/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 101 When the time comes for a group ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When the time comes for a group of people eating together at a restaurant to pay their bill, sometimes they might agree to split the costs equally and other times will pay individually. If this decision were made in advance, would it affect what they order? Suppose that you'd like to do an experiment to address this question. The variables you will record are the type of payment (split or individual), sex of each person, number of items ordered, and the cost of each person's order. Identify which of these variables should be treated as explanatory and which as response. For each explanatory variable, indicate whether or not it should be randomly assigned.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The explanatory variables in the scenario are 'the type of the payment' and the 'sex of each person'. The response variables are the 'number of items ordered' and the 'cost of each person's order'. Only the 'type of payment' can be randomly assigned.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept

To begin with, we need to understand what explanatory and response variables mean. Explanatory variables are the variables that are manipulated in the experiment to measure their effect on the response variable. Hence, these variables 'explain' or predict changes in the response variables. On the other hand, the response variable is the outcome variable, it is what changes as a result of the manipulation of the explanatory variables.
02

Identifying the Variables

In our exercise, there are four variables: the type of payment (split or individual), sex of each person, number of items ordered, and cost of each person's order. Now let's identify which are explanatory and which are response.
03

Classifying Variables

The type of payment and the sex of each person are explanatory variables, as these can be manipulated or set before the experiment. The number of items ordered and the cost of each person's order are response variables since we are investigating how the type of payment and sex influence these two variables.
04

Random Assignment

Random assignment is a critical element of a valid experimental design. In this scenario, only the 'type of payment' can be randomly assigned, changing the payment conditions for different groups to eliminate bias. However, the 'sex of each person' can't be randomly assigned as it is an inherent characteristic of each individual.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory and Response Variables
Understanding the relationship between variables is fundamental in experimental design. When conducting an experiment like the one about how payment method may influence restaurant orders, we differentiate between explanatory and response variables. An explanatory variable is the one that might predict or cause a change; it's a condition we manipulate.

In the dining scenario, the type of payment—whether the bill is split or paid individually—is an explanatory variable. We might hypothesize that this aspect influences people's choices. Conversely, a response variable is the outcome being measured; it's what might change due to the experiment. In our case, the number of items ordered and the cost of each order are response variables because they are likely to vary in response to the type of payment.

By manipulating the explanatory variable while observing the response variable, researchers can make inferences about cause and effect relationships. It allows us to gain insights into how different payment methods might impact ordering behavior.
Random Assignment
A key component of a well-designed experiment is random assignment. This process involves allocating subjects to different treatment groups based on chance rather than choice, which helps ensure that the groups are comparable at the start of the experiment.

In the restaurant billing scenario, randomly assigning customers to either the split bill or individual payment group means every participant has an equal chance of being in either group. This approach neutralizes other variables that could impact the outcome, such as personal income or hunger level, leading to more reliable results. However, it's essential to note that not all variables can be subject to random assignment. Traits like sex or age are inherent and cannot be changed or distributed at random for the purpose of an experiment.
Variable Classification
Correctly classifying variables ensures clarity in hypothesis testing and analysis. Variable classification categorizes variables by their role and the kind of data they represent. In our restaurant example, we classify 'type of payment' and 'sex of each person' as categorical explanatory variables.

Categorical variables indicate a quality or characteristic, typically without any inherent order. The 'number of items ordered' and the 'cost of each person's order' are both quantitative response variables, representing numerical data we can measure or count. Proper classification supports effective design and interpretation of an experiment, allowing for accurate comparisons and conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate whether we should trust the results of the study. Is the method of data collection biased? If it is, explain why. Ask a random sample of people in a given school district, "Excellent teachers are essential to the well-being of children in this community, and teachers truly deserve a salary raise this year. Do you agree?" Use the results to estimate the proportion of all people in the school district who support giving teachers a raise.

For the situations described. (a) What are the cases? (b) What is the variable and is it quantitative or categorical? Measure the shelf life of bunches of bananas (the number of days until the bananas go bad) for a large sample.

A study published in 2010 showed that city dwellers have a \(21 \%\) higher risk of developing anxiety disorders and a \(39 \%\) higher risk of developing mood disorders than those who live in the country. A follow-up study published in 2011 used brain scans of city dwellers and country dwellers as they took a difficult math test. \(^{61}\) To increase the stress of the participants, those conducting the study tried to humiliate the participants by telling them how poorly they were doing on the test. The brain scans showed very different levels of activity in stress centers of the brain, with the urban dwellers having greater brain activity than rural dwellers in areas that react to stress. (a) Is the 2010 study an experiment or an observational study? (b) Can we conclude from the 2010 study that living in a city increases a person's likelihood of developing an anxiety disorder or mood disorder? (c) Is the 2011 study an experiment or an observational study? (d) In the 2011 study, what is the explanatory variable and what is the response variable? Indicate whether each is categorical or quantitative. (e) Can we conclude from the 2011 study that living in a city increases activity in stress centers of the brain when a person is under stress?

Armoring Military Planes During the Second World War, the U.S. military collected data on bullet holes found in B-24 bombers that returned from flight missions. The data showed that most bullet holes were found in the wings and tail of the aircraft. Therefore, the military reasoned that more armor should be added to these regions, as they are more likely to be shot. Abraham Wold, a famous statistician of the era, is reported to have argued against this reasoning. In fact, he argued that based on these data more armor should be added to the center of the plane, and NOT the wings and tail. What was Wald's argument?

Example 1.5 studied a variant of the gene \(A C T N 3\) which inhibits fast- twitch muscles and seems to be less prevalent in sprinters. A separate study \(^{9}\) indicated ethnic differences: Approximately \(20 \%\) of a sample of Caucasians, approximately \(25 \%\) of a sample of Asians, and approximately \(1 \%\) of a sample of Africans had the gene variant. What are the variables in this study? Classify each as categorical or quantitative.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.