and subtract it from the actual body fat percent (11.3%).
  • The resulting value is the residual, indicating whether the prediction was too high or too low.

A small residual means the prediction is close to the actual value, indicating a good model fit.
Slope Interpretation
The slope in a regression line is a crucial number. It tells us how much the dependent variable changes for each unit change in the independent variable. In our example, the slope is 1.75.
But what does this mean in the context of predicting body fat percent?
  • The "1.75" represents how much body fat percent is expected to change for every 1 cm increase in neck circumference.
  • So, if neck circumference increases by 1 cm, the body fat percent is predicted to increase by 1.75%.

This interpretation helps in understanding the relationship between body fat and neck circumference. It shows that neck circumference is positively associated with body fat percent, meaning as neck size goes up, so does body fat percent.
Predictive Modeling
Predictive modeling, especially using regression analysis, is a crucial tool in statistics. It assists in making data-driven predictions about unknown outcomes. By looking at relationships between variables, models can predict future or unknown values.
In this exercise, we're using neck circumference to predict body fat percent.
  • The regression equation: \[ \text{Body Fat extpercent} = -47.9 + 1.75 \times \text{Neck Circumference} \]
  • This equation helps predict body fat based on a neck measurement. It becomes a helpful tool in medical and health-related fields.
  • To predict, simply plug in the neck circumference value into the equation.

Predictive models like this are valuable because they reduce uncertainty and allow for informed decision-making based on statistical analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Levels of carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) in the atmosphere are rising rapidly, far above any levels ever before recorded. Levels were around 278 parts per million in 1800 , before the Industrial Age, and had never, in the hundreds of thousands of years before that, gone above 300 ppm. Levels are now over 400 ppm. Table 2.31 shows the rapid rise of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) concentrations over the 50 years from \(1960-2010\), also available in CarbonDioxide. \(^{73}\) We can use this information to predict \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) levels in different years. (a) What is the explanatory variable? What is the response variable? (b) Draw a scatterplot of the data. Does there appear to be a linear relationship in the data? (c) Use technology to find the correlation between year and \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) levels. Does the value of the correlation support your answer to part (b)? (d) Use technology to calculate the regression line to predict \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) from year. (e) Interpret the slope of the regression line, in terms of carbon dioxide concentrations. (f) What is the intercept of the line? Does it make sense in context? Why or why not? (g) Use the regression line to predict the \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) level in \(2003 .\) In \(2020 .\) (h) Find the residual for 2010 . Table 2.31 Concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere $$\begin{array}{lc}\hline \text { Year } & \mathrm{CO}_{2} \\ \hline 1960 & 316.91 \\ 1965 & 320.04 \\\1970 & 325.68 \\ 1975 & 331.08 \\\1980 & 338.68 \\\1985 & 345.87 \\\1990 & 354.16 \\ 1995 & 360.62 \\\2000 & 369.40 \\ 2005 & 379.76 \\\2010 & 389.78 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

Find and interpret the z-score for the data value given. The value 5.2 in a dataset with mean 12 and standard deviation 2.3.

Two variables are defined, a regression equation is given, and one data point is given. (a) Find the predicted value for the data point and compute the residual. (b) Interpret the slope in context. (c) Interpret the intercept in context, and if the intercept makes no sense in this context, explain why. Weight \(=\) maximum weight capable of bench pressing (pounds), Training = number of hours spent lifting weights a week. Weight \(=95+11.7\) (Training); data point is an individual who trains 5 hours a week and can bench 150 pounds.

Distribution of Blocked Shots in the NBA The variable Blocks in the dataset NBAPlayers2015 includes information on the number of blocked shots during the season for each of the 182 players in the dataset. (a) Use technology to find the mean and the standard deviation of the number of blocked shots. (b) Use technology to find the five number summary for the same variable. (c) Which set of summary statistics, those from part (a) or part (b), is more resistant to outliers and more appropriate if the data are heavily skewed? (d) Use technology to create a graph of the data in Blocks and describe the shape of the distribution. (e) Is it appropriate to use the \(95 \%\) rule with these data? Why or why not?

Use technology to find the regression line to predict \(Y\) from \(X\). $$\begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \hline X & 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 & 10 & 12 \\\Y & 50 & 58 & 55 & 61 & 69 & 68 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.