/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 Spiders regularly engage in spid... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Spiders regularly engage in spider foreplay that does not culminate in mating. Male spiders mature faster than female spiders and often practice the mating routine on not-yet-mature females. Since male spiders run the risk of getting eaten by female spiders, biologists wondered why spiders engage in this behavior. In one study, some spiders were allowed to participate in these near-matings, while other maturing spiders were isolated. When the spiders were fully mature, the scientists observed real matings. They discovered that if either partner had participated at least once in mock sex, the pair reached the point of real mating significantly faster than inexperienced spiders did. (Mating faster is, apparently, a real advantage in the spider world.) Describe the variables, indicate whether each variable is quantitative or categorical, and indicate the explanatory and response variables.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The variables are 'Participation in near-matings' and 'Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity'. 'Participation in near-matings' is a categorical variable, while 'Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity' is a quantitative variable. The explanatory variable is 'Participation in near-matings', and the response variable is 'Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity'.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Variables

Read through the exercise carefully and note all the mentions of different conditions or aspects being studied. In this exercise, the variables are: 1) Participation in near-matings, 2) Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity.
02

Classifying the Variables as Quantitative or Categorical

A variable is quantitative if it represents a measurable quantity, whilst it is categorical if it represents a quality or characteristic. Participation in near-matings is a categorical variable since the spiders either participated (yes) or did not participate (no). Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity is a quantitative variable as it can be measured.
03

Identifying the Explanatory and Response Variables

Explanatory variables are those that may cause or explain changes in the response variable. In this exercise, the explanatory variable is Participation in near-matings and the response variable is Speed of reaching real mating upon maturity. This is because the exercise indicates that participation in near-matings may affect how quickly spiders reach maturity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Explanatory Variables
When conducting a statistical analysis, understanding what an explanatory variable is becomes essential. Explanatory variables, sometimes referred to as independent variables, help explain or predict variations in another variable—known as the response variable. In simpler terms, they are the factors that we think might influence the outcome we are interested in studying.

For example, in the context of our spider study, the explanatory variable is the participation in near-matings. This variable represents whether the spiders engaged in practice mating or were isolated. The researchers were hypothesizing that this participation might influence the timing of real mating later on. Since the primary role of an explanatory variable is to anticipate or shed light on changes in the response variable, it forms an integral part of any research focusing on cause and effect.
  • Explanatory variables often probe into the 'why' or 'how' of a process.
  • They are essential in managing experiments or observational studies effectively.
Decoding Response Variables
Response variables, also known as dependent variables, are what researchers measure to see if they are affected by changes in the explanatory variables. These are the outcomes of the study, the effects that we see, once we have intervened or observed changes in the explanatory variables. In the spider exercise, the speed of reaching real mating upon maturity serves as the response variable.

Why is this important? Because understanding and accurately identifying response variables allow us to interpret the results of our statistical analysis. They help researchers pinpoint the potential effect that an explanatory variable might impart. The timely transition to real mating in spiders was hypothesized to improve with prior practice; measuring this speed thus became crucial for the study.
  • Response variables help in testing hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships.
  • They are central to drawing valid conclusions from an analysis.
Differentiating Quantitative and Categorical Variables
Variables in any statistical analysis can be classified broadly into two types: quantitative and categorical. Recognizing the nature of these variables is crucial for deciding which statistical methods to apply and how to interpret the analysis results.

Quantitative variables are characterized by numerical values that express quantities, allowing for mathematical operations. In our example, the speed of reaching real mating is a quantitative variable because you can measure it in numerical terms, like time until mating occurs.

On the other hand, categorical variables indicate categories or qualities and typically contain labels or names rather than numbers. With the spider study, participation in near-matings is a categorical variable as it can be represented by categories, such as 'participated' or 'did not participate'.
  • Quantitative variables lend themselves to calculations and graphical representations.
  • Categorical variables are best analyzed using counts and proportions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The ability to recognize and interpret facial expressions is key to successful human interaction. Could this ability be compromised by sleep deprivation? A 2015 study \(^{58}\) took 18 healthy young adult volunteers and exposed them to 70 images of facial expressions, ranging from friendly to threatening. They were each shown images both after a full night of sleep and after sleep deprivation ( 24 hours of being awake), and whether each individual got a full night of sleep or was kept awake first was randomly determined. The study found that people were much worse at recognizing facial expressions after they had been kept awake. (a) What are the explanatory and response variables? (b) Is this an observational study or a randomized experiment? If it is a randomized experiment, is it a randomized comparative experiment or a matched pairs experiment? (c) Can we conclude that missing a night of sleep hinders the ability to recognize facial expressions? Why or why not? (d) In addition, for the people who had slept, the study found a strong positive association between quality of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep and ability to recognize facial expressions. Can we conclude that better quality of REM sleep improves ability to recognize facial expressions? Why or why not?

A 2014 headline reads "Sitting Is the New Smoking: Ways a Sedentary Lifestyle is Killing You," 12 and explains the mounting evidence for ways in which sitting is bad for you. A more recent large 2015 study \(^{53}\) contributed to this evidence by following 69,260 men and 77,462 women and finding that for women, those who spent more leisure time sitting were significantly more likely to get cancer. (a) What are the explanatory and response variables for the 2015 study? (b) Is the 2015 study an observational study or a randomized experiment? (c) Can we conclude from the 2015 study that spending more leisure time sitting causes cancer in women? Why or why not? (d) Can we conclude from the 2015 study that spending more leisure time sitting does not cause cancer in women?

In elementary school (grades 1 to 6 ), there is a strong association between a child's height and the child's reading ability. Taller children tend to be able to read at a higher level. However, there is a very significant confounding variable that is influencing both height and reading ability. What is it?

To examine whether eating brown rice affects metabolism, we ask a random sample of people whether they eat brown rice and we also measure their metabolism rate.

For the situations described. (a) What are the cases? (b) What is the variable and is it quantitative or categorical? Measure the shelf life of bunches of bananas (the number of days until the bananas go bad) for a large sample.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.