/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 90 In estimating the mean score on ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In estimating the mean score on a fitness exam, we use an original sample of size \(n=30\) and a bootstrap distribution containing 5000 bootstrap samples to obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval of 67 to 73 . In Exercises 3.90 to 3.95 , a change in this process is described. If all else stays the same, which of the following confidence intervals \((A, B,\) or \(C)\) is the most likely result after the change: \(\begin{array}{lll}A .66 \text { to } 74 & B .67 \text { to } 73 & \text { C. } 67.5 \text { to } 72.5\end{array}\) Using the data to find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The most likely result for the 99% confidence interval after the change in the process is Option A, the interval from 66 to 74.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Confidence Intervals

Confidence intervals are a range of values that are likely to contain the population parameter. Moving from a 95% confidence interval to a 99% confidence interval means that we want to be even more sure that our interval contains the true population parameter. As a result, a 99% confidence interval will be wider than a 95% confidence interval, all other things being equal.
02

Evaluating the Options (A, B and C)

Let's evaluate each of the given confidence interval options. Option A (66 to 74) is wider than the original interval (67 to 73), while Options B (67 to 73) and C (67.5 to 72.5) are not wider. Remember, we are looking for a wider interval as we are moving to a 99% confidence interval.
03

Choosing the Most Likely Result

As a result, we should consider Option A (66 to 74) as the most likely outcome for the 99% confidence interval. This option is wider than the initial 95% confidence interval, which is what one would expect when moving to a higher confidence level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bootstrap Distribution
When estimating the mean score of a fitness exam, sometimes we use a powerful technique called the bootstrap distribution. This method involves repeatedly resampling our original sample to create a larger number of bootstrap samples. For example, in our problem, we use 5000 bootstrap samples.

The purpose of these bootstrap samples is to mimic sampling from the population itself. Here's how it works:
  • Take random samples, with replacement, from the original data.
  • Each sample is the same size as the original sample, which in our case is 30.
  • Calculate the statistic of interest (like the mean) for each of these samples.
Over these 5000 samples, if you plot the calculated means, you'll get the bootstrap distribution, which shows you the variability of the sample mean. The bootstrap distribution helps us to create confidence intervals by estimating the sampling variability when the population standard deviation is unknown.
Population Parameter
The foundation of statistical analysis is understanding what we're truly aiming to estimate, which is known as the population parameter. In this exercise, our focus is on estimating the population mean of scores on the fitness exam.

The population parameter represents the value of interest in the overall population, but we rarely have the luxury of knowing it directly. Instead, we rely on samples, which are smaller, manageable parts of the population. We calculate statistics from these samples to make educated guesses about the population parameter. Here, the sample mean from our 30 exam scores is used to predict the true, unobservable mean score for the entire population of interest.

Statisticians use confidence intervals to express the reliability of these estimates as they provide a range of values that are likely to contain the population parameter. Therefore, while the true population parameter remains unknown, our use of samples and confidence intervals allows approximations that can guide decision-making.
Confidence Level
The term confidence level refers to how certain we are that our confidence interval actually contains the population parameter we're interested in. In our exercise, both a 95% and a 99% confidence interval are mentioned.

  • A 95% confidence level means that if we were to take many samples and build a confidence interval from each, we would expect 95% of those intervals to contain the true population parameter.
  • Similarly, a 99% confidence level indicates even greater certainty, though it results in a wider interval to accommodate that increased confidence.
As we increase our confidence level (for example, moving from 95% to 99%), our interval also becomes wider. This is because we want to be more certain that our interval covers the true population parameter, and the trade-off for this increased certainty is less precision in terms of range. Hence in our exercise, the option that provides a wider range is more aligned with a move from a 95% to a 99% confidence level.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are Female Rats More Compassionate Than Male Rats? Exercise 3.79 describes a study in which rats showed compassion by freeing a trapped rat. In the study, all six of the six female rats showed compassion by freeing the trapped rat while 17 of the 24 male rats did so. Use the results of this study to give a point estimate for the difference in proportion of rats showing compassion, between female rats and male rats. Then use StatKey or other technology to estimate the standard error \(^{39}\) and use it to compute an interval estimate for the difference in proportions. Use the interval to determine whether it is plausible that male and female rats are equally compassionate (i.e., that the difference in proportions is zero). The data are available in the dataset CompassionateRats.

Average Penalty Minutes in the NHL In Exercise 3.86 on page \(204,\) we construct an interval estimate for mean penalty minutes given to NHL players in a season using data from players on the Ottawa Senators as our sample. Some percentiles from a bootstrap distribution of 1000 sample means are shown below. Use this information to find and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for the mean penalty minutes of NHL players. Assume that the players on this team are a reasonable sample from the population of all players.

A \(95 \%\) confidence interval is given, followed by possible values of the population parameter. Indicate which of the values are plausible values for the parameter and which are not. \(\mathbf{3} . \mathbf{4 3}\) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for a mean is 112.1 to 128.2 . Is the value given a plausible value of \(\mu\) ? (a) \(\mu=121\) (b) \(\mu=113.4\) (c) \(\mu=105.3\)

Give information about the proportion of a sample that agree with a certain statement. Use StatKey or other technology to find a confidence interval at the given confidence level for the proportion of the population to agree, using percentiles from a bootstrap distribution. StatKey tip: Use "CI for Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval if, in a random sample of 1000 people, 382 agree, 578 disagree, and 40 can't decide.

Comparing Methods for Having Dogs Identify Cancer in People Exercise 2.17 on page 55 describes a study in which scientists train dogs to smell cancer. Researchers collected breath and stool samples from patients with cancer as well as from healthy people. A trained dog was given five samples, randomly displayed, in each test, one from a patient with cancer and four from healthy volunteers. The results are displayed in Table \(3.14 .\) Use StatKey or other technology to use a bootstrap distribution to find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of time

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.